From the Politico:

The Conservative Patients' Rights Action Fund -- the first group out of the box opposing Obama's healthcare plan -- has launched a second round of its campaign on the issue, a source involved in the group says.

The campaign focuses on Obama's proposal to set $634 billion in the federal budget aside for healthcare reform, and links the issue to the Congress's treatment of bonuses for AIG executives.

“Isn’t it amazing folks in Congress were shocked the plan THEY passed allowed those huge bonuses for AIG?" asks Rick Scott, the former healthcare executive who chairs the group, in a new television ad to be released tomorrow. "Now some in Congress want to raise taxes and spend $634 billion for the President’s healthcare overhaul - - WITHOUT even seeing all the details of his plan. They just never seem to learn."

Ah, yes, Rick Scott. Funny, the details the Politico leaves out of their stories! From Christopher Hayes in The Nation:

Having Scott lead the charge against healthcare reform is like tapping Bernie Madoff to campaign against tighter securities regulation. You see, the for-profit hospital chain Scott helped found--the one he ran and built his entire reputation on--was discovered to be in the habit of defrauding the government out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

This is the man who will be delivering what Politico called the "pro-free-market message."

A Texas lawyer who shared a business partner with George W. Bush, Scott started his health company, Columbia Hospital Corporation, in 1987. Its growth was meteoric, expanding from just a few hospitals to more than 1,000 facilities in thirty-eight states and three other countries in 1997. As his firm gobbled up chains, like the Frist family's Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), it became the largest for-profit hospital chain in the country. By 1994, Columbia/HCA was one of the forty largest corporations in America, and Scott had acquired a reputation as the Gordon Gecko of the healthcare world. "Whose patients are you stealing?" he would ask employees at his newly acquired hospitals.

He promised to put nonprofit hospitals--which he insisted on referring to as "nontaxpaying" hospitals--out of business and touted his company's single-minded pursuit of profit as a model for the nation's entire healthcare system. "What's happening in Washington is not healthcare reform," he told the New York Times in 1994. "Healthcare reform is happening in the marketplace."

The press portrayed Scott as a guru to be admired and feared, "a private capitalist dictator," in the words of one Princeton health economist. "Probably the lowest body fat of anybody I've been in business with," his partner told the Times.

"Other hospitals were intimidated," recalls John Schilling, who worked for Columbia/HCA in the 1990s. Scott was "like the bully that would come into town and if you didn't sell to him or partner with him, he would open up shop across the street from you and put you out of business."

Not long after joining the company in 1993 as the supervisor of reimbursement for the Fort Myers, Florida, office, Schilling noticed things weren't quite kosher. "They were looking for ways to maximize reimbursement...which ultimately would improve the bottom line."

One way they did this was to fudge the costs on their Medicare expense reports. They were "basically keeping two sets of books," says Schilling. The company would maintain an internal expense report, what it called a "reserve" report, which accurately tallied its expenses. "And then they would have a second report, which...they would file with the government, which was more aggressive." That report would "include inflated costs and expenses they knew weren't allowable or reimbursable. The one they filed with government might claim $5 million and the reserve would claim $4.5." Columbia/HCA would pocket the difference.

It wasn't just happening in Florida, and it wasn't just fraudulent Medicare expense reports. Around the country, dozens of whistle-blowers like Schilling stepped forward to file lawsuits under the False Claims Act, charging the company with sundry forms of chicanery: kickbacks to doctors in exchange for referrals, illegal deals with homecare agencies and filing false data about the use of hospital space.

By 1997 the FBI was investigating Columbia/HCA. Days after agents raided company facilities armed with search warrants, Scott was forced to resign. In 2000 the company pleaded guilty to fraud and agreed to pay the government $840 million. Other civil settlements would follow, ultimately totaling a staggering $1.7 billion, making it the largest fraud case in American history.

(Scott was never criminally charged and continues to deny wrongdoing. His spokesperson did not respond to repeated interview requests.)

But in Washington there's no such thing as permanent disgrace, and as the healthcare debate heats up, Scott has established himself as a go-to source for reporters looking to hear from the opposition. He's been quoted in the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post. He's been on Fox, of course, railing against President Obama's efforts to control healthcare costs. He appeared on CNN, where (as Media Matters noted) host Jessica Yellin never saw fit to notify viewers that the man she introduced as running "a media campaign to limit government's role in the healthcare system" once ran a company that profited mightily from ripping off that government.

Indeed, if there's one thing that's most galling about Scott's antigovernment jihad--and most emblematic--it's that for all his John Galt bluster, he made his fortune (which, yes, he still has) in no small part thanks to steady contract fees from the Great Society's entitlement programs.

Congressman Pete Stark, a veteran of the last bruising round of fighting over healthcare reform, remembers Scott all too well. Stark recently sent his colleagues a letter hoping to refresh their memories. Calling Scott a "swindler," the letter said, "If he is the conservative spokesperson against healthcare reform, there is no debate."



Login or Register to post comments.

16 comments

Neither one of these parties is going to bring universal healthcare. Closest you'll get is universal mandated health insurance. Big, big difference. Mr. Government will tell you that like your car, you have to have it. I am quite sure that will not make any insurance more affordable. Hasn't work with auto insurance. They all collude and set their prices.

I'm an US American and a pedestrian, so I don't have to pay auto insurance, other than what's included in my bus/transit fares. This I can't choose to avoid paying.

Joe the Plumber.

There is no such thing a permanent disgrace in DC as long as you're a Rethug.

Adolph Eichmann and Tom DeLay in a joint venture to open a new extermination company to offer its services in Jewish neighbohoods?

Ya know, if I was this SOB Scott, I'd STFU before people in COngress decide to look into my thievery. But, what the HEll do I know, I'm not rich...

if you try to point this out, the wingnuts will just say that the liberals are trying to use smear tactics against Scott.

of the past twenty years it the death of disgrace. No matter how big of a mess a person makes of his life or the lives of those around him, there can always be a "rebirth", complete with rehab, confession and forgiveness. How real these rebirths are vary from case to case. This one would appear to be about .25 of an inch deep. Can't these jerks just skulk off to their mansions, complete with their ill-gotten riches and leave the rest of the world alone? Guess not.

all of that coupled with hubris, utter lack of remorse and a sense of entitlement that is unbelievable. Rather than STFU and just fading into the sunset, this guy grabs a soapbox. He needs to be embarassed, humiliated and shamed away.

I don't think Scott - and all the other republicans you're thinking of - feel they've done anything wrong. They don't think there's anything to forgive. It's not a matter of ethics, it's just a question of whether your lawyers and spokesmen can keep you from being found guilty.

And even then (Scooter Libby, Larry Craig) you're just a guy whose lawyer wasn't good enough. What's to forgive?

Disgrace didn't die - you're just looking at a whole class of people that don't have enough ethics to feel bad about anything they or their peers might do.

Maybe this is one of those fundemental philosophical differences. The liberal thinks, "What is ethical for me to do?" And the conservative thinks, "What is god or the government going to punish me for having done?"

Conservative Patient Rights? Something like:

You have the right to die [if that right does not infringe upon your state's rights (and you don't mind going to hell)]. Any predeterminate conditions you have can and will be used against you. You have the right to the physician you can afford. If you cannot afford a physician, an emergency room physician will be appointed for you along with the hospital's attorneys who will hound you, your children and your children's children for every last penny we can bleed from your miserable existence. Do you understand these rights?

NB

Important caveat: you don't have the right to die if you choose to do so (e.g. assisted suicide).

Who's surprised that the Reslugs can't find anyone who isn't a conman or criminal in their party.

The threads so far seem all too rooted in reality.. I do think we need to reinstitute Shame as a force and I do want universal health care and the insurance companies, seemingly evil by nature, can go to hell. We don't need to spend the 30% or so of our health care costs on insurance processing increasing people's insecurity and suffering while the insurance industry plays their games. The bastids have made health care into an industry and we are their widgets, to be tweaked for profit.. if we're really lucky, the industry might be honest but that seems less likely all the time.

The whole dynamic plays into keeping regular folks dazed while some consciousless rich folks grind their bones to make bread.

But it's Spring, right? Dharma doesn't demand results anyway, only right action.. so we plod on, do our best, tell the truth as we know it, get smarter and we don't stop. Ghandi said something about whatever we do is unimportant but it is very important that we do it. Our satisfaction is right action.

Don't forget Jeb Bush's role in Medicare fraud:

Bush Family Value$

from Mother Jones, 1992.

I have to say, I agree with Rick Scott. I oppose the Obama plan, which is to leave the current system intact, and engage in borrowing/taxation to pay for covering the poor. This crap about digitalizing the medical records, - if it would have produced appreciable savings, the medical industry would have already done it, to increase shareholder value.

Needless to say, I don't agree with the Republican alternative, which is, screw the 48,000,000 without medical coverages.

Like Bill Clinton, and more recently, Governor Dean pointed out, the Europeans and Japanese cover everyone at 11% of GDP while our system cost 16% of GDP and leave the 48M uncovered. We need to copy what these other countries are doing. That is the fiscally responsible approach.

If we continue to run up the national debt, without a plan to turn the deficits around, the foreign countries we rely on to finance our debt aren't going to continue to lend. The first thing is to not borrow and spend if a cost effective alternative is available.

Unfortunately, I think Obama is a little too interested in corporate welfare. As a result, I think the federal borrowing bubble is headed for a hard landing.

So lets get this straight this guy is being used as the front man for the insurance companies and private hospitals?

And they think this is going to help their cause?

Leave the man be to wreck his own cause.

If you want universal health care for all.

or

Just want insurance to mean insurance, i.e. pay for insurance AND not have your coverage denied when you are unfortunate to get Cancer or whatever, your policy cancelled, and blacklisted and uninsurable.

Leaving the government to cover you as the last hope, assuming you can find a doctor or hospital to take medicare payments.

Isn't the taxpayer already subsidizing insurance profits by this cancer infecting the insurance industry?

People like Mr. Scott are the ones that started this train wreck of cutting benefits and "high risk patients" (= You just got sick).

Once good companies like blue cross (both for profit and non profit)

Must sign a contract with the devil and follow suite to stay alive, or they just end up with higher % of expensive patents on their books.

This is true even if they only deny customers thrown away by other greedy insurance companies,(and even did not follow suite by denying coverage or cancelling policies of existing patents,) because the greedy insurance companies have higher profits and over time will be able to get larger and larger market share.

Hey President Obama, why not just put a program in place like is used with Auto Insurance that insurance companies must all take a equal % of high risk customers/patents onto their books.

This would in one simple measure eliminate over half of the problems with health care.

This could be the only thing done.

or

Will give time for debate and discussion among all americans on how to reform and to what degree health care reform needs to be changed based on the majority of what Americans want.

Instead of just the "Major stake holders" want to do behind closed doors outside the view of the general public.

If your life and health do not count as qualifying you as a "Major Stake Holder" What does ?

16 comments

Login or Register to post comments.