I've had it with the traditional media. Had it. They are the laziest of bums. Remember when being a journalist meant actually researching a subjec
I've had it with the traditional media. Had it. They are the laziest of bums. Remember when being a journalist meant actually researching a subject? Not anymore. Now you just keep repeating smears prompulgated by the not-even-trying-to-hide-their-bias Moonie Times with nary a fact-check to stop them from smearing our new Speaker of the House. Was CNN nearly as concerned with Hastert and the very real likelihood that he knew and turned a blind eye to Foley's peccadillos?
As with the Obama smear, the Times story is based entirely on quotes from unnamed sources. Yet, instead of investigating the report, CNN's Lou Dobbs has covered the story every day for six straight days - Feb 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 - amplifying the attacks and repeating the inaccuracies.
Read TP's fact-checking here...maybe not as interesting as SIX DAYS of inaccurate reporting, but still, you'd think the truth would seep in at some point.