Go Home

Admiral Mullen's testimony before Congress about repealing the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy was one of the most honest, profound moments I can recall seeing in a hearing. He said this:

"We have in place a policy that forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens," Mullen said. "For me, personally, it comes down to integrity: Theirs as an individual, ours as an institution."

His point, of course, was to stress the damage done to anyone who is consistently forced to live a lie. Apparently, it took a toll on Rep. Mark Kirk, the GOP candidate for President Obama's Senate seat.

Mike Rogers, a blogger known for outing gay politicians, writes this:

In an effort to move the base in the Illinois Senate race, Kirk decided to tack right and that means throwing the gays (like him) under the bus. And once he voted that way, the phone began to ring. Not one or two, or three but 5 separate individuals contacted me about the now divorced Mr. Kirk. (Mr. and Mrs. Kirk were married from 2001 to 2009, the marriage produced no children.)

Rogers is known for being pretty accurate about the politicians he outs. He backs up his claim with this:

"In law school in DC everyone knew Mark was gay," the first source told me. I explained that the information was intriguing, it would not be enough to go on. He continued, "But I had sex with him a number of times." Well, now we're onto something I thought. "Could someone verify for me that you knew Kirk and went to school with him?" I asked. "Yes" was the swift reply. "Could you recall personal details about Kirk that others may not know?" "Yes," he said.

And he did.

The next source claimed to have gone to undergraduate school with Kirk. I asked for proof that he and Kirk were in school together and once that was shared with me, I met with the source. The source introduced me to a man who had also been friends with Kirk in college. They both shared with me their interactions with Kirk, including one sexual in nature. The source who claimed to have sex with Kirk described personal details about the House, um, er, "member." The description was the same as the first source.

And in DC, Kirk wasn't all THAT closeted. You see Mark Kirk told me he was gay. Before I had BlogActive, I had a life in Washington. As a fundraiser I raised major gifts from $5,000 to over $1,000,000... You don't do that kind of work at a keyboard, you do it at events attended by people with money. The movers and shakers and their friends.

This follows Kirk having to apologize for misstating his military service in an ad. (Where's the New York Times when you need 'em?)

In a country where liberty is such a high value (particularly to conservatives!), Mark Kirk should be able to be conservative and gay, and not held to a standard of hypocrisy in order to run for office as a Republican, but this is what happens when politics gets in bed with religion. When Republicans decided they were going to be arbiters of morality, they forced patriotic members of our Armed Services to lie and invited Mark Kirk to sacrifice integrity for ambition.

Admiral Mullen was right, and it looks like Rep. Kirk needs to do some digging to decide whether he wants liberty or the mask of forced hypocrisy. Either way, his integrity is shot.

About karoli
karoli's picture
Card-carrying member of we, the people.
Share This Post

Link To This Post


32 Comments

Is FOX going to pick up on this story?

Maybe they can get one of their bleached anchors to ask the questions that Americans really want the answers to, like was he pitching or catching?


Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.

TheSavage's picture

What's the odds that they list him with a D next to his name? ;)


"I could give a flying crap about the political process.... We're an entertainment company."
- Glenn Beck - Forbes interview; April 26, 2010

Shadowgm's picture

... 69 to 1?

taller ghost walt's picture

as in running from the truth!

Handypants's picture

"Where's the New York Times when you need 'em?"

They are too busy to bother with the GOP liars. They just do the democrats.


"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

sharkcellar's picture

Republican, closeted homosexual, military service fabricator. He must be smoking some primo weed to be living in that dreamworld.

JerryO's picture

...just Illinois Government. Can you say 'corruption'?


Government + the Federal Reserve = organized crime

unsurebutwilling's picture

always found it funny how someone could be a republican and gay now more than ever being both is impossible but the same token how can you be a christian and a capitalist? especially as is thought of now in america

Phoenix Justice's picture

I don't give a shit if a politician is gay, straight or bi. I don't give a shit if a politician is white, black, yellow, brown, purple or of mixed heritage. I don't give a shit if a politician is a Methodist, a Lutheran, a Catholic, a Baptist, a Hindu, a Shiite Muslim, a Druse, a Shinto, a Jew, an atheist or agnostic.

What I do care about, is if the politician does what he/she/it promises and whether or not he is a lying sack of shit hypocrite.

Its too bad that the vast majority of politicians are the lying sack of shit hypocrites.


Election 2012: Be Educated! Be Active! Vote!

www.PhoenixJustice.com

SDGreg's picture

other gays in return for power are the lowest form of scum.

CartoonCoyote's picture
...

I call them "Rohm-o-sexuals".

TheSavage's picture

To hell with purple people! - Unless they're suffocating - then help'em."

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mitch_Hedberg


"I could give a flying crap about the political process.... We're an entertainment company."
- Glenn Beck - Forbes interview; April 26, 2010

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Diabolus est Deus Inversus

In other news: Bears often defecate in forested areas.


Corruption favors the wealthy.

Following in the not-so-fine tradition of Jim Kolbe.

Shadowgm's picture

It would seem that being conservative attracts gays who have not come to terms with their own sexuality, i.e., a world view that is stable and unyielding, that denies/defies homosexuality ... whereas a liberal outlook requires one to both accept sexual orientation as natural.

Mike V.'s picture

is that the study would be remarkably similar to one done on members of right wing religions..
or priests in the catholic church.

mneill's picture

...but it's well-documented that many conservatives have a predilection to authoratative "Daddy-figure" rule. They don't want to have a discussion about why things are or if they should change, they simply want to be told that it's going to be this way and not to worry their pretty little heads over it.

If Daddy says it's bad, then that's the end of it, and they don't have to question any more.

taller ghost walt's picture

and yes, there are many studies about it in various forms: sexuality, religious, gender, etc.

So they want the government to do it for them. Make it illegal, then they won't be tempted by homosexuals who aren't in the closet and live, work, fall in love and marry in happiness.

So they are complete authoritarian assholes about it, since they hate themselves for having those feelings. Their arguments are nonsense b/c it's all about denying themselves.

Somehow 'small government' and Big Brother watching your sex life are compatible, since if Big Brother is watching, maybe that'll be enough of a deterrent to keep them from sinning. Doesn't work, of course, and they make millions of others miserable at the same time.

I don't care what someone's orientation is or who they are sleeping with, but when a politician is voting to deny rights to homosexuals or women based on their 'family values', I think it's appropriate to air their dirty laundry; i.e., that they engage in behavior they want to make illegal for others.

Evet's picture

Oh my God astounding.

it appears that you have to be a closet case to want DADT to continue.

Handypants's picture
...

That'd be funny if it wasn't so true.


"I know that there are people who do not love their fellow
man, and I hate people like that!
" ~ Tom Lehrer (1928 - )

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

So this is out of the question?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VuIShM5kAQ


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

In a country where liberty is such a high value (particularly to conservatives!), Mark Kirk should be able to be conservative and gay, and not held to a standard of hypocrisy in order to run for office as a Republican, but this is what happens when politics gets in bed with religion. When Republicans decided they were going to be arbiters of morality, they forced patriotic members of our Armed Services to lie and invited Mark Kirk to sacrifice integrity for ambition.

Well, I suppose one way to read the situation is that Mr. Kirk was so committed to running for office as a Republican that he was essentially "forced" into sacrificing his integrity to attain that ambition. But I think a more likely scenario is that he sought a position that could provide a degree of cover for his sexuality, with which he was unable to come to terms. Two of the most common career choices in that regard appear to be evangelical minister or right-wing social conservative politician, both of which are slightly socially elevated from the general public, and which lends their holders largely immune from uncomfortable questions -- unless, of course, the public is forced to confront evidence. This particular pathology seems to be the common thread in all these right-wing gay scandals. Rather sad, really.


Mark P. Kessinger
New York, New York

Farley's picture

they have no problem forcing gays in the military to hide who they are, because they're used to it and see no problem with it. Until it bites them in the ass.

Farley's picture

are gimps. The self-hate they must feel. Very sad.

I worked with a guy back in the 90s who was a gay white male right-winger, semi-out. He would say that he was against equal rights legislation for gays "because the government shouldn't be involved." Made no sense whatsoever. He was also the most racist person I've ever met, in favor of imprisoning all blacks (his exact words), restoring apartheid in South Africa, and prosecuting anyone heard speaking anything but English anywhere in the US. Disgusting person.

Scarabus's picture

Is it a coincidence you wrote "[T]his is what happens when politics gets in bed with religion" on the same day it was announced Ted Haggard had incorporated a new church? Yeah, that Ted Haggard. The gay man who bashed other gay men from his pulpit. The man who spoke each week to George Bush as a spiritual adviser.

karoli's picture

It's bad enough Haggard is starting a new church, but to do it in the same area? Clearly he expects to find people who attended the other one.

Rick's picture

This is the same guy who told the Chinese they should not believe the financial statements presented by the United States government. That's a pretty stupid thing to say to the nation's largest creditor.

After that, and his military service "misstatement" (because "lie" is such an ugly word), and his obvious hypocrisy, this guy should be outta here. I hope Illinois voters agree.

shag12@sbcglobal.net's picture

I am all for busting hypocrites.

Comments are closed on this entry