Lieberman on "electing a Democrat in '08" Oh, wait!
By scarce Sunday Dec 16, 2007 5:42pm(John Amato helped too)
Remember this from '06?
"I want Democrats to be back in the majority in Washington and elect a Democratic president in 2008. This man [Ned Lamont] and his supporters will frustrate and defeat our hopes of doing that." --07/06/06, Connecticut Primary Debate
There's a word we use to describe politicians that say one thing to get elected and then do something completely the opposite once they get their power on. Right, Joe? What's that word? You can say it....And it's not Scoop Jackson. which is two words...Here's a hint. The name of this blog is Crooks-&-?
Senator Joe Lieberman (U*-CT) got called out this afternoon on CNN's The Situation Room by John King. Even the traditional media has noticed there was something funny about what Lieberman said, trying in vain to woo democratic voters in Connecticut in the summer of '06, and reconciling that with his endorsement of a Republican today, John McCain for president in 2008. If you listened closely you could almost hear the air seeping out of his endorsement for McCain as the video rolled. Lieberman sputtered and spat out a rationalization but all it amounted to was that he hates what the democratic party has become. Harry Reid, are you listening yet?
Download | play Download | play (h/t Heather for the vids)
(via CNN) KING: Senator Lieberman, let me bring you into the conversation. I want to know how you came about the decision, a dramatic decision, an Independent Democrat as you call yourself, to endorse this Republican candidate for president.
Before you answer, I want you to listen to something you said in our own campaign just about 17 months ago. In July 2006, you were campaigning against a Democrat, Ned Lamont. Much of your party, as you well know, abandoned you in that primary. And you said this to Ned Lamont about the stakes in the 2008 presidential election.
KING: Why important now, Senator Lieberman, to elect a Republican President in 2008?
LIEBERMAN: Well, what I was saying in that is exactly the reason why I'm supporting John McCain today. Look, I'm from a tradition of the Democratic Party that goes back to harry Truman and Hubert Humphrey, Scoop Jackson, progressive on domestic policy, strong on foreign and defense policy. My opponent last year and the group around him represented an entirely different point of view, and I stood and fought them. And I said if they won the primary, I worried that they'd embolden and strengthen that element within the Democratic Party.
Sorry---Joe---that ain't cutting it...
Login or Register to post comments.
frits!
As we used to say in New Yawk..."are you for real or fuh fake". Fuh real it's ALL fake.
Get rid of this USER and the rest. Power back to the states, make assholes like this irrelevant.
Listening to Ralph Nader interview right now on the radio.
Funny how some Democrats give him shit for costing Gore the Presidency, but none of them give him credit for preventing Lieberman from becoming Vice President.
LIEberman is a self serving scumbag. He really belongs in the Bush administration. There he would be surrounded by friends and other traitorous assholes. Denying that asshole a chance to be VP was almost worth Bush stealing the 2000 election.
That vid of Joe is quiet the find.
liberdouche gives scumbags a bad name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Joe is definitely an inside-the-beltway politician. He is an Establishment man who doesn't "get" the real American public. So sad. They are so quick to forget who elected them.
Wow - what a stream of garbage. Just keep running your mouth and home it sounds like a reason I guess.
McCain can't stop giggling it is so surreal.
NH voters, please recall your idiot.
John King asked a question that Wolf Blitzer would never ask...
John McCain looks very uncomfortable.
Wow, Lieberman lied and backstabbed the Democratic Party. About the only thing I can agree with him on is most of the candidates really aren't worth backing. Dodd, Kucinich and Gravel are the only ones who don't make me gag.
Until scumbags like this toad are made to pay a political price they are going to continue to stand up and lie
thru their teeth. as we see him do here.
I'm sure Joe is thankful for his many friends in the 'Democrat' Party who helped him defeat the Democratic nominee
in CT, Mr. Ned Lamont.
Joe's pretty busy sucking McCain off right now so I'll give him some help....
Thanks Bill!
Thanks Chuck!
Thanks Hillary!
And special thanks to my protege Senator Obama.
And me, I just wanna say it was an honor to be able to thank those great Democrats for you Joe!
An honor!
Liberman was an opportunist and charlatan in 2000 and remains one. His endorsement will prove to be useless. Hopefully the true independents of New Hampshire will do as I did in 2000 and sit on on your hands rather than vote for a charming snake.
Sorry, Nader gets nothing. What an outrageous statement! (for reasons I won't belabor) Guess not having Liarman is a great tradeoff for those hundreds of thousands of innocents dead and environmental protections that would have been in place 8 years ago.
Thanks, Nader... ya BOOB!
Look up the word asshole in the dictionary and you'll find a picture of Joe Lieberman next to it.
Why is it that war-loving turds like Lieb and the Shrub evoke Harry Truman every chance they get? Ol' Harry would have kicked both of them in the balls a long time ago.
Is Joe drunk? Or just a slurrerer?
Is it just me or does it look like McCain is getting a BJ below that splitscreen while Liberman goes on that long tangent to nowhere.
AND here is the true face of a fucking bastard repug who says he is a democrat.
when he gets to hell..........his lips will be permanently opened and glued to bush's asshole.
Joe you are so transparent and such a traitor to the USA and it is becoming so apparent but I guess it is hard to see from your gefiltefish bowl. AIPAC Joe would have never thrown his endorsement behind McCain unless there was a promise for an Iran war. McCain is so desperate and broke he will gladly fill the likud/neocon/AIPAC vacuum for money that was going to Rudy before his impulsion. This schmuck will be on McCain's VP ticket and that will be a good thing for their further demise. A vote for McCain is a vote to do the dirty work of Likud and go to war with Iran.
Israel centric Lieberman wants to take out Iran. John McCain is on the bus.
I just could not figure out why the Des Moines Register endorsed two of the most hawkish candidates. This past Sunday on C-Spans Washington Journal the Des Moines Register's editor Carolyn Washburn said that they had given their endorsement to these two candidates because they could "hit the ground running". Yeah right.
Both of these warhawks will hit the ground running right towards Iran...Lieberman loves that
Can't stand the guy, never could.
"We're at war against a brutal enemy that attacked us on 9-11"
We're now at war with Saudi Arabia?!?!?
equilibrio @ 3:
Meant to quote this at #13. Nader is that really bad smell in the refrigerator. Surly old shit gives himself way too much credit. The pukes PAID this piece of crap to run in that election.
so Mccain asked Lieberman to do it?? It wasnt a decision coming form lieberman himself?? Man, this whole thing is getting lamer andlamer by the second. In case anyone is wondering, Lieberman is a fucking Republican. the only reason he won't officiially chenge the letters in his name is becuase the second he does hell sink into the oblivion of nothingness that is the republican party. Joe ...blow me!!!
crazytown @ 13:
So, we can count you as a Lieberman supporter, then?
This is why Lieberman gave his support to McCain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-zoPgv_nYg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWGa9ViY7G8&NR=1
PNAAC Minister @ 21:
Good call.
McCain has been noted for aggressively going after the Conservative base.
Meanwhile, Joe Lieberman is saying the Democrats should marginalize their base.
Interesting how the so-called "moderates" always seem to be so far to the right.
"If they won the primary I worried that they'd embolden and strengthen that element within the Democratic Party."
Embolden? Where have I heard that word before? Language is something that is very subtle but tremendously important, and I think in that quote Joe was trying to implicitly associate anti-war Democrats with terrorists.
Shame on him.
Joe Lieberman has 11 months left of his political career. Oh, sure, he'll still be in office.
But once we expand our Senate majority in November 2008, he will no longer have any leverage. He will be marginalized. He will be stripped of his committee leadership. And he will be powerless until he retires.
Watched the folks from the Washington Institute on Middle East Policy on c-span the other day. They could care less about the NIE report on Iran or what the IAEA's Director El Baradei has to say, they have their agenda and come hell or high water they are more than likely going to figure out a way to bomb Iran.
These are right wing radicals and that is all there is to it.
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateI01.php
As soon as he began to talk, I fell asleep. What did he say?
One of our great modern american poiltical myths is that Ralph Nader cost Al Gore the presidency in 2000. No it was Joe Lieberman being on the ticket (see 'Mississippi Burning' and Nixon's Southern Strategy).
Good riddance Joe and thanks for finally coming out of the closet.
Btw, maybe someone should look into exactly how Joe ever got on that ticket.
Smoke coming out of Joes Ears. Smokin' Joe
If Lieberman gets kicked out of the party by Reid and the Democratic leadership, don't the Dems lose their majority party status? If this is right, does it make any sense to kick him out and lose a majority in each of the Senate committees, etc?
Richard @ 34:
loose what we aint got anyway? jesus weeze fucked!
Richard @ 34:
Correct. That is why the Dems just have to sit by and put up with Joe's sh!t . . for now.
I feel compelled to comment, but I am so sickened by this two-faced, anti-America, whining sack of scum, that I am at a loss for words. The voters of CT deserve him.
Joe Lieberman...Tonight's worst person in the world!
Keith Oberman
PNAAC Minister @ 36:
I agree. They got to win this next election, increase their Senate majority and drum him out of the party then. Any action to expel him before that would be masochistic (although I guess there is now the real possibility that he will now bolt the party and enable the Republicans to become the majority now)
Richard @ 34:
Does it matter? Even with a majority, the Dems in the Senate don't have the balls to stand up to Bush and Co. anyway.
I know...Olbermann
If this bonehead could tell the difference between a Democrat and a Republican then he wouldn't be the Republica-Crat that he has been. Personally I find Lieberman to be so full of shit that I don't care what he says anymore. I hope he's proud of the stupid choices he has made!
Reid just put off vote on telecom wiretap immunity until after Christmas recess under threat of filibuster by Dodd!!!!
All you Al Gore supporters... just remember...Gore selected a closet Con-Repub as VP candidate
......Lieberschmuck.
That IRRESPONSIBLE decision ALONE exposes Gore's blind spot and judgment abilities.
Edwards/Webb '08!
Romney will lose to Edwards in a repeat of FDR 1932 landslide. MARK MY WORDS.
The corporate media's "BLACK MAN versus WHITE WOMAN" won't sell.
NEXT.....
Don't agree..! In this hysterical yahoo nation,one guy on ticke
...ticket has to have MILITARY experience!
That's why I say Edwards with either Gen.Clark, Sen.Webb or Gen. Zinsecki as veep.
It's all about winning first!
Shit, I'd take Clinton/Clark too !!!
Clinton's name ALONE means it's 2fer! ( you get Bill)! PLUS a NATO commander that liberated Kosovo with ZERO caualties.
And the name Clinton reminds everyone of that “nightmare” of 8 years of PEACE & PROSPERITY we had to endure!
Remember...Yahoo nation needs a GI JOE on the ticket to feel all compfy & secure !!!
And democrats have MOST of military support!
Gen. Eaton is the most recent, "THANK GOD, the Democrats controll Congress" as said last month on Bill Mahr. ( he was the 50th RETIRED General that has expressed that sentiment)
In an IDEAL sane world, Feingold/Sanders or Kucinich/Nader would be my pick, BUT we don't live in an IDEAL world.
So I go for the PRAGMATIC democratic ticket.
That's better than ANY,ANY,ANY Repugnant !
what a scumbag this lieberman...
his chances for reelection are nearly inexistent
let him play the gadfly for a couple more years and then KICK - OUT
Will someone please ask Senator Harry Reid, why it is that Joe Lieberman, is still caucusing with Democrats?
This ass hole should have been dismissed from the party, when he changed his affiliation
What the hell is wrong with these people?
Joementum strikes again.....
I will always remember the look on Joe's face, when Cheney was
cutting him to shreds in the VP debate...Like a kicked dog,
wanting to kiss the boots of his tormentor.
A gutless coward through and through.
Huh? Iraq attacked on us on 9/11?
great article about our relationship with Israel by Scott Ritter
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/ritter.php?articleid=12064
The jerk was kicked out of the Democratic party, and the best CNN can do is refer to him as an "independant democrat"? That implies that he is still a democrat, when in fact he was kicked out. See how CNN twists and distorts?
[Quit spamming the threads with the same off topic message. Thank you-Sitemonitor]
His posturing doesn't even make sense! John McCain is not even CLOSE to progressive on social issues.
Mad_World @ 15:
The Very Rich don't bother to enunciate. They don't have to.
Dr. Matt @ 48:
Where ya been, man? They used their fleet of "manned and unmanned aerial vehicles" to attack us. Thought everyone knew this!
McCain/Lieberman Unity '08 ticket? The
faux centristestablishmentarian party now has its candidates.Holy Joe Lieberman is a small and petty man.
I first saw signs of this when he lost his primary and refused to honor the wishes of the voters.
And Now, he's endorsing a republican because no democrat asked him to endorse them?!
I honestly can't tell if he's delusional, or just has one huge ego. Maybe its both.
Lieberman's backing of McCain was the topic on Washington Journal this morning. Both of them got savaged by both party members and the independents.
Then there was Tweety on his show tonight fawning all over Lieberman like he was Pope anointing McCain as the second coming. It's more like he won't even be coming in second.
It would be worth it to hand over the blame for a bad Senate to the Republicans by totally excommunicating Lieberman from his faux Democratic party affiliation. This won't happen of course because of the perks at stake for having a majority. One of the many flaws in our political system that a strident ideologue can hijack an entire branch of Congress.
JasonS @ 24:
That's an irrational juxtaposing which will not be addressed. How literal of you.
I heard that whining little prick on CNN say he was endorsing McCain "because we're at war with the people that attacked us on 9/11", or some such shit. The vacuum-headed "journalist" didn't call him on that Bald Face Big Lie, either.
How many Iraqi's were on the hijacked jets, JoJo?
Lieberman: "THE WAR LOVER'S WAR LOVER".
"We're at war against a brutal enemy who attacked us on 9/11".....Oh gee, why am I not surprised this was trotted out immediately?
Thank God that Al Gore lost or this depraved degenerate would be right in line for the presidency.
DOUCHE. BAG.
"He supported the war against Saddam Insane, as I did, and blah blah blah...."
And then McCain comes on and starts stammering and I'm thinking who the @%$*# is voting for these people?
And considering the majority of Americans are against Iraq, both McCain and Lieberman can now STFU and wait out their terms quietly, we've all heard enough.
Drop Dead, Joe.
You fascist enabling low-life. You're an American first...remember.
Holy Joe has finally come out the closet but I can't understand why McCain would even encourage such a suicidal endorsement. Of course, they're both suffering from tertiary syphilis.
How could the same state (CT) give us the integrity and decency of Dodd then go 180 degrees into the duplicity and sleaze of Lieberman?
lumberjack @ 8:
Um, the idiot is Senatorof Conn..
As Bush would say,
'Liebermans does suck'.
Preacher Boob @ 68:
He says that about all of his boyfriends
Radhika @ 66:
Great question.
Radhika @ 66:
Great question.
How?
Who cares what Lieberman thinks? He's irrelevant. He has no constituency.
"Centrist " if you think expanding the " war" and OCCUPATION of Iraq and other Muslim countries is a " centrist" position , you have got to be kidding and we are in big trouble and his support of McCain was based on " going after the Islamist , the ones that attacked us on 9 - 11 " . Strange after six years , we still haven't got the culprits of 9 - 11, who the hell is he talking about , (anybody opposed to the Iraqi occupation) .
The FACT of the matter is Lieberman has the SAME position as all the NEOCONS , the FAR right war mongers AND McCain . OCCUPY Iraq illegally , keep them there indefinitely , allowing the Bush Regime to financially RAPE Iraq , by buying up their banks , telecom etc. as desgined by BREMMER and his ORDER 39 and at the same time Israeli Firster Lieberman will make Israel happy, because they're all for the occupation of Iraq as well .
I just saw Joe on the news here (Bay Area) saying: "I know it's unusual for a democrat to endorse a republican for president..." and Joe is right. AND it still hasn't happened because, message to Joe, no matter what HE calls himself, HE IS NOT A DEMOCRAT!
Joe, you make Quisling look like a patriot.
I can take only so much of Dumb and Dumber. Both of these political hacks have terminal panderitis. Get me the barf bag, please.
I live in Illinois and I sent Ned Lamont $20.00.
I know at least I did something.
Impeach him, then
Impale the Preposterous Putz on Lieberman's nose.
is it just me or is leiber-publican starting to look more and more like the JOKER of batman???
are we expecting repug-supporting reid, who sidestepped protocol to try to ram through the telecom immunity, to actually do anything about LIEberman? LIEberman has been insulting the democratic party and thumbing his nose at whatever passes for democratic leadership.
LIEberman and reid can kiss my entire ass!
Good move UConn. You have a great Senator, Chris Dodd and a pisher, joe liarman. Only 4 more years of irrelevant or is that ir"elephant" joe.
I'm so sick of being a Democrat.
Hasn't anyone thought about why this nutjob, Lieberman, was the vice-presidential candidate with Gore in 2000? Was he the back-up plan, should Bush-Cheney not have been able to steal the election?
Al & Joe win, "something" happens to Al, Joe brings on Cheney to shows he's "fair & balanced" and we still get the '02 Energy meeting, 9/11, and war in Iraq. Lieberman was a very odd, last-minute choice for VP.
Maybe Gore was lucky enough to have "lost" the 2000 election afterall? Hey, let's all go shopping, no worries.
Lieberman sputtered and spat out a rationalization but all it amounted to was that he hates what the democratic party has become. Harry Reid, are you listening yet?
WTF are you talking about, scarce? Lieberman, who is not a Democrat, talks smack about the party (which is spelled with an upper-case D, by the way), and you think Harry Reid should take notice?
Notice of what? That a slime ball opportunist that bailed his own party after losing the primaries has a stick up his ass? Pray tell, what grand insight am I missing, here?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
And they say that Republicans and Liars aren't funny!
It's simply a Hail Mary pass for two aging, brain-dead farts -- McCain and Lieberman. Don't worry too much about it. Farts eventually dissipate. McCain and Lieberman will dissipate too.
Yet another transparent attempt by Comrad Liebermann to pretend that people think he's relevant.
Brawlin Dem @ 82:
So grow up, move out on your own, and join the ranks of the independents. It's really quite nice. You think for yourself while party affiliates are inevitably told how and what to think, and fewer people ask you for money under the guise of comradery (how do you party folk know who your friends are, I wonder). Plus, that little cynic inside of you will be much more free to grow and prosper (which you probably need).
pv @ 85:
This comment is fucking up the page formatting.
I'm as ADD is the next person. I fought through listening to about 30 seconds of Joe's response and then my attention wandered to watching one of the dust balls in my corner get blown around by the vents.
Sorry Joe - you lose. And this move assures you that you'll be out of a job in 5 years. You bet on a losing party and now you're hedging your bet with a losing candidate.
And did anyone else notice how peeved McCain seemed to have had the thunder stolen by this little detail?
Does Connecticut have a recall procedure for senators?
Yeah, uh-huh, Lieberputz. McCain is more Democrat than the Democrats are. And you, as opposed to Lamont, represent the country perfectly.
In fact, everyone loves you.
Might want to check if your Metamucil was spiked.
2 defense contractor whores who the media call "mavericks"
coleshack @ 43:
A Dem threatens a filibuster in a Senate led by a Dem majority leader, and an Independent Democrat endorses a Republican.
Time to cue the theme from The Twilight Zone.
float like a butterfly, sting like a bee!
uhh Joe, Joe.... Joe, wake up Joe, Joe.......Joe.....................Joe...........anyone......
Does anyone care about Joe Lieberman? by Ilya Sheyman Add to favorites View on DFA-Link
Promoted Monday, 12/17/07 @ 7:00 pm. Published Monday, 12/17/07 @ 6:16 pm
(Crossposted on DailyKos)
I thought you'd get a kick out of this. I know this is unusual, but here are some excerpts of a press release DFA issued today in response to Sen. Lieberman's (DFL-CT) endorsement of John McCain.
Here's an excerpt:
In 2006, Senator Lieberman was reelected to the Senate as the sole candidate of Connecticut for Lieberman; a political party created out of whole cloth after Senator Lieberman was resoundingly defeated by Ned Lamont in the Democratic primary. At the time, Senator Lieberman promised to caucus with the Democratic majority in the Senate and work to elect a Democrat to the White House in 2008.
And what needs to happen:
"At this point, it is clear that Joe Lieberman is done with the taxpayers of Connecticut and we are done with him," said Democracy for America Chairman and Connecticut resident, Jim Dean. "Majority Leader Harry Reid needs to pull Senator Lieberman’s committee assignments. His presence in the Democratic caucus is an insult to Connecticut voters and taxpayers, Democrats, progressives, and activists all over the country."
Game. Set. Match.
pv @ 85:
EH @ 89:
until now, I didn't believe that an asshole could echo! :lol:
Motown Blues
make me wanna holler, throw up both my hands....
float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
Holy Joe pretty much just told all of us that he supports John McInsane because McInsane is the only real Democrat in the field.
Ok, anyone who thinks Joe has not completely taken leave of his faculties after this insanity needs to have her own head examined.
a true establishment career politician: self serving.
Bravo on the hawkish way to nuance 9/11 with Iraq as one and the same with the simple word "they": rising Republican.
It looks like LIEBERMAN is trying to establish himself in the eyes of te public
that HE is to DEMOCRATS/INDEPENDENT as CHENEY is to Republicans.
Showing off that he has political muscles.
People are ahead of the GAME and WE can SEE THROUGH
all this political stunts.
The mere fact that LIEBERMANN (the war-mongering and traitor) endorsed McCain;
affirm that I will NOT waste my vote on McCain.
2-PAC
Keep your head up!
float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
This is the first time I've ever heard of a rat swimming to a sinking ship.
equilibrio @ 3:
Hey, Jagoff, don't know if you noticed or not, but the fucking anti-chri$t is the current VP. I would service Lieberman nightly if it meant that he was VP instead of darth.
Ralph Nader is a kook and should have put a gun in his mouth for the hell he has caused this nation. Instead, that loonie-toons-MF walks around like it's nothing. Somebody PLEASE shut the lid on his box.
Oh, and while you're at it, put these two losers in there with him. What a couple of washed-up nobodies.
Heathcliff @ 105:
DUDE, that is classic. Mind if I use that one? Really, I had to pick myself up off the floor.
This is news?? Of course he'd back a Repugliconn. Does it really matter which one? (OK, maybe news if he backed Ron Paul...)
Speaking of REAL NEWS, what happened in that LA car chase???
JustSickOfIt @ 107:
I'll second that!!
All you 'moderate'/'con-servative' so called democratic voters that elected this guy in CT....
Ned Lamont is looking pretty good right about now....
Poor, poor bastards...they got played in a way that can't even be described right now...
Looks like Joe has formally joined the Zell Miller wing of the Democratic Party. I expect he'll show up at the Republican convention if McCain wins the nomination. There's no need to wait to strip this liar of his Committee chairmanship. He votes with the Republicans most of the time anyway. And as far as expecting his vote to support the Democratic legislative agenda, it won't happen. In fact, he'll join the Republicans to block passage of the Democratic agenda. Isn't time to get a netroots effort together to advocate stripping him of his committee chairmanship. Perhaps, the Homeland Security Committee, of which Joe is Chairman, could get some substantive work done with a Democratic Chairman, rather than acting as a cover for the Administration's foul-ups.
I blame the dumb-ass voters of CT who voted for Jihad Joe. He's Zell Miller Lite.
There are many in CT that I would slap.
"None of the Democrats asked me for an endorsement. John McCain did." - Blow LIEberman, 12/16/07.
Does he really wonder why none of the Dems asked him for support? F you, LIEberman.
Just wanted to say "Thanks again retarded citizens of CT" (and please kill yourselves, oh wait you already have!) Happy Hollandaise!
I hope CT has learned its lesson. At least they gave us Dodd. I also remember the late/reluctant/non-existent support that several of the media-appointed front runners gave Lamont.
Who cares if its a democrat or republican as long as they will be a good leader, this is whats wrong with our country today, republicans want a republican no matter what and democrats wants a democrat no matter what... Who gives a shit what party they belong to it should be the least of our worries
Lieberman just goes whatever way the wind blows. If he had been elected as Gore's Vice President I doubt it would have meant anything. Could he have been any worse than say Dan Quail?
So let me get this straight: the smart money's on voting in a wolf in sheep's clothing? Where the hell have I seen this happen before...
Lieberman wears so many hats it's a wonder he can keep them straight. Almost hourly, he has to decide:
Am I a MOSSAD agent?
A republican?
The village idiot?
A Democrat?
An AIPAC lobbyist?
An AEI Non-Thinking Fellow?
An Independent?
An Israel dependent?
A Poly-Faced, Scum-Sucking, Mendacious, Witless Twit?
Excuse the 'where's', which sb 'wears'. My voice-translation device need a little tweaking.
[I tweaked that spelling for you-Sitemonitor]
When the democrats pick up another 6 or 7 Senate seats next year, they can tell Ole' Leibby to take a hike. He can then join the repukes who will be in the minority for a long-long time.
I had to stop the video after 2:30 minutes. I couldn't stand it anymore. I nearly puked.
Login or Register to post comments.