TOPICS

We could have saved a lot of trouble if Obama started out this way, but better late than never, I suppose. The Republicans have already done such a stellar job selling the misperceptions, it might be too late:

This time, the President is going to be specific. Next week, President Obama is going to give Democrats a health care plan they can begin to sell.

He plans to list specific goals that any health insurance reform plan that arrives at his desk must achieve, according to Democratic strategists familiar with the plan. Some of these "goals" have already been agreed to, including new anti-discrimination restrictions on insurance companies. Others will be new, including the level of subsidies he expects to give the uninsured so they can buy into the system.

Obama will also specify a "pay for" mechanism he prefers, and will specify an income level below which he does not want to see taxed.

He will insist upon a mechanism to cut costs and increase competition among insurance companies -- and perhaps will even specify a percentage rate -- and he will say that his preferred mechanism remains a government-subsidized public health insurance option, but he will remain agnostic about whether the plan must include a robust public option. Officials won't say whether the president intends to endorse a specific "trigger" mechanism if the competition mechanism fails, but they say he will make it clear that the final bill must contain language that increases competition.

Though officials would not provide the numbers Obama plans to use, they say that the goal is to give his side -- Democrats -- a true presidential plan that they can sell. That includes the rebranding of several consensus initiatives, like the insurance reforms, as his own. The effect of this sales job, if it works, will be to associate the president with parts of the reform bills that are almost certainly likely to pass -- assuming the Senate doesn't bog down.

The White House hopes the specifics will be specific enough to gradually soothe the concerns of the Democratic caucus. The budget reconciliation process remains a cudgel -- it's still the weapon of last resort, and President Obama has told his advisers that he does not want to ask Congress to use the mechanism until it becomes necessary, politically -- that is, until the public understands that the popular elements of reform will not pass without using it.



Login or Register to post comments.

67 comments

According to Raw Story: "Obama won't insist on public option, aides say"

Link Here: http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/09/02/obama-...

It's all up to the progressive caucus in the house now I guess.

Check your sources first. This is Raw reporting a POLITICO article. Politico is run by former Regan staffers.

Raw generally fact checks. If it was just in the Politico I wouldn't have linked it. Even TPM has used them as a source on some things recently iirc. I will watch Raw to see if they retract their info. Indeed.

The speech isn't made yet. This could be another "test float" of the idea. If so, it is important regardless of source. If his aides get enough feedback then the content of the planned speech may change.

Also, the part of the right wing (that isn't insane and already thinking Bachmann is the Lord's Handmaiden) is actually starting a backlash against the "farther-right" misinformation machine. There have been calls against WND, and even some who are backing off Beck. I even have seen some upset on my very conservative mailing lists about support for some of the really far right wacko stuff.

Sad

that this administration has to 'test float' this or any other ideas about health insurance reform.

If any of this is true, it seems Obama is trying to find a way to coddle the insurance companies while he hawks a cumbersome, compromised reform option.

Sad, watching this country devolve into bickering, ignorant, ill-informed, partisan sheeple led by bickering, partisan, Corporatist-owned politicians.

that the clintons did the same thing and were exposed for it. You'd think (R)ahm had learned something.

"Sad, watching this country devolve into bickering, ignorant, ill-informed, partisan sheeple led by bickering, partisan, Corporatist-owned politicians."

Nothing new here.

Because 'unnamed' aides have been so reliable so far. /snark
Sorry, but given the general level of unconfirmed BS out there, I'll believe it when I see it, from the horse's mouth.
If and when this rumor (like many others) is proven untrue, will anyone hold these hacks accountable?

Why were the Republicans were so deadset and determined to see democracy in Iraq, and yet are so reluctant to have it here? I mean, they did lose the presidential election, right?

Democracy in Iraq is a cover for continued military intervention to support various corporate interests. Democracy in the US would be counterproductive to the interests of politicians and corporations.

juuust great

has just come out with the greatest mis-direction play in all of sports history - faking handing the ball off to Congress and then doubling around and passing the ball to himself for the touchdown.

Something tell me it's too late. The cattle are gone because the barn door was left open, and in the last month, the farm was burned down by angry protesters.
But, maybe I'm wrong. I sure hope so!

the crops then got stuck in the mud. The 'Thugs then stole the farmer's gas he had "horded" on his farm, but still finding themselves stuck in the mud (never learned to lock the hubs before), they tried to use the farmer's now empty-tanked tractors to free themselves, with equally pathetic results.

and

now they've convinced the farmer that its the DEMOCRATS that are out to do him harm!

And he bought it.

"Why isn't our children learning?"

I think that this time has let things simmer down a little bit. Perhaps some people will return with cooler heads. Perhaps.

I think the goal has been to let the nutbags and the corporations go nuts for awhile (it was unavoidable after-all), and then use the bully-pulpit to point out how dishonest and dangerous these elements are.
If Obama frames this debate as a 'last chance to save healthcare' for the young and the old (medicare) he could still win big.

I honestly don't know how this is going to turn out.

President: "I will set the bar this low. Surely you can do this little in an effort to reform health care."

Rethugs: "Okay, but you will have to lower the bar even more if you want us to cooperate--(which we won't.)"

President: "In the name of bipartisanship, anything you want.""

Everyone is happy except the people who wanted to get out of the clutches of the insurance industry and the uninsured.

I'm

taking bets on how long it takes until the White House starts backing the Grassley "plan" to scrap all the work that's been done so far and go hat in hand to the GOP and let them draft the bill.

And another bet on how long it will take them to slowly drop dead as they hold their breath waiting for that bill.

Anyone?

even I can't buy that...

The crazy republicans have fogged up the whole issue so much that serious people are confused. I think they will welcome some serious talk at this point and some guidance. The crazies have thrown every spit ball possible and in turn made themselves look idiotic. No one will listen to them as they get more and more desperate. Most republicans are not going to support anything this president does even if god himself came down and endorsed it. The president has to convince the Ind. and Dems that he is serious about the goodwill and health of all Americans.

by acting like loons, the opposition has exposed themselves to mockery and derision, as well as honest criticism of their arguments.
They've given Obama plenty of ammo to use against them, if he really wants to play hard-ball.

The question is; will he?

"it might be too late"

Don't say that, negative thinking never got anybody anywhere. CBS is part of the corporate media complex, we know better than to trust any polls from them.

That's the question I have heard on the cable news channels this morning, Is it too late? By even asking that question they are planting the idea in the public's head that it could be. Suggestions like that can have a very negative force. In other words, I agree with you.

I wonder how serious Michele Bachmann is about sliting her wrist. Shouldn't she be put on suicide watch?

They plant negativity, I've seen it many times even on "trusted" channels. lol about Bachmann, she just keeps getting crazier.

I remember during the presidential campaign how many times they counted Obama out for first one thing and then another. It didn't work then and hopefully it won't work now. Negativity is draining on the human mind, positivity is like fuel for the mind. With all that's going on the last thing we need is to bring down even more people's attitudes about their future.

I know what you mean about Obama, he kept rising against all odds. I hope health care will be kept immune from these attacks corporate or otherwise.

Something about "pre-existing conditions" or some such...

We could get together and mail her some razor blades but I don't think providing someone that whacko with sharp objects is in societies best interests—what were the folks who elected her thinking? Was her opponent in the general election the second coming of Josef Stalin?—actually, I think today's GOP would fawn over Stalin if he was running as a GOPer.

coupons for razer blades.

I will NOT support ANY "REFORM" unless it has a public Option. IN fact I now want Single Payor.

No one has even mentioned single payer in this package and the president didn't even mention it when he campaigned for president. So I don't think you can expect that right now.

Hillary and Obama were both bought out early by big pharma. They both campaigned to keep Insurance companies in the health care business. It was the biggest issue, along with Middle East policies, that soured me on their candidacies in the first place. If we wanted single pay health care we should have elected Kucinich or maybe Dodd. I wish.

... and passes that way, this is what to watch for.

Subsidies will be in. I think subsidies in some form, details to be banged out still, has more than enough support.

Public option is the only possible feature being discussed in this bill that would offer any price pressure on premiums. New reform rules will force insurers to offer more expensive policies as the cheap high deductible, low cap policies will not be legal under reform. But now, via subsidies to people to afford insurance, the government will be subsidizing the higher premiums. If anyone knows another feature being discussed that would provide price control/competition/pressure, let me know. I would love to be wrong here.

Once the cost of this sinks in, the government will have two options. Kill, or severely limit the subsidies, or risk losing the AAA rating on government bonds (bad idea). So Obama is being set up for this to look like a fail once it is implemented.

In 2007, per capita on health care, Sweden spent $3323, and Canada spent $3895. The US spent $7,421. How can Obama not see that mandating the $7,421 per person system to cover more things with lower deductibles, and then telling the insurance companies, it's OK, we'll subsidize the higher premiums you will have to charge for that is not being set up to fail?

they should do a better job letting people know that subsidies change nothing, other than funneling even MORE money to the insurance companies for the same crappy, expensive coverage and that any "reforms" will be at best superficial, and at worse a boon for the insurance/drug companies.

Let's see how much public support there is for the plan then!

What can Americans expect from all the Right Wing owned news outlets that just refuse to tell the truth and the bedwetting, scared, paid off, reporters.

Reporters who would rather scratch up some poll to justify their editorializing than get out in the public and see what the serious people really want.

Ed of the Ed Show laid out the need for health care reform last night in black and white and made the necessity for it so clear and plain that a young child could understand it. If you have insurance, get seriously sick, can't do your job and lose it, you won't be able to pay your insurance payments and you'll lose your coverage. As it stands now, from that point on you are on your own and stand to lose everything you own due to the costs of care and hospitalization. There needs to be some sort of safety net for situations such as this.

that things aren't going to change as much as we were promised. I'm extremely concerned with the apparent WH bumbling and ineptitude in handling this important issue. Until there's campaign finance reform and regulation of media monopolies not much is going to change.

Calls for "the media" to be a non-partisan fact checker are an exercise in futility. The corporate media represents its own interest and promotes whatever bullshit benefits its bottom line.

Another NBC. Prostitute that cant shoot straight.Now the Network that Brought you Todd is ready to bring you a New Refreshing Look at the News.
Just when you thought that NBC.was selling out,we bring you Jenna Bush.

I just threw up in my mouth a little with this.

What is it going to take for the White House to grow a pair and actually lead rather than follow?

I know, don't hold my breath.

Now I'm depressed and I'm going to hide in my bed. (Maybe I should join the other half of America and start taking anti-depressants?)

Maybe Obama being abandoned by his dad, makes him want to suck up to and bend over for everyone so they'll like him.

But he is not his way to compromising his way out a a good bill into a watered down bill that will only increase costs.

Guess who will the be the first to blame him for it when it passes and flops... and guess who will still not like him when it is all over??/

You guessed it, the Republicans.

"subsidies he expects to give the uninsured so they can buy into the system" - So we'll give poor people money that they can give to rich insurance companies, so the rich insurance companies get even richer and their stranglehold on our political system can grow. They'll have more money to buy more politicians so we will NEVER get any sort of public option. Awesome.

It's too late. Our government has already been bought and sold. Big business owns the Senate, House and, it seems, the Presidency. You? You'll get nothing and like it. Public opinion actually supports a public option, but we can't get it. Why? Because we don't have the millions to buy influence that businesses do.

Campaign finance reform (serious reform) is the only way to solve this and that'll never happen either, because big business won't allow it.

When they can't use market power to put competitors out of business, they buy them up or buy up Congress and have the rules rewritten.

I would rather full nationalization of the health care system, BANISH Wall Street completely from health care.

But short of that the must have is HR 676, single payer, at the minimum.

This 'change of tactics' is more fanfare for tomfoolery and vast profiteering by the Troika of Big Insurance, Big Pharma and Big AMA.

He has already cut the deals.

If I was the head of the Progressive Dems, here is what I would say to Pres. Obama, Rahm, Axelrod and the rest of these clueless "it's still 1994, isn't it?" Democrats:
"Sirs, our constituents have our backs, and we will easily be re-elected in 2010. Unfortunately, the Blue Dogs will not, and neither will you in 2012 if you proceed in your rightward Republican/Blue Dog ass-kissing direction. If the Republicans get elected in the next two elections, they will enact their legislation and destroy what is left in this country that they didn't destroy last time, they will be crushed by the American public, and we will rise as the true voice of what America wants. So go ahead - FUCK US OVER AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS!!!"

to describe this fiasco, and that is helping to fuel the confusion.
This process has Nothing to do with Health Care....there is nothing essentially wrong with Health Care in America.

The problem is that millions of people have NO ACCESS to the health care services they need because they've been priced out of the system, or because they're being discriminated against for being sick.

All the President and the Congress appear to be doing is shuffling the cards behind their backs to ensure that the Health Insurance Corporations and the Pharma Corporations can continue to rape US citizens, and then continue to funnel portions of their ill-gotten profits into the coffers of the politicians - so they can continue to pass legislation that keep them on the gravy train.

This isn't even going to be Health Insurance Reform
when all is said and done!!! Millions will still not have access to health care and all we'll be doing is shoveling more taxpayer money into corpora-fascist hands. It's just a different version of TARP for insurance companies instead of banks.

We are so-o-o screwed....once again by the Corporate Fascist pigs who are in control.

that Obama and his Corporatist handlers are betting that We The People will continue to sit on our fat asses in front of our puters blogging out our discontent, without actually actively opposing this health insurance reform fiasco.

Well, the French Aristocracy didn't see it coming either...

"Feed them a bogus public option".

STILL doesn't get it. Insurance is useless! If there is going to be a public option, then let it truly be public: the option to join medicare. Anything less is the same old bullshit. What is his friggin' problem (aside from being owned by the insurance companies)?

Obama is a corporatist.
See: Obama wins, Dean dismissed from DNC.
see Obama's $20Mill in donations from INS and pharma.

http://www.opensecrets.org

I guess all those $5-25 donors don't count.

Exactly

A public option has to be included in health insurance reform to lower costs. It's the only thing that will. Even the supporters of the co-ops say those won't lower costs, but will only create more competition which MIGHT lower costs.

Of course, this argument would have been much, much simpler if Obama had just said he wanted to expand Medicare to include everybody.

He plans to list specific goals that any health insurance reform plan that arrives at his desk must achieve .. including the level of subsidies he expects to give the uninsured so they can buy into the system.

No one should have to PAY for INSURANCE to receive BASIC MEDICAL CARE.

PERIOD.

Govt subsidies to buy health insurance are NOT the solution. It's just another giveaway from the Treasury to the Corporations.

This is NOT why I voted for Obama.

With all due respect .. F U Sir!

"Oh, he winked twice with his left eye while he was removing that speck with the first phalanx of the index finger of the right hand, clearly he is supporting universal healthcare even though he just said no to it. Oh, this Obama... such a great poker player! Let's sit there, and let's hope some more..."

Change Hope you can pretend in.

I won't do it. I refuse to have a corporate drone determine whether or not I get to have a broken arm set because I already had an arm that could break.

If there is no public option then there is no real reform. That is not change,and we definitely can't believe in it. Obama is more than disappointing. I refuse to give any more money to the Democratic Party until and if, I ever see any Change.

I sense Obama's strategy all along was to throw out some possible alternatives in the form of bills regarding healthcare reform, sit back, watch what both the Republicans AND Democrats say and do, and then articulate his message accordingly. This next phase is simply another in a series of calculated moves prior to throwing down all of his chips and revealing his cards. We will now see if he is intent on re-election or getting healthcare reform on the books. He's already intimated he will risk re-election for healthcare reform passage. Seeing will be believing. I personally do not see him winning either way. If he softens the bill for approval, he loses his political base to the point of probably re-election loss. If he runs roughshod over opposition and succeeds on healthcare, he subjects himself to the inevitable right wing revenge machine that will paint him as a spending spree president that must be stopped. Given the average collective intelligence of this country, that could very well turn the tide against him come re-election. The one big game changer would be the economy. If we are successfully beyond this recession and jobs come back by election day, he will have formidable ammunition against these charges. Let's hope he recognizes a good set of cards when he sees them.

for your lack of "2-week tunnel vision".
I don't know how this will play out, but I'm pretty sure that the know-it-all anti-Obama crowd here won't be right in the end either. Although they'll try damn hard to re-write history and prove they "knew it all along".
If we get a public option, they'll simply tell everyone that it doesn't matter, because it's not single-payer, so Obama sold us out anyway.
Jeebus, this site and Kos make me feel teh Krazy...

But he still won't commit on a serious public option? This is not a change in tactics in any way. He is being deliberately vague in the hopes of sabotaging real reform while deflecting blame for the sabotage elsewhere.

Obama is not a dumb man. He is well aware that a strong public option is the only real reform element in any proposal. He doesn't want a strong public option - or at least he doesn't want one as much as he wants insurance money for his corporate Dems.

I reserve judgment.
*

he will remain agnostic about whether the plan must include a robust public option.

So he is agnostic about the biggest promise of his campaign? Sometimes I think he got his big brain by sucking is spine up into it. I'm so sick of him playing nice with the repugs I could puke. He should be pushing to do the right thing regardless of what Republicans have to say aobut it.

Obama’s health-care promises are being exposed by the details of the actual legislation, and we WILL see costs rise. Support the goal of covering all individuals through private health insurance! http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/issues/i...

Oh yeah, I'm going to go fight for the Insurance companies to be able to continue screwing us right away. I want to make sure Insurance companies can continue to refuse who is covered based on their health. I want to make sure that a quarter of every dollar I spend on health goes into Insurance industry pockets. I want Insurance companies to continue to control when I can see a doctor and what doctor I can see. That's a wonderful idea.

NOT!

You freaking moron....

I never knew the U.S. Chamber really cared about ME....

Jeebus, the trolls really are clueless...

Other countries provide health coverage through private insurance companies. But this is the United States and our system and private insurance companies in this country are so corrupt that we'll never achieve a workable solution if we rely on them.

I agree that Obama's plan (even though there really isn't an "Obama Plan") or the ideas that have been floated as being parts of his plan aren't adequate. However, that's because they don't go far enough. We need to eliminate private insurance companies altogether.

Maybe. But it also may be too little, too late. Obama has botched this horribly and failure will belong to him.

The only people who thought the Republicans were negotiating in good faith were Obama, some Senate Democrats, and people currently institutionalized for major psychosis.

67 comments

Login or Register to post comments.