A for Effort
B for Execution
C- Bush & Cheney indictments (Justice)
B+ Afghanistan (DoD)
B+ Iraq (DoD)
C- Healthcare (DHS/Congress)
B Domestic Infrastructure (?)
C- Federal Reserve (Treasury)
C Bank Bailout (Treasury/Commerce)
B+ International Diplomacy (State)
• Surveillance and Security State Welfare and Maintenance Program √ • Grade A exemplary
• Military Industrial Complex Welfare and Maintenance Program √ • Grade A exemplary
• Bankers' Welfare Program √ • Grade A+ extraordinary
• Medical Industrial Complex Welfare and Expansion Program • Grade Incomplete
• Propaganda Maintenance and Expansion Program √ • Grade A+ extraordinary, he may actually give warmongering a good name (to his gullible if diminishing flock of admiring peasants) as in Yes we Cannes. The warmongers loved his Oslo Peace Prize speech.
The overall Grade is Incomplete but most promising, to the Oligarchs for whom he works.
For the teaming unwashed masses, well who cares about them anyway except for a few wayward socialists.
MD on ending war in Iraq
MD on ending don't-ask-don't-tell
MD on closing Gitmo
MD on standing up for the public option
MD on leadership for an adequately-sized stimulus
MD on prosecutions of VIGOROUS crimes in previous administration
MD on prosecuting communications companies for illegal wiretaps & eavesdropping
MD on supporting gay marriage (he didn't run on this but fails regardless)
MD on capitulating on everything to Republicans with the absurd notion he'd find "consensus"
MD on not kicking Joe Lieberman to the curb when he had the chance
Oh he does have a nice Drupal-based web site, but aside from that, that SNL sketch was dead on. He hasn't done anything and deserves the single-term he's on track for. He's more to the right than most pre-GWB Republicans, while somehow able to be tagged as a socialist.
A massive, massive disappointment. People say he was taking on too much. For taking on so much, he's accomplished so little. The one thing he did was save the economy from a meltdown. But we have such a half-assed recovery because, again, he didn't fight for the stimulus we needed.
For me, this health care debacle is the last straw.
Enough is enough. Obama has taken my support for granted for too long. His toothless, spineless presidency will be most responsible for the ass-kicking that's coming in the elections of 2010.
Someone really needs to step up, remove the gloves, and take him on from the left. I'm ready to support a real liberal with my money and my time.
Maybe we expect to much. Maybe we should be happy with torture, unnecessary wars, banker bail outs, forced to by medical insurance even if it doesn't cover anything. Maybe we are asking to much for honesty, integrity in America.
Maybe we have let these criminals in our government have control because what we really are is a bunch of greedy self absorbed bastards without any form of morals or human compassion.
Maybe the people of America are just to fucking stupid to see what we have allowed these criminal in our government to do.
Or maybe we are just criminals also.
I do know that if we continue down this same road we will all suffer the same fate.
We need to clean washington out or burn it down.
No, of course you shouldn't be happy with these things. I also think that you shouldn't have expected Obama to act as a progressive President when he's a centrist with a centrist voting record. In the United States, "centrist" is more to the right than it is in many other industrialized democracies such as Canada. True progressives, like Dennis Kucinich, were laughed out of the park.
On my sheet, he gets expelled for cheating; lying about sources in his book reports. We all know the big corporations have been giving him the answers. He has also failed to follow through with any meaningful reform. F--k him for getting my "hope" up, and further f--k him for giving my parents that glazed over Kennedy-worship look.
With the exception of "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran (ASAP)!", I have a hard time discerning much difference from Bush_43. Many of the same "players" in this administration's positions of leadership, and definitely many//most of the same FUBAR policies under Obama as under Dubya.
"F" == I would grade Obama as an EPIC FAIL.
(FYI: SS, DD == Same Shit, Different Day)
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
How 'bout removing the US attorney who originally prosecuted Siegelman? The same prosecutor Leura Canary, whose husband was Alabama's top Republican operative and who had for years worked closely with Karl Rove. She's still there and still on on the case. Courtesy of Eric Holder and Obama.
Change.
"I can't keep doing this on my own with these...people."
Since the GOP is still holding up nominations, there are limited options as there are still a ton of Bush holdovers at Justice for that reason currently.
If Obama just dismissed the person, how many minutes do you think it would take for there to be a movement to impeach over "politicizing the Justice Department"?
Moving hard at failing on bank bailout, mortgage cramdown, rollback of Justice Dept abuses and Patriot Act, wire tapping US, really failing on Afghanistan, a little better, but too slow on Iraq.
Most likely that rather than keep him back (for another term) we'll have to expel him.
So if he's doing poorly in the areas that count the most, how in the world can you possibly give him a c-? I'd have to say a very low D- verging on an F.
he's doing so poorly in the areas that I consider important (We the People instead of the politicians and wall st megabucks ba$tards and big banks, you know the players) and has so screwed up his opportunity to really make a big change (Afghanistan, Iraq, healthcare reform with reform being the operative word as well as actually applying healthcare to each and every single citizen, and so much more) that for me, he's got a big fat F! He's failing and if I could speak with him, I'd give him a good talking to.
By MICHAEL M. WEINSTEIN
Published: December 13, 2009
Paul A. Samuelson, the first American Nobel laureate in economics and the foremost academic economist of the 20th century, died Sunday at his home in Belmont, Mass. He was 94.
Written sometime ago [update: 1970] and now reprinted. Samuelson along with Keynes was counterrevolutionary to the political economy of Adam Smith and Karl Marx.
The time of Samuelson is when economics began to be viewed more as a hard science as opposed to a social science. Something it does not deserve, IMHO.
According the recent work of historian Robert Brenner (UCLA) the Marxian model, by inference rather than strict reference, will in the end, which is where we are headed, prevail.
Introduction and critique by R. Taggart Murphy here
An updated introduction to Brenner's work, about 70 pages, it is a heavy but recommended read is here
Nothing higher than a D. For one thing, he sits on his dead butt and lets his party in Congress turn the Healthcare Bill into Republican Lite. For another thing, he has been FAR too ready to compromise with the Republicans. I can picture FDR or LBJ doing gymnastic flip-flops in their graves. For another thing, he needs to learn that if you promise the common guy the moon, the poor common person is going to believe him. For another thing, he has been spending a lot of time overseas lately. Is the DC kitchen getting just a tad too warm for him? Finally, just what exactly HAS he accomplished? Compared to what FDR faced when he was sworn in in 1933, Obama has been handed a picnic. And yet, FDR accomplished more in his first 100 days than Obama has accomplished in his first 11 months. I am still waiting to seem something with substance come from him. So I would have to give Barak Obama a D -- and that's only because it's the Holiday Season, and I am feeling rather generous.
As expected, for being part of the establishment and for not moving more strongly in prosecuting the murderers and war criminals that was the Bush administraton.
perfectly concise description of this process I've read. This should be taught to all school children. America... the land where mediocrity and despair triumph.
I think this President has been a disaster so far. I give him a
D-
Reasons: for the D-
1. Afganastan
2. Justice Department/past admin
3. Bail out
4. Not leading on the health care bill!!! Get out in front and tell people what you want and ua what you wont stand for.
5. Spineless (bending to Lieberman)
7. Rham Emanle
8. Larry summers
9.Not getting people back to work with the Stimlius bill too many tax cuts not enough jobs. :(
10. Change in Washington??? I don't see it. That is what you ran on changing how Washington works and I see none of it.
I must give him an F. I nearly gave him an F- but in all fairness, that would be reserved for a situation where he had gotten us into a nuclear war.
Please bear in mind that I not only voted for Obama, I still defend Jimmy Carter as one of our better Presidents. However, Obama's performance shows:
No leadership skills
No initiative in developing leadership skills
Very little compassion toward the marginalized & those suffering the effects of our ruined economy
No apparent concern for members of the military who are fighting endless wars
Little interest in and no comprehension of how to get America's citizens back on their feet
No respect for the Constitution
I started to say "no courage in standing-up for principles" but he has plenty of guts when he's giving a helping hand to the banksters and Wall Street criminals, he just doesn't care about what happens to the average person.
In summary, I think he's on track to displace W as the worst president in U.S. history. Why? Because W was a cretin who was too dumb to realize how destructive he was. Obama is smart enough to know better but apparently doesn't care. B.O. will be remembered as the man who reinvigorated the Republican with his wishy-washy-ways and then handed the country over to that pack of nuts.
when he was president. If he had put a ribbon on the Shah's head and sent him back to Iran, we might be in a virtual paradise today. In some Sci-Fi stories, a hero is shown a horrible future that only he can save the world from. In all the stories, the hero saves the day, and the future. Today we are living in a warped bizarro world that began when Iran threw out the Shah.
But as President, he was handcuffed - and then laughed out of office. You had a pacifist President, but a situation went bad and now many see him as one of the worst Presidents of all time. I think that that's somewhat telling.
Well, he's got a nice beat and he's easy to dance to. Nice presentation, but there's a terrible sour aftertaste that makes the entire meal unpleasant, even though he has good texture and a nice mouth feel. He was a little pitchy, the costuming was straight out of Dubuque and his theatrics are too subtle. Where's the showman we saw at first? His initial shoot on the runway was first rate, but these new shots in the athletic wear are deadly. We need to see more. I'll give him a slight reprieve this week and vote Rahm off the island, instead.
Who the hell cares about the damn media? It's the people who he works for. He's done dick all to help anyone except for the super elite bankers and their criminal friends. He's worse than Bush. With Bush you expected slime and got it. Obama, with his campaign of Change We Can Believe In, got the hopes and dreams of millions of people up worldwide. Now those people are learning that NO ONE in power gives one fuck for them. The common proles can all die for all they care.
Anti-commercialist Christians ask, "What would Jesus not buy?" Congress is less popular than the average car dealer. About 140 soldier suicides in '09. Black soot is melting the Himalayas. The poor get turned away from free cancer screenings. Gore says our ice-caps might be gone even sooner than expected. But the "liberal media" tries to discredit him, anyway. The Catholic Church threatens to screw the poor, in retalion for D.C. legalizing gay marriage. Meanwhile, the Delaware division thinks pedo priests should get benefits. College grads can't find work. Oh, there go those "missing" Bush e-mails! The Copenhagen thing ironically accelerates global warming. Insert Bruno joke here. Joe might as well invoke 9/11 as his excuse for screwing us out of buy-in Medicare. One Dem thinks he should be recalled.
If we have seen anything in the last few months, it is that the President has very little real power. The Lobbyist control the country and the direction it takes.
Obama wasted his time taking on health care. If he wanted to make real change for America he would have cleaned out the lobbyists and taken away the idea that corporations can be seen as citizens.
As long as you have hedonists like Lieberman, who can sell you out while smiling at you, America is not truly free.
Obama was a nice thought and he had nice dreams, but the reality is......
I'm not one to misspell the f word but I thought I'd be polite.
But what the fuck?
At 40 seconds President Obama starts talking about health.... Insurance???
Note the pause he catches, to not say "Health CARE". Health Insurance for every american? Where's the care part? Or the reform part? You know, that part of medicine that maybe shouldn't be for profit? The part that emphasizes more discussion on health as to focus less on illness?
I will try not to digress here.
But holy crap! That pause was sooooo telling of lie. Watch it again. It's golden.
"Good catch Barry." Oprah didn't even flinch.
And look close to both the President and Oprah...
Are they high?
Peace and love
It's good to see Penn Jillette on a show besides Glenn Beck. It's hard to tolerate someone who holds themselves up as a rational thinking skeptic, and then watch the guy piss all credibility he has down the toilet by chumming it up with a dolt like Beck.
so my expectations were not irrationally high. He's not what he said he was (which of them ever are?) but I still think he's a pretty good president.
My only question is - what did he mean by healthcare for every American? I haven't seen anything in the current legislation that would provide me with healthcare unless my mom suddenly kicked it and left me all her money.
Home team chooses to receive. George at quarterback fumbles the ball after every play. Dick the coach changes the offensive line with George still at quarterback. George still fumbles the ball after every play. The offense never gets a chance to score because George can’t keep his hands on the ball. The team loses every game.
Seasons over.
Next season, Barry takes over at quarterback. He takes the first snap at the 20 yard line and completes a screen pass. Barry doesn’t drop the ball…
Celebration! The band takes the field. Vince Lombardi is on the line waiting to give away a trophy. Speeches are scheduled. There’s a parade for the home team next week.
Wait a minute!
We haven’t scored yet, let alone won any game. It’s going to be a long season.
personally, i don't believe many understand there's much/many more involved in lawmaking then the president. it's much more difficult now then ever to get consensus on issues. the minority has too much power and incentive to stop/block legislation. the powerful global elite/lobbyists/special interests have too much influence to only allow/write legislation/reform they approve of. i can't/don't underestimate the entanglements handed to the obama administration from the BUSH legacy. i give obama credit/praise for
trying to repair foreign relationships and start the legislative process regarding health care cost reform.
He may have gone to Harvard
And he may be real smart
But he flunks as a wise leader of men
He is just another bought and paid for emissary
for those who bought him
Look at what is happening
Have you ever seen such a flagrant display
Of greed in your born days
And don't tell me he is trying real hard to curb this disaster
If he was you would see all that money go into helping those with less not with more.
If he wanted to kick ass he would have already started
His campaign rhetoric was just that, rhetoric, he aint all that is he.
Just because the previous president burned down the building and set fire to the teachers, we're giving this guy too much credit for sitting there doing nothing.
After reading all the comments, I wanted to mention a few things. We all know about Bush's mess so there's no need to mention what an effed up pile of crap he left, yet again. :)
AmericaInc. is addicted to war and the MIC/Pentagon is very powerful; too powerful (maybe even hit squad powerful). And how about the spineless Reid and Pelosi not doing their jobs. We all know the oligrachs and lobbyists have way too much power and influence. Both parties are centre of right. It's not like the President is an emperor. He's got thousands of greedy (many dishonest) whack-jobs to deal with, and (quite franky) an apathetic public, some downright stoooopid.
Not a pretty picture. Did I mention the MSM?
(and I'm Canadian and can't vote for anyone, so... )
My feeling on Obama is summed up in a speech Roberts delivers to Pulver in "Mister Roberts":
“You asked me what l thought of you. Well, I’ll tell you. The day you finish one thing you've started to do... the day you actually put those marbles in the Captain's overhead... then have the guts to knock on his door and say...'Captain, l put those marbles there! '... that's the day I’ll have some respect for you. That's the day I’ll look up to you as a man. Okay?”
Until this guy finishes one thing he starts -- health care (too late), financial reform (almost too late), Guantanamo -- or even one thing he didn't start -- Iraq, Afghanistan -- he will stand as just another politician to me: all blow, no show.
For now, I'll give him a C-minus for his first year, with the comment, "Still has promise; work needs improvement."
Up to 56,000 more contractors likely for Afghanistan, congressional agency says
CRS, which provides background information to members of Congress on a bipartisan basis, said it expects an additional 26,000 to 56,000 contractors to be sent to Afghanistan. That would bring the number of contractors in the country to anywhere from 130,000 to 160,000.
The president gets an A in my book, but American Democracy gets a C.
The US is not a parliamentarian system, I wish some folks would stop pretending like it was; Congress makes laws, not the President, and he can't just will himself the votes he needs.
If the US system was working like it was intended it wouldn't be so bad. But it's not, and it's obviously a grave deficiency that when we've got about 25% Republicans, 45% Democrats and the remainder Independents among the population, that the Senate has a homogeneous group of 40 solid obstructionist Republicans and a heterogeneous group of 58 Democrats.
In an actual parliamentarian system, or just in most democracies in general, there wouldn't be a damn health-care debate. There's a popular majority for it. There was an election and we campaigned on this, and we won both the presidency and a congressional majority. In almost any other democracy it'd practically be a given that this would be enacted.
The fact that we can't seem to pass this thing, despite all that, is simply a big (small-d) democratic deficiency. The fact that 25% of the population can block what 60% of the people want is a deficiency.
The fact that our media lives in this Beltway echo-chamber, playing along with the game and without ever looking around and questioning the rules - that's a democratic deficiency.
"The fact that 25% of the population can block what 60% of the people want is a deficiency."
Well, actually they can't. Over the last few months it's been two individuals out of 300+ million in this country who've been blocking it. And their names are Reid and Obama.
Does she even realize that the election is in 3 years? the economy, jobs, and Afghanistan will be completely different by then.
by the way, as a progressive, i would give him a C+, at the very highest. he has come up short on a lot of his promises, granted he has a lot on his plate.
And the average American voter is pretty astute, that's why congress' poll ratings are so low because they know its what ends up on the presidents desk in the end isn't totally his fault.
His poll ratings put him somewhere in the C- range.
You guys are nuts! I might as well be reading the "free republic!"
What you all are witnessing (re: the health care debate)is the way our system runs.
Let's flip it around.
When George W. Bush fought for his education reform, he wanted vouchers. They were stripped out of the bill. He didn't get everything he wanted. When he wanted stupid tax cuts, he had to go to reconciliation. Why? because he got resistance. This is just the way things go in congress. You guys need to calm down. We'll get a bill and it will be improved on over time. Hell, it took 40 years to get us from Medicare to here.
The President is doing a good job. Not perfect, but looking at where he started from, a good job.
Ending Torture: F
Holding Bush Accountable: D-
Making the Rich Richer: A
Making the Poor Poorer: A
Giving Inspiring Speeches: A
Herding the Democratic Cats of Congress: D
Loving America: A
Having a Spine: F
Healthcare: A, B,C,D and now F in chronological order since the election.
Kissing GOP ass: A
Understanding that the GOP only wants power, not any form of co-operation with its political adversaries: F
Fixing DOJ: D
Annoying me: A
Playing President: A (better than M. Sheen!)
Including the progressive agenda: D-
Standing up to the Military Industrial Complex: F
Firing Military Contractors: F
Giving Main Street a break even once: F
Licking Wall Street scrotal tissue: A
Backdoor bailout for Citigroup of $38 billion. May the happy rabbits put that in their Xmas stockings.
U.S. gave up billions in tax money in deal for Citigroup's bailout repayment
DEAL MADE TO RECOVER BAILOUT
Firms exempted from rule when U.S. sells its stake
Citigroup says it has built up $38 billion in losses. With the tax exemption, it will be able to shelter up to $38 billion in future profits. (Richard Drew/associated Press)
You've captured the essence of Washington's current political condition. The Democrats have no one to blame but themselves for next year's inevitable election losses. They have squandered the best opportunity they've had in years to put this Nation back on solid progressive footing. And the irony is that they had the backing of the majority of the people. The problem is that the Democrats have failed to live up to their campaign promises, and in so doing will not be able to mobilize their constituents to go to the polls. And the Party of "Do it wrong or don't do it at all" will resume driving the bus towards the cliff.
Iraq/Afghanistan: D ... nothing here but a redress of the Bush strategy ('stall until we can claim victory and bail').
Economy: D ... and that's just for gifting us with shifty-eyes Timmy Geithner. He's fucking sandbagging you at every turn, and you're too dumb to see it.
Healthcare: D ... Lead, don't concede.
Security/Privacy: F ... if you're buying the GOP line, you're an idiot. Our national security needs to be more than retreads of the policies of failed fascist states.
Shows you the people at Time mag don't know their asses from a hole in the ground, huh?! WTF! Bernanke as man of the year... what a total and utter farce!
Since then I have found that the President is NOT the commander & Chief, rather it is some MILITARY ENTITY that runs this nation and tells the president what we are going to to apparently. This nation's military infrastructure is TOO BIG TO FAIL (i.e., too big to scale back). We are by & large a military operation with a civilian beard. It is a shame that we lost our nation decades ago to the military complex.
Did you catch the look Oprah shot at him at the end of the clip.
She doesn't look happy. She actually looks very pissed off.
Can't say I blame her. She stuck her neck out for him.
A for Effort
C for Execution
A- Supreme Court appointment
F Gay Rights
F Bush & Cheney indictments (Justice)
C Gitmo
B+ Afghanistan (DoD)
B+ Iraq (DoD)
F Healthcare (DHS/Congress)
C Federal Reserve (Treasury)
C Bank Bailout (Treasury/Commerce)
A- International Diplomacy (State)
F Bipartisanship, which he should ignore entirely.
Overall a fat C- heading into D territory.
Still better than that failure/dip**** we had from 01-09
...for mentioning gay rights. Just because they're not being discussed by the mainstream media doesn't mean that members of the GLBTQ community aren't still waiting to be respected as more than second-class citizens.
I mean, if your kid lobs a baseball through my window, I want to hear more than, "Johnny won't play baseball anymore."
I want the damned window fixed. I don't want it boarded over, or covered up with duct tape and plastic sheeting. I don't want your worthless buddy Harry telling me they'll fix it and then showing empty hands as the rain starts to fall.
I hate magic, but I've always liked Penn & Teller. But then I saw Penn on TV as another talking head, and my respect for him diminished significantly. Which isn't to say that he shouldn't have opinions on political issues, but seriously, I'm disappointed that he's chosen to add "Libertarian Talking Head" to his résumé. Has he jumped the shark?
He is the same jerk that tried to claim there was no evidence second-hand smoke was harmful, then got pissy when called on it. Typical libertarian nonsense.
He reminds me of Tiger Woods (and not in a racial way), seemed all squeaky clean and awesome at first thens turns out to be something completely different. I give him a D-. I feel sorry for everyone who fell for him hook, line and sinker and who were so nasty to everyone else who did not fall in lock step behind him.
No one knew enough about him, yet all his doey eyed suppporters would jump down your throat if you did not support him. So for all you Obamamaniacs, you made your bed, now sleep in it.
Obama came in with the wide-eyed notion of bipartisanship and set up all his chess pieces accordingly, without any backup plan. But the Reptilian party have NEVER played well with others and thus all the power shifts to a tiny portion of the radical center--the conservadems. This has been the Democratic party pattern for decades and they still never learn. And with the huge majority they won, this could have been an opportunity to turn all that around. Tell the consevaDINOs to either fall in line or be replaced by more progressive candidates. As the healthcare debacle so clearly illustrates, the Democrats biggest foe isn't Republicans, its Democrats!
...if he's engaging in the greatest 'rope-a-dope' act since Zaire, or if he's 'taking a dive'...either way you have to say it's a sad state of affairs.
He gets a C- but probably deserves a D... for disappointment. I wish I had never spent the 3 years working for him and the money I gave.
Wow, it’s a bit depressing. He may still turnout OK, but so far... a bust.
Note to Obama: Barry, nice guys finish LAST! Stop trying to win a popularity contest and do what is right for the average American. If you don't you will give the Republithugs all the momentum needed... and they will sweep back in. Is that what you want?
i live in nebraska. ben nelson is a liberal around these parts. as bad as he is, i shudder to think of what will come after him. i think, after i've finished (or paused, more likely) crying about our political stuation, maybe i'll move to canada. then i wouldn't have to worry about the fact that i lost my health insurance 3 months ago and will likely be twice that before i gain it back. hope i live through our "reform."
but there are a couple of things that you should pay attention to regarding Canada: (1) Canada has swung pretty far to the Right politically, ever since Harper became PM, and (2) Canada uses a draconian point system for rating/accepting new immigrants. It has convinced me that France would be a better destination, and I don't even speak good French!
Just saying ...
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
FYI, you can get along fairly well in France without knowing French. Fortunately, most French are actually intelligent and educated (in distinct contrast to most Americans), a large fraction knows enough English that you can get by, and despite mythology the French are by and large quite friendly toward Americans -- especially if you put forth a good-faith effort with your French-English dictionary. And French is an easy language to pick up over time, even for those of us disabled by the American education system.
What please me the most is that mothefucking Bush is gone, and Obama is doing the best he can to clean the mess. He is a man. Not a mesiah. Maybe that's your problem guys. Think of how many Liebermans are in this country. Whatever Obama proposes, they say no. For me, the man has balls. And he'll get re-elected. After all, even Bush got re elected.
A for Effort
B for Execution
C- Bush & Cheney indictments (Justice)
B+ Afghanistan (DoD)
B+ Iraq (DoD)
C- Healthcare (DHS/Congress)
B Domestic Infrastructure (?)
C- Federal Reserve (Treasury)
C Bank Bailout (Treasury/Commerce)
B+ International Diplomacy (State)
At a glance, that looks about right for me too.
FD- for Bipartisanship: Republicans will never be your friend Mr. President.far left loon >.<
Upon what actions are you basing any of those grades?
• Surveillance and Security State Welfare and Maintenance Program √ • Grade A exemplary
• Military Industrial Complex Welfare and Maintenance Program √ • Grade A exemplary
• Bankers' Welfare Program √ • Grade A+ extraordinary
• Medical Industrial Complex Welfare and Expansion Program • Grade Incomplete
• Propaganda Maintenance and Expansion Program √ • Grade A+ extraordinary, he may actually give warmongering a good name (to his gullible if diminishing flock of admiring peasants) as in Yes we Cannes. The warmongers loved his Oslo Peace Prize speech.
The overall Grade is Incomplete but most promising, to the Oligarchs for whom he works.
For the teaming unwashed masses, well who cares about them anyway except for a few wayward socialists.
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
"MD" for massive disappointment.
MD on ending war in Iraq
MD on ending don't-ask-don't-tell
MD on closing Gitmo
MD on standing up for the public option
MD on leadership for an adequately-sized stimulus
MD on prosecutions of VIGOROUS crimes in previous administration
MD on prosecuting communications companies for illegal wiretaps & eavesdropping
MD on supporting gay marriage (he didn't run on this but fails regardless)
MD on capitulating on everything to Republicans with the absurd notion he'd find "consensus"
MD on not kicking Joe Lieberman to the curb when he had the chance
Oh he does have a nice Drupal-based web site, but aside from that, that SNL sketch was dead on. He hasn't done anything and deserves the single-term he's on track for. He's more to the right than most pre-GWB Republicans, while somehow able to be tagged as a socialist.
A massive, massive disappointment. People say he was taking on too much. For taking on so much, he's accomplished so little. The one thing he did was save the economy from a meltdown. But we have such a half-assed recovery because, again, he didn't fight for the stimulus we needed.
For me, this health care debacle is the last straw.
Enough is enough. Obama has taken my support for granted for too long. His toothless, spineless presidency will be most responsible for the ass-kicking that's coming in the elections of 2010.
Someone really needs to step up, remove the gloves, and take him on from the left. I'm ready to support a real liberal with my money and my time.
Exactly. Not one wasted word in the stinging reality check of our republican-lite president.
If I were a psychopath, I would join the republican party, and get in on the gravy train taking the Teabircher morons to the cleaners.
Maybe we expect to much. Maybe we should be happy with torture, unnecessary wars, banker bail outs, forced to by medical insurance even if it doesn't cover anything. Maybe we are asking to much for honesty, integrity in America.
Maybe we have let these criminals in our government have control because what we really are is a bunch of greedy self absorbed bastards without any form of morals or human compassion.
Maybe the people of America are just to fucking stupid to see what we have allowed these criminal in our government to do.
Or maybe we are just criminals also.
I do know that if we continue down this same road we will all suffer the same fate.
We need to clean washington out or burn it down.
No, of course you shouldn't be happy with these things. I also think that you shouldn't have expected Obama to act as a progressive President when he's a centrist with a centrist voting record. In the United States, "centrist" is more to the right than it is in many other industrialized democracies such as Canada. True progressives, like Dennis Kucinich, were laughed out of the park.
Where I come from, you can fool me once, but I'll be damned if you can fool me twice.
He said he would fight for FISA, the FISA fight came and he turned 180° to run with the Fascists.
Anyone who was paying attention should have learned everything they needed to know about Obama.
I did.
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
... a telling moment for me. Privacy/security is a big issue in my book.
Everything since then has just been adding to my growing dislike of the man.
On my sheet, he gets expelled for cheating; lying about sources in his book reports. We all know the big corporations have been giving him the answers. He has also failed to follow through with any meaningful reform. F--k him for getting my "hope" up, and further f--k him for giving my parents that glazed over Kennedy-worship look.
Alice, you are spot-on in this regard.
With the exception of "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran (ASAP)!", I have a hard time discerning much difference from Bush_43. Many of the same "players" in this administration's positions of leadership, and definitely many//most of the same FUBAR policies under Obama as under Dubya.
"F" == I would grade Obama as an EPIC FAIL.
(FYI: SS, DD == Same Shit, Different Day)
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
How 'bout an "incomplete."
Let me know when this guy finishes something (anything) the way he so eloqently described it during the campaign.
(To the ever hopeful: Being better than Bush doesn't count.)
Not holding my breath.
"I can't keep doing this on my own with these...people."
same here :(
D for Don Siegelman.
I think you are a bit off base on that one. Other than a pardon, I do not see how Obama is supposed to be able to get involved in that situation.
How 'bout removing the US attorney who originally prosecuted Siegelman? The same prosecutor Leura Canary, whose husband was Alabama's top Republican operative and who had for years worked closely with Karl Rove. She's still there and still on on the case. Courtesy of Eric Holder and Obama.
Change.
"I can't keep doing this on my own with these...people."
Since the GOP is still holding up nominations, there are limited options as there are still a ton of Bush holdovers at Justice for that reason currently.
If Obama just dismissed the person, how many minutes do you think it would take for there to be a movement to impeach over "politicizing the Justice Department"?
...dismiss her for incompetence just based on the facts of the Siegelman case.
Of course, that would take a bit of political courage and we know Obama has none.
Countdown - Dr. Howard Dean, livid, on the Health Care bill
When will government of the people, by the politicians, for the corporations perish from this Earth?
Not soon enough!
If I were an insurance executive or a corrupt Wall Street CEO or a majority shareholder in a large bank, I'd probably give him an A.
It's that Universal Jurisdiction War Crime Thingy so Inconvenient to the Ruling Class.
awww!
Warrant strains Israel-UK ties - 16 Dec 09
When will government of the people, by the politicians, for the corporations perish from this Earth?
Not soon enough!
"C-" if I am in a generous mood, otherwise a "D".
Moving hard at failing on bank bailout, mortgage cramdown, rollback of Justice Dept abuses and Patriot Act, wire tapping US, really failing on Afghanistan, a little better, but too slow on Iraq.
Most likely that rather than keep him back (for another term) we'll have to expel him.
Same here: C- or D overall. He's not a failure, but he has been a very consistent huge disappointment.
and tell them that Barry needs to focus more on his classwork then hanging out with his friends?
He is definitely in danger of failing.
kinda poorly in the areas that count the most.
"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui
such as?
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
So if he's doing poorly in the areas that count the most, how in the world can you possibly give him a c-? I'd have to say a very low D- verging on an F.
he's doing so poorly in the areas that I consider important (We the People instead of the politicians and wall st megabucks ba$tards and big banks, you know the players) and has so screwed up his opportunity to really make a big change (Afghanistan, Iraq, healthcare reform with reform being the operative word as well as actually applying healthcare to each and every single citizen, and so much more) that for me, he's got a big fat F! He's failing and if I could speak with him, I'd give him a good talking to.
Well, he is definitely out of the running for Most Dependable or Most Likely to Succeed. However, he is still in the running for Mr. Congeniality.
Overall, he Needs Improvement and may need take on extra credit projects if he wants to pass.
By MICHAEL M. WEINSTEIN
Published: December 13, 2009
Paul A. Samuelson, the first American Nobel laureate in economics and the foremost academic economist of the 20th century, died Sunday at his home in Belmont, Mass. He was 94.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/ec...
brilliant man in the world of economics
Michael Hudson here
Written sometime ago [update: 1970] and now reprinted. Samuelson along with Keynes was counterrevolutionary to the political economy of Adam Smith and Karl Marx.
The time of Samuelson is when economics began to be viewed more as a hard science as opposed to a social science. Something it does not deserve, IMHO.
According the recent work of historian Robert Brenner (UCLA) the Marxian model, by inference rather than strict reference, will in the end, which is where we are headed, prevail.
Introduction and critique by R. Taggart Murphy here
An updated introduction to Brenner's work, about 70 pages, it is a heavy but recommended read is here
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
c-
F for Fucking sell out.
Uh oh...
a big fat flippin' F!
Nothing higher than a D. For one thing, he sits on his dead butt and lets his party in Congress turn the Healthcare Bill into Republican Lite. For another thing, he has been FAR too ready to compromise with the Republicans. I can picture FDR or LBJ doing gymnastic flip-flops in their graves. For another thing, he needs to learn that if you promise the common guy the moon, the poor common person is going to believe him. For another thing, he has been spending a lot of time overseas lately. Is the DC kitchen getting just a tad too warm for him? Finally, just what exactly HAS he accomplished? Compared to what FDR faced when he was sworn in in 1933, Obama has been handed a picnic. And yet, FDR accomplished more in his first 100 days than Obama has accomplished in his first 11 months. I am still waiting to seem something with substance come from him. So I would have to give Barak Obama a D -- and that's only because it's the Holiday Season, and I am feeling rather generous.
C Minus.
As expected, for being part of the establishment and for not moving more strongly in prosecuting the murderers and war criminals that was the Bush administraton.
Democrats: We must purchase X. Without X our country is history.
Republicans: Bah. Whatever. Fuck you, commie, pinko, loser, terrorist sympathizers.
President: Folks, X must be purchased. The time has come! Get to it! X will cost $100, so lay out the funds.
Democrats: Thank you, Mr. President. Okay, what do our constituents want?
Voters: Uh, lay out the $100 and get X. Duh.
Democrats: No, that's off the table.
Voters: What? Why?
Democrats: Shut up!
Republicans: How about we just analyze how much of X we really need, most likely none, and pay the proportionate amount?
Democrats: That makes sense, but we really need X. How about $80?
Republicans: $15.
Democrats: $75.
Republicans: $15!
Democrats: $65?
Republicans: $15!
Democrats: $60.
Republicans: $15!
Democrats: $55.
Republicans: $15!
Democrats: Okay, $45, but we're not going any lower! X is too important!
Republicans: $15!
Democrats: $35?
Republicans: $15!
Democrats: $30.
Republicans: $15!
Conservo-crats: You know what? The Republicans are correct. $15 is good.
Democrats: What?!?!
Conservo-crats: You'll never even get part of X without us.
Democrats: $25!
Conservo-crats: Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Democrats: $20?
Conservo-crats: $15.
President: Do what the Conserva-crats are saying. We need a deal.
Democrats: God damn it! Okay. $15.
Republicans: $10.
Democrats: Hey!
Conservo-crats: We could go for $10. After all, it's 10% more X than we have right now.
Democrats: What the hell good is 10% of X when without all of X our country is fucked?
Republicans: You guys really need to learn how to compromise. Stop being so stubborn. Stop being such idealists.
Democrats: Can we at least get back to $15?
Conservo-crats: Ehh, $10's good. Let's do $10.
Democrats: Fuck it. Fine. $10, for whatever good it'll do.
Republicans: $5.
Democrats: Stop it!
Republicans: $5, or we filibuster, and get the Conservo-crats to join us.
Democrats: Okay. $5. But no lower! We're putting our foot down for the American people.
Progresso-crats: Fuck this! We'll filibuster the damn thing!
Democrats: Hey! You lefties stay out of this! With you involved we'll get nothing! Let us do the negotiating!
Progresso-crats: We are getting nothing! You said so yourself! What good is 5% of X when without all of X our country is done?
Democrats: We're settled on $5. $5 is at least a 5% victory for the American people. We can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Progresso-crats: You're kidding, right?
Democrats: $5 and not a dollar less!
. . . . . . . . to be continued . . . . . .
Everyone is equally entitled to the pursuit of happiness. Wasn't that once self evident?
Sigh, how I wish this was funny.
perfectly concise description of this process I've read. This should be taught to all school children. America... the land where mediocrity and despair triumph.
Thanks for the work but not the less than warm, fuzzy feeling.
Be as you wish to seem
Democrats: God damn it! Okay. $15.
Republicans: $10.
Democrats: Hey!
I love it.
Reading this makes me wonder if it is the Republicans who have 60 senators.
Not 60, but nevertheless quite a few when you correctly assign the Blue Dog Liars to the appropriate category.
Very nice but the Democrats are not NEARLY so complex. They cut right to minimum much quicker than you have them do here.
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
Harry Reid went from public option to Medicare buy-in to Joe Lieberman's butt buddy inside of FOUR DAYS.
You could add in how the Dems get bargained down to -$10 and have the voters pay the difference.
I think this President has been a disaster so far. I give him a
D-
Reasons: for the D-
1. Afganastan
2. Justice Department/past admin
3. Bail out
4. Not leading on the health care bill!!! Get out in front and tell people what you want and ua what you wont stand for.
5. Spineless (bending to Lieberman)
7. Rham Emanle
8. Larry summers
9.Not getting people back to work with the Stimlius bill too many tax cuts not enough jobs. :(
10. Change in Washington??? I don't see it. That is what you ran on changing how Washington works and I see none of it.
C-
Obviously bright, but clearly not trying.
Great answer different. One of my college professors once said that about me.
Maybe the boy is smoking too much?
I must give him an F. I nearly gave him an F- but in all fairness, that would be reserved for a situation where he had gotten us into a nuclear war.
Please bear in mind that I not only voted for Obama, I still defend Jimmy Carter as one of our better Presidents. However, Obama's performance shows:
No leadership skills
No initiative in developing leadership skills
Very little compassion toward the marginalized & those suffering the effects of our ruined economy
No apparent concern for members of the military who are fighting endless wars
Little interest in and no comprehension of how to get America's citizens back on their feet
No respect for the Constitution
I started to say "no courage in standing-up for principles" but he has plenty of guts when he's giving a helping hand to the banksters and Wall Street criminals, he just doesn't care about what happens to the average person.
In summary, I think he's on track to displace W as the worst president in U.S. history. Why? Because W was a cretin who was too dumb to realize how destructive he was. Obama is smart enough to know better but apparently doesn't care. B.O. will be remembered as the man who reinvigorated the Republican with his wishy-washy-ways and then handed the country over to that pack of nuts.
when he was president. If he had put a ribbon on the Shah's head and sent him back to Iran, we might be in a virtual paradise today. In some Sci-Fi stories, a hero is shown a horrible future that only he can save the world from. In all the stories, the hero saves the day, and the future. Today we are living in a warped bizarro world that began when Iran threw out the Shah.
But as President, he was handcuffed - and then laughed out of office. You had a pacifist President, but a situation went bad and now many see him as one of the worst Presidents of all time. I think that that's somewhat telling.
Well, he's got a nice beat and he's easy to dance to. Nice presentation, but there's a terrible sour aftertaste that makes the entire meal unpleasant, even though he has good texture and a nice mouth feel. He was a little pitchy, the costuming was straight out of Dubuque and his theatrics are too subtle. Where's the showman we saw at first? His initial shoot on the runway was first rate, but these new shots in the athletic wear are deadly. We need to see more. I'll give him a slight reprieve this week and vote Rahm off the island, instead.
one of the most innovative (and true) that I've had the pleasure to read.
.
Who the fuck should be even asking the question when the media who did ask the question has had a failing grade since Reagan had been in office.
Who the hell cares about the damn media? It's the people who he works for. He's done dick all to help anyone except for the super elite bankers and their criminal friends. He's worse than Bush. With Bush you expected slime and got it. Obama, with his campaign of Change We Can Believe In, got the hopes and dreams of millions of people up worldwide. Now those people are learning that NO ONE in power gives one fuck for them. The common proles can all die for all they care.
Anti-commercialist Christians ask, "What would Jesus not buy?" Congress is less popular than the average car dealer. About 140 soldier suicides in '09. Black soot is melting the Himalayas. The poor get turned away from free cancer screenings. Gore says our ice-caps might be gone even sooner than expected. But the "liberal media" tries to discredit him, anyway. The Catholic Church threatens to screw the poor, in retalion for D.C. legalizing gay marriage. Meanwhile, the Delaware division thinks pedo priests should get benefits. College grads can't find work. Oh, there go those "missing" Bush e-mails! The Copenhagen thing ironically accelerates global warming. Insert Bruno joke here. Joe might as well invoke 9/11 as his excuse for screwing us out of buy-in Medicare. One Dem thinks he should be recalled.
He'll be the last great president this country ever has or deserves. Everyone else will "Palin" in comparison.
If we have seen anything in the last few months, it is that the President has very little real power. The Lobbyist control the country and the direction it takes.
Obama wasted his time taking on health care. If he wanted to make real change for America he would have cleaned out the lobbyists and taken away the idea that corporations can be seen as citizens.
As long as you have hedonists like Lieberman, who can sell you out while smiling at you, America is not truly free.
Obama was a nice thought and he had nice dreams, but the reality is......
but as long as we let the M$M control the message we have one hell of a hill to climb.
... media that has lost its objectivity, and a viewing public that is incapable of critical thinking as well as holding the media accountable.
I'm not one to misspell the f word but I thought I'd be polite.
But what the fuck?
At 40 seconds President Obama starts talking about health.... Insurance???
Note the pause he catches, to not say "Health CARE". Health Insurance for every american? Where's the care part? Or the reform part? You know, that part of medicine that maybe shouldn't be for profit? The part that emphasizes more discussion on health as to focus less on illness?
I will try not to digress here.
But holy crap! That pause was sooooo telling of lie. Watch it again. It's golden.
"Good catch Barry." Oprah didn't even flinch.
And look close to both the President and Oprah...
Are they high?
Peace and love
WTF indeed. He came *so* close to screwing up and saying "health care". God, what a traitorous shill for the oligarchs he's turned out to be.
Good Catch stace. You saw beneath the veneer and watched the body language to catch these actors out of character.
It's good to see Penn Jillette on a show besides Glenn Beck. It's hard to tolerate someone who holds themselves up as a rational thinking skeptic, and then watch the guy piss all credibility he has down the toilet by chumming it up with a dolt like Beck.
For me A for Effort
so my expectations were not irrationally high. He's not what he said he was (which of them ever are?) but I still think he's a pretty good president.
My only question is - what did he mean by healthcare for every American? I haven't seen anything in the current legislation that would provide me with healthcare unless my mom suddenly kicked it and left me all her money.
Kingdom Tower
I want to say you are wrong
Tue, 12/15/2009 - 22:50 — ron
but as long as we let the M$M control the message we have one hell of a hill to climb.
Home team chooses to receive. George at quarterback fumbles the ball after every play. Dick the coach changes the offensive line with George still at quarterback. George still fumbles the ball after every play. The offense never gets a chance to score because George can’t keep his hands on the ball. The team loses every game.
Seasons over.
Next season, Barry takes over at quarterback. He takes the first snap at the 20 yard line and completes a screen pass. Barry doesn’t drop the ball…
Celebration! The band takes the field. Vince Lombardi is on the line waiting to give away a trophy. Speeches are scheduled. There’s a parade for the home team next week.
Wait a minute!
We haven’t scored yet, let alone won any game. It’s going to be a long season.
Next play…
as long as the opposition has the guys in the striped shirts on their team. Referees/MSM, who can tell the difference?
personally, i don't believe many understand there's much/many more involved in lawmaking then the president. it's much more difficult now then ever to get consensus on issues. the minority has too much power and incentive to stop/block legislation. the powerful global elite/lobbyists/special interests have too much influence to only allow/write legislation/reform they approve of. i can't/don't underestimate the entanglements handed to the obama administration from the BUSH legacy. i give obama credit/praise for
trying to repair foreign relationships and start the legislative process regarding health care cost reform.
and a assinine opposition, the battles are almost impossible to win. The have to go with reconciliation.
He may have gone to Harvard
And he may be real smart
But he flunks as a wise leader of men
He is just another bought and paid for emissary
for those who bought him
Look at what is happening
Have you ever seen such a flagrant display
Of greed in your born days
And don't tell me he is trying real hard to curb this disaster
If he was you would see all that money go into helping those with less not with more.
If he wanted to kick ass he would have already started
His campaign rhetoric was just that, rhetoric, he aint all that is he.
FU!
Just because the previous president burned down the building and set fire to the teachers, we're giving this guy too much credit for sitting there doing nothing.
I just don't remember many of them.
Is it the 21st century yet?
S for scheiße.
Putting a different ribbon on the package doesn't make it smell sweeter.
After reading all the comments, I wanted to mention a few things. We all know about Bush's mess so there's no need to mention what an effed up pile of crap he left, yet again. :)
AmericaInc. is addicted to war and the MIC/Pentagon is very powerful; too powerful (maybe even hit squad powerful). And how about the spineless Reid and Pelosi not doing their jobs. We all know the oligrachs and lobbyists have way too much power and influence. Both parties are centre of right. It's not like the President is an emperor. He's got thousands of greedy (many dishonest) whack-jobs to deal with, and (quite franky) an apathetic public, some downright stoooopid.
Not a pretty picture. Did I mention the MSM?
(and I'm Canadian and can't vote for anyone, so... )
far left loon >.<
The jury is still out on Obama, IMHO.
My feeling on Obama is summed up in a speech Roberts delivers to Pulver in "Mister Roberts":
“You asked me what l thought of you. Well, I’ll tell you. The day you finish one thing you've started to do... the day you actually put those marbles in the Captain's overhead... then have the guts to knock on his door and say...'Captain, l put those marbles there! '... that's the day I’ll have some respect for you. That's the day I’ll look up to you as a man. Okay?”
Until this guy finishes one thing he starts -- health care (too late), financial reform (almost too late), Guantanamo -- or even one thing he didn't start -- Iraq, Afghanistan -- he will stand as just another politician to me: all blow, no show.
For now, I'll give him a C-minus for his first year, with the comment, "Still has promise; work needs improvement."
moved here
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
Oops. Grade going down.
Up to 56,000 more contractors likely for Afghanistan, congressional agency says
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
In lieu of healthcare???? Lots of $$$$ for war!!!
far left loon >.<
The president gets an A in my book, but American Democracy gets a C.
The US is not a parliamentarian system, I wish some folks would stop pretending like it was; Congress makes laws, not the President, and he can't just will himself the votes he needs.
If the US system was working like it was intended it wouldn't be so bad. But it's not, and it's obviously a grave deficiency that when we've got about 25% Republicans, 45% Democrats and the remainder Independents among the population, that the Senate has a homogeneous group of 40 solid obstructionist Republicans and a heterogeneous group of 58 Democrats.
In an actual parliamentarian system, or just in most democracies in general, there wouldn't be a damn health-care debate. There's a popular majority for it. There was an election and we campaigned on this, and we won both the presidency and a congressional majority. In almost any other democracy it'd practically be a given that this would be enacted.
The fact that we can't seem to pass this thing, despite all that, is simply a big (small-d) democratic deficiency. The fact that 25% of the population can block what 60% of the people want is a deficiency.
The fact that our media lives in this Beltway echo-chamber, playing along with the game and without ever looking around and questioning the rules - that's a democratic deficiency.
It's the people IN the system.
"The fact that 25% of the population can block what 60% of the people want is a deficiency."
Well, actually they can't. Over the last few months it's been two individuals out of 300+ million in this country who've been blocking it. And their names are Reid and Obama.
Does she even realize that the election is in 3 years? the economy, jobs, and Afghanistan will be completely different by then.
by the way, as a progressive, i would give him a C+, at the very highest. he has come up short on a lot of his promises, granted he has a lot on his plate.
C
very average.
but i will keep an open mind for the next 3 years.
And the average American voter is pretty astute, that's why congress' poll ratings are so low because they know its what ends up on the presidents desk in the end isn't totally his fault.
His poll ratings put him somewhere in the C- range.
after the climate confence.... way below c level
A firm "B"
You guys are nuts! I might as well be reading the "free republic!"
What you all are witnessing (re: the health care debate)is the way our system runs.
Let's flip it around.
When George W. Bush fought for his education reform, he wanted vouchers. They were stripped out of the bill. He didn't get everything he wanted. When he wanted stupid tax cuts, he had to go to reconciliation. Why? because he got resistance. This is just the way things go in congress. You guys need to calm down. We'll get a bill and it will be improved on over time. Hell, it took 40 years to get us from Medicare to here.
The President is doing a good job. Not perfect, but looking at where he started from, a good job.
Wake up buddy.
Obama and the Dems are trying to feed you a sh*t sandwhich.
Don't worry, they don't taste as bad after eating them for 20 years.
> The President is doing a good job. Not perfect, but looking at where > he started from, a good job.
To quote a certain president who I think is definitely one of the better ones:
It all depends on what the meaning of "good" is.
I would give these people in the msm an F-.
What else gould you give after the last 9 years?
and I didn't count the hundred + "filibusters" that the Pukes put on to impede progress, thats why Harkin is so important in these next few weeks.
A 'B' is fair for the shit he has to put up with, I wouldn't do it.
Ending Torture: F
Holding Bush Accountable: D-
Making the Rich Richer: A
Making the Poor Poorer: A
Giving Inspiring Speeches: A
Herding the Democratic Cats of Congress: D
Loving America: A
Having a Spine: F
Healthcare: A, B,C,D and now F in chronological order since the election.
Kissing GOP ass: A
Understanding that the GOP only wants power, not any form of co-operation with its political adversaries: F
Fixing DOJ: D
Annoying me: A
Playing President: A (better than M. Sheen!)
Including the progressive agenda: D-
Standing up to the Military Industrial Complex: F
Firing Military Contractors: F
Giving Main Street a break even once: F
Licking Wall Street scrotal tissue: A
that about does it for now!
O-BOMB-A seems determined to let the Bushies skate on all their crimes.
Backdoor bailout for Citigroup of $38 billion. May the happy rabbits put that in their Xmas stockings.
Binyamin Appelbaum WaPo here
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
it's not enough to just give a makeover.
this wreck needs to be gutted and he doesn't appear up to the task.
Bush gets an F, so it's an improvement, but his utter gutlessness has already derailed his presidency.
Where's habeus corpus? Hmmmmm???? That's a full letter grade down right there.
As every fool knows, Afghanistan is where Empires go to die. Getting MORE involved there is a big mistake. half a grade there.
His gutlessness on health care - another grade down.
bingo - C-.
It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.
-George Carlin
tweakerbelle, are you drinking again?
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
Yeah - I was pretty hammered when I wrote that.
It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.
-George Carlin
First quarter stats are dismal. One predictable capitulation after another. No running game. No pass protection. Dubious play calling.
3 and out.
You've captured the essence of Washington's current political condition. The Democrats have no one to blame but themselves for next year's inevitable election losses. They have squandered the best opportunity they've had in years to put this Nation back on solid progressive footing. And the irony is that they had the backing of the majority of the people. The problem is that the Democrats have failed to live up to their campaign promises, and in so doing will not be able to mobilize their constituents to go to the polls. And the Party of "Do it wrong or don't do it at all" will resume driving the bus towards the cliff.
during the job interview process.
Iraq/Afghanistan: D ... nothing here but a redress of the Bush strategy ('stall until we can claim victory and bail').
Economy: D ... and that's just for gifting us with shifty-eyes Timmy Geithner. He's fucking sandbagging you at every turn, and you're too dumb to see it.
Healthcare: D ... Lead, don't concede.
Security/Privacy: F ... if you're buying the GOP line, you're an idiot. Our national security needs to be more than retreads of the policies of failed fascist states.
CommonDreams here
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
FOR WHAT?
Shows you the people at Time mag don't know their asses from a hole in the ground, huh?! WTF! Bernanke as man of the year... what a total and utter farce!
I actually agree with this. Bernanke saved the economy...
(of course he was also instrumental in tanking it in the first place, but that wasn't this year.)
W
Great not only does he suck like a toilet
He overflows like one.
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
Since then I have found that the President is NOT the commander & Chief, rather it is some MILITARY ENTITY that runs this nation and tells the president what we are going to to apparently. This nation's military infrastructure is TOO BIG TO FAIL (i.e., too big to scale back). We are by & large a military operation with a civilian beard. It is a shame that we lost our nation decades ago to the military complex.
The heartless hubris in this Health Care fiasco is a monster disappointment.
ouch.
Did you catch the look Oprah shot at him at the end of the clip.
She doesn't look happy. She actually looks very pissed off.
Can't say I blame her. She stuck her neck out for him.
What is your conceptual, continuity?
...anyone I could as part of a massive community organized voter registration drive in 07 and 08.
I feel completely used.
It ain't over.
What is your conceptual, continuity?
and he's letting the dumb kids do his homework. FAIL.
A for Effort
C for Execution
A- Supreme Court appointment
F Gay Rights
F Bush & Cheney indictments (Justice)
C Gitmo
B+ Afghanistan (DoD)
B+ Iraq (DoD)
F Healthcare (DHS/Congress)
C Federal Reserve (Treasury)
C Bank Bailout (Treasury/Commerce)
A- International Diplomacy (State)
F Bipartisanship, which he should ignore entirely.
Overall a fat C- heading into D territory.
Still better than that failure/dip**** we had from 01-09
...for mentioning gay rights. Just because they're not being discussed by the mainstream media doesn't mean that members of the GLBTQ community aren't still waiting to be respected as more than second-class citizens.
If he doesn't hold Bush and Cheney accountable he'll never get better than a C in my book.
Is it the 21st century yet?
I mean, if your kid lobs a baseball through my window, I want to hear more than, "Johnny won't play baseball anymore."
I want the damned window fixed. I don't want it boarded over, or covered up with duct tape and plastic sheeting. I don't want your worthless buddy Harry telling me they'll fix it and then showing empty hands as the rain starts to fall.
Fix the window.
I hate magic, but I've always liked Penn & Teller. But then I saw Penn on TV as another talking head, and my respect for him diminished significantly. Which isn't to say that he shouldn't have opinions on political issues, but seriously, I'm disappointed that he's chosen to add "Libertarian Talking Head" to his résumé. Has he jumped the shark?
He is the same jerk that tried to claim there was no evidence second-hand smoke was harmful, then got pissy when called on it. Typical libertarian nonsense.
Also a global warming denier.
Time Magazine.
Ben Bernanke: 'TIME' Person Of The Year
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/16/ben-...
Is it the 21st century yet?
Somebody gag me with a fork. Please.
He reminds me of Tiger Woods (and not in a racial way), seemed all squeaky clean and awesome at first thens turns out to be something completely different. I give him a D-. I feel sorry for everyone who fell for him hook, line and sinker and who were so nasty to everyone else who did not fall in lock step behind him.
No one knew enough about him, yet all his doey eyed suppporters would jump down your throat if you did not support him. So for all you Obamamaniacs, you made your bed, now sleep in it.
Obama came in with the wide-eyed notion of bipartisanship and set up all his chess pieces accordingly, without any backup plan. But the Reptilian party have NEVER played well with others and thus all the power shifts to a tiny portion of the radical center--the conservadems. This has been the Democratic party pattern for decades and they still never learn. And with the huge majority they won, this could have been an opportunity to turn all that around. Tell the consevaDINOs to either fall in line or be replaced by more progressive candidates. As the healthcare debacle so clearly illustrates, the Democrats biggest foe isn't Republicans, its Democrats!
...if he's engaging in the greatest 'rope-a-dope' act since Zaire, or if he's 'taking a dive'...either way you have to say it's a sad state of affairs.
He gets a C- but probably deserves a D... for disappointment. I wish I had never spent the 3 years working for him and the money I gave.
Wow, it’s a bit depressing. He may still turnout OK, but so far... a bust.
Note to Obama: Barry, nice guys finish LAST! Stop trying to win a popularity contest and do what is right for the average American. If you don't you will give the Republithugs all the momentum needed... and they will sweep back in. Is that what you want?
and I'm grading on a curve.
i live in nebraska. ben nelson is a liberal around these parts. as bad as he is, i shudder to think of what will come after him. i think, after i've finished (or paused, more likely) crying about our political stuation, maybe i'll move to canada. then i wouldn't have to worry about the fact that i lost my health insurance 3 months ago and will likely be twice that before i gain it back. hope i live through our "reform."
but there are a couple of things that you should pay attention to regarding Canada: (1) Canada has swung pretty far to the Right politically, ever since Harper became PM, and (2) Canada uses a draconian point system for rating/accepting new immigrants. It has convinced me that France would be a better destination, and I don't even speak good French!
Just saying ...
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
FYI, you can get along fairly well in France without knowing French. Fortunately, most French are actually intelligent and educated (in distinct contrast to most Americans), a large fraction knows enough English that you can get by, and despite mythology the French are by and large quite friendly toward Americans -- especially if you put forth a good-faith effort with your French-English dictionary. And French is an easy language to pick up over time, even for those of us disabled by the American education system.
looks like he just stepped off of the implement dealers lot specializing in manure spreader sales.
As reliable a gauze condom.
ZZZZZ................
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
A C-minus and falling fast.
"Respect for the rights of others is peace." --Benito Juarez
A gentlemens C, but with each passing day it ends up being revised downward. Without extra credit I can't see him passing this semester.
What please me the most is that mothefucking Bush is gone, and Obama is doing the best he can to clean the mess. He is a man. Not a mesiah. Maybe that's your problem guys. Think of how many Liebermans are in this country. Whatever Obama proposes, they say no. For me, the man has balls. And he'll get re-elected. After all, even Bush got re elected.
Comments are closed on this entry