Go Home

measure11_no_5ae67.JPGOverlooked perhaps in the historic vote that made Barack Obama the nation's first African-American president is something that didn't happen. With the defeat of the McCain/Palin ticket and its extremist anti-abortion platform, Americans voted against an abrogation of women's reproductive rights that might have taken a generation to undo. And by rejecting draconian ballot measures in Colorado, South Dakota and California, voters protected a woman's right to choose - at least for now.

To be sure, Obama's victory prevented the emergence of conservative Supreme Court supermajority committed to sweeping away Roe v. Wade. With the potential retirement of Justices Stevens (88) and Ginsburg (83), Obama may the opportunity to make at least two nominations to the Court. (There may be 14 openings on the nation's appellate courts, all but one which currently has a Republican majority.) Given Justice Kennedy's condescending and paternalistic opinion in the 5-4 Gonzales v. Carhart case upholding the so-called federal partial birth abortion ban, the direction of the Court and the fate of Roe surely hung in the balance last Tuesday.

On that point, John McCain, Sarah Palin and the Republican Party were quite clear. McCain not only supported judicial appointees in the mold of John Roberts and Samuel Alito, he reversed course to support overturning Roe v. Wade. And to be sure, the 2008 Republican platform incorporated Palin's extremist views on abortion, banning the procedure even in cases of rape and incest:

"We support a human life amendment to the Constitution, and we endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment's protections apply to unborn children."

In Colorado, anti-abortion activists tried – and failed - to enshrine the GOP plank's logical extreme in the state constitution.

The ballot measure known as Amendment 48 would have defined a "person" as "any human being from the moment of fertilization." That ultra-hard line position would not merely have prohibited abortions in the state, as the New York Times noted, "it could ban widely used forms of contraception, curtail medical research involving embryos, criminalize necessary medical care and shutter fertility clinics." Opposed even by National Right to Life and Focus on the Family (groups which argued the measure's "timing and language are not right"), the amendment was overwhelming rejected by Colorado voters by a lopsided 73% to 27% margin.

In South Dakota, too, residents voted down harsh new abortion restrictions designed to prompt a constitutional challenge to Roe. Two years after voters narrowly beat back a ban on all abortions in the state, Measure 11 supporters crafted a new amendment offering limited exceptions for incest, rape or the life and health of the mother. (That would be the same "health of the mother" John McCain derided with air quotes during his final debate with Barack Obama.) By 55% to 45%, South Dakotans said no to the unconstitutional infringement of women's reproductive rights.

Even California had abortion restrictions on the ballot. For the third time, Golden State voters faced a measure putting in place onerous new requirements for parental notification. (As the Times noted, "would make it difficult for young women caught in abusive situations to obtain an abortion without notifying their parents, even in cases where the father or stepfather is responsible for the pregnancy.") By a narrow four point margin (52% to 48%), Proposition 4 and its 48 hour notification rule were rejected by Californians.

Of course, while pro-choice advocates may have won some battles on Election Day, the war is far from over. Across the nation, anti-abortion forces continue to advance "slippery slope" laws design to gradually undermine the pro-choice consensus in the United States.

In the wake of their victories with so-called partial birth abortion laws and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, abortion foes continue to push legislation advancing pseudo-scientific (and unsubstantiated) claims about "fetal pain" and "post-abortion syndrome." (The demeaning language of the latter played an essential role in Justice Kennedy's shocking Gonzales v. Carhart opinion.) Other states look to enact fraudulent health warnings and burdensome new regulations on the operation of family planning center, laws which have left the entire state of Mississippi with a single abortion clinic. And 4 states - Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oklahoma - now require mandatory ultrasound procedures for all women seeking an abortion.

When all else fails, there is demonization. The day after Barack Obama's historic election, Jill Stanek, the source of the discredited "infanticide" smear against him, denounced the President-elect as a "barbarian."

Share This Post

Link To This Post


18 Comments
Jo's picture

to join the modern world and rid ourselves of this onslaught by the right wing wackos to prohibit a woman from controlling her own body. As an older woman who looks back with fondness to my sexually active years, I shudder to think that I would have been forced to give birth to a child of rape. I had an abortion within 6 weeks and it was the best thing I could have done for myself and my family.

Enough, already with the pious right to life crap when it is the right wing who insist on the death penalty, another atrocity that must go the way of the hoop skirt.

Jo's picture

frist, goddammit.

calgarylady's picture

...and if men could get pregnant, you can bet they would back abortion rights. Especially if they were raped.

And yet these rightwing nutcases have no problem bombing the hell out of hundreds of thousands of babies (unborn or not), children, women and men in illegal wars while they preach their hypocrisy.

It is well past time to change the laws and finally allow women to have control of their bodies.

MsJoanne's picture

abortion would be a sacrament.

Such a shame that the young women today don't know of what took place to get Roe v. Wade (or Ct. v. Griswold for that matter) into place so that women could control their own destinies. It is colossally, devastatingly sad.

Uncle Joe Mccarthy's picture

millions of people got a close up view of what an unwanted child has to look forward to...and ran to the polls to cast their no votes

She's picture

I notice that Colorado has the death penalty. What hypocrites.

"We may not agree on abortion, but surely we can agree on reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies in this country. The reality of gun ownership may be different for hunters in rural Ohio than for those plagued by gang-violence in Cleveland, but don't tell me we can't uphold the Second Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals. I know there are differences on same-sex marriage, but surely we can agree that our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters deserve to visit the person they love in the hospital and to live lives free of discrimination. Passions fly on immigration, but I don't know anyone who benefits when a mother is separated from her infant child or an employer undercuts American wages by hiring illegal workers. This too is part of America's promise - the promise of a democracy where we can find the strength and grace to bridge divides and unite in common effort."


Man smart, woman smarter.

not stupid's picture

My mother who died 10 years ago at the age of 80 always told us that if men where able to give birth. No family would be bigger than 3 children and we would have birth control as Japan did legalized “Viagra” before the pill.

It was in the EU and it was the male Ivy plant. She learned to abort by a Doctor that just told her to use a simple herb, and it was in 1937. It was the way that she was able to control the family size

Every time I see Palin in the last few pictures her baby is hold like a bag of potatoes. I never remember holding my 2 children the way she did. Face away from you! I think she heard about her possible change that is why she could not go for the sensible abortion. Instead after 7 months she announced that she was pregnant.

She is a phony.

Rick's picture

Justice Ginsburg is 75.

ruby's picture

We made big strides in WA State. We didn't have any amendments or initiative's on our ballots. But, we did re-elect Gov Gregoire (D) who fought hard against pharmacist here in WA who didn't want to fill bc or plan b prescriptions because of there personal morals. Gregoire made it clear that bc is a discision made between a patient and the doctor. Her apoinent Dino Rosi (who was the only Republican in my voters pamplet that chose to have GOP by his name instead of R)came out in favor of the idea. If your pharmacy wouldn't fill the prescription you had to tell them about a pharmacy w/ in so many miles that would. He also is against making insurance company's cover bc pills. Funny how Viagra doesn't seem to be agaisnt anyones morales. No one asking men if they are married and trying to procreate.

ttheobald's picture

And while I stridently oppose the anti-abortion crowd, I have to at least give the McCain/Palin bit a point for being internally consistent. The opposition to abortion, if it is honest within itself, should oppose any case - basically the argument being that it's not the fault of "the baby" how it was conceived.

However, the abortion issue as a whole simply doesn't stand up from the perspective of basic human rights. The argument being that a foetus is a human, if we grant them that for the sake of the argument for a moment, you end up with the following equation:

1. Human A needs the biological support of Human B, such that without that support, A will die.
2. Ergo, pass a law that requires B to support A for as long as is necessary.

Under this equation, one can then force blood donations, organ transplants, and eventually the question comes to the government deciding whose life is worth more than whose.

And I don't trust Christian whackos to make that kind of judgment.

T

Nowonmai's picture

These 'Pro-Life' screamers (or who I call Pro Birthers) tend to think that Pro Choice means 'abort every pregnancy', when nothing could be further from the truth. Palin, McCain and their food group like to inflame crowds with 'killing babies' commentary, but a blastocyst isn't a life. Potential, yes, but life, no.

It's just this simple: if you don't believe in abortion, don't have one. But stay out of the way of those who do.

JoeBuddha's picture

I have my own "slippery slope" scenario. If a fetus is a legal person at conception, will you have to:
1) Submit all menstrual fluids for analysis and possible burial and/or autopsy?
2) Register with the government when you become pregnant?
3) Consider a miscarriage a potential crime scene?
4) Face possible battery / neglect charges if you don't follow approved diet/exercise regimes?

YourMom's picture

I never understood how "overturning" Roe v Wade could be an issue. Surely when the supreme court rules on something, that is a final decision? There is no higher court. The process means nothing if you can rule on something over and over until you get the result you want.

ChristianWacko's picture

Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. - Galatians 6:7-8

BTW if you come on my land to try and redistribute my wealth, I will shoot you.

"Clinging to my Bible and my Guns"

Libs, enjoy your day in the sun…because darkness is soon to follow!

Thank you. I will.

JoeBuddha's picture

Appropriate name.

All that really matters is that my name (whatever i am called) is written in the Lamb's book of life. Is yours?

Comments are closed on this entry