Neil Cavuto on Hillary's "kind of bitchy image"
By SilentPatriot Tuesday Feb 19, 2008 6:49pmMonday on the incredibly successful FOX Business Channel, Neil Cavuto brought on GOP media strategist Frank Guerra to offer some advice for Senator Clinton on how to salvage her fledgling campaign. How considerate of them.
Partial transcript via TP:
But Frank, if she has tried that to little avail in the campaign thus far and she’s trying to run away from this tough, kind of bitchy image that her critics claim that she has, wouldn’t that reinforce that image and actually help Barack Obama? In other words, isn’t she between kind of like a rock and a hard place?
Maybe Neil should have used one of his famous "Cavuto marks" on this one?
Login or Register to post comments.
frist bitch
NY TIMES REPORTS McCain had a romantic and financial relationship with a young lobbist.Just now in a bulletin on MSNBC. (The repubs are throwing McCain under the bus)
hillary is bush-lite....
screw her.
well, as i commented at TP yesterday:
well, i don’t get it, i don’t get your grief here…
hillary DOES have a B!TCHY image, and she IS trying to run away from it…
is she gonna have cavuto suspended too???
wah wah wah…
there IS a big difference between CALLING SOMEONE A B!TCH
and SAYING that someone, anyone, has a B!TCHY image.
.
and throwing out false accusations of “plagiarism”
is probably gonna add to that B!TCHY image… y’think?
I'm watchin' BO now. Let's see how long until he mentions VICKY!
Any bets?
McLover has a breaking sex scandal with a lobbyist.
Bwa.
McCain has been nasty, bad, naughty boy.....to take Larry 'Wide Stance' Craig's words...
let's see if this gets squashed by the MSM and all those well connected washington folk that have all us plebes' best interest at heart:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=1&hp&oref...
If I were him, and thank the flying spaghetti monster I'm not, I wouldn't be too quick to try and stick that tag on Hillary.
Especially considering that the first time I ever saw this idiot he was using his 'editorial comment' time to attack someone who had sent him an email he didn't like. It went something like this:
'personal attack, personal attack, personal attack, ridiculous comparison, idiotic comment about irrelevant subject, name calling, name calling, whine whine whine, totally irrelevant reply to actual subject of email followed by attack on mailer's intelligence for not "getting" it. And the big finale, compare mailer to nazi.'
I was watching and could not believe that they were allowing him to say these things. Let alone that a grown man would be spewing the entire repertoire of the most cliché internet troll on live tv with all the attitude and self righteousness of a preacher making his sunday oratory. My 8yr old nephew sounds more intelligent that this idiot.
If there was ever someone who deserved the tag 'bitch', cavuto is it.
Here is the McLover story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=1&hp&oref...
"Some say" Cavuto's got a tiny, tiny penis and has penis envy toward all strong, intelligent women because his father also had a tiny, tiny penis and was dominated and degraded by his large, muscular mother, who was rumored to have used performance enhancing drugs to dominate all of the softball and bowling leagues in town. Before and after Cavuto's birth, she was often overheard by neighbors yelling "kneel, Cavuto!". It is widely believed that is how Niel got his name. We report, you decide. Kneel, Cavuto.
getalife @ 6:
#154, thanks!
:)
Problem-solving is a 3-step process: 1) define the problem; 2) define the solution; 3) implement the solution.
Neil Cavuto is so homely looking he shouldn't criticize anyone.
I am sure that Neil Cavuto will surely be with his "bitch" and galpal, Rosy Palm tonight, wrapped up to the ceiling with pencils and hands, around his empty head.
I believe there are rumors going back many years about McCain having problems keeping his pants up. There are problems with lobbyists also. Hope this holds water.
I like strong "bitchy" women.
They don't intimidate me,or "cull" me,or make me feel any less of a man.
Men have had the compass for the last 20 centuries,and have steadily,unwaveringly,marched the World ever closer to the brink.All this macho shit is giving me indigestion already...
Of course, this won't be made a big deal like the "Chelsea being pimped" comment.
John McCain was nothing before he married Cindy as far as money goes. McCain's eyes lighted up with green dollar signs in his pupils when spotting not an owl, but a scarecrow named Cindy. Cindy McCain's father who had been a very wealthy man, is the chief reason Johnny McCain was able to run for political-elected office.
Without being a gold-digging slob/snob of the utmost, Johnny McCain would still be fantasizing about being an heir to another spoiled child, of the establishment, George W. Bush.
McCain does not wear the pants in the family when it ciomes to money and finances. Follow the McCain family money and it leads to Cindy McCain's panties. McCain must like the color pink and of course, with Cindy's financial clout, of course she would attack another candidate. The McCain's are also a two as one package, except the media will not critique this aspect of the "war hero's" life.
Well, on FOx Business only 6,000 people saw it.
getalife @ 10:
If something smells funny about this, it's probably because when they met when she was a lobbyist for the U.S.A (Urologists Society of America), which also explains a lot about the obvious holes in this story. She was a prostatute, as it were.
If she was a lobbyist, why did McCain take his pants off? To prove he wasn't McAble?
Neil Cavuto has a kind of bitchy image that he might want to work on.
Hey, just because McWeaknessforblondelobbyist is too old to cut the mustard, doesn't mean he can't lick the lid.
TonyinLA @ 1:
Obama is the little bitch!
Cavuto isn't the first to toss this kind of insult at the Senator. The sad fact is that Cavuto and his ilk don't even think they've said anything wrong.
Neil Cavuto should spend less time worrying about how Hillary can salvage her campaign and more time worrying about how FOX can salvage its dying network.
I need any input from Neil Cavuto like I need a hole in my head. I'll pass.
*
katy @ 4:
Yep, yep, and yep.
Cavuto is almost...almost...as retarded as Hannity. When will he realize Hillary is not in the running? And direct his dumbshit energy towards Obama?
Bitchy image ... bitch ...whatever. It really doesn't matter whether the word "image" is used or not. The salient word is "bitch". That's the image that Fox and friends want linked to Senator Clinton. It's part of the MSM and GOP meme and it has its base in misogyny. Male politicians are allowed to be determined and aggressive to accomplish their goals. Those are considered "leadership qualities". If a female politician is determined and aggressive, she is dismissed as "bitchy".
# 24. Obot says " Obama is the little bitch " Does Barack has anything to do with FOX's Cavuto ? Or you just stupid enough and doesn't understand.
Again, to the right Hillary Clinton is:
1. Bitchy (or a bitch)
2. Fake
3. A lesbian
4. An adultress (had an affair with Vince Foster)
5. A murdress (killed same Vince Foster)
6. A crook (whitewater)
And then they fault Bill Clinton (to no end) for sleeping around on her. I don't get them.
Jay Severin Has a Small Pen1s @ 32:
I know! I feel like I am in the twilight zone or night of the living dead! Every one is immune to all logic, reality or reason!
This is ridiculous. Regardless of how anyone feels about Cavuto, it's obvious he's wondering if the criticism of Clinton is getting to her so much she's adjusting her campaign strategy. His sentence, which starts with "if" and then uses the phrase "her critics claim" changes the total meaning of the sentence. Does anybody read for content? Why are Media Matters, TP, and this blog spreading misinformation?
It's no different than if Cavuto had said, "If John McCain gets mad over the alleged affair, won't it confirm the 'angry image' that his critics claim that he has?"
Does the left really have to sink to the level of Glenn Reynolds or Bill O'Reilly?
Seriously @ 33:
As long as it servers their needs, that's all that matters.
But it's true Hillary rubs people wrong, she is not a diplomat like Bill is.
You can't call Barack a n*gger, but you can call Hillary a b*tch?
Why is that?
"But it's true Hillary rubs people wrong. . ."
It's true sez you.
But really. Hillary only rubs Karl Rove wrong.
And, you know, it's really true that she rubs Miss Piggy Rove wrong.
In so many many senses.
Right. Hillary--who, whatever you think of her policies, is actually pretty genteel--is considered a bitch by these people, but Barbara Bush--who clearly thinks the world was created to kiss her flabby ass--is "America's Grandmother."
Neil Cavuto's the real bitch.
Neil Cavuto brought on GOP media strategist Frank Guerra to offer some advice for Senator Clinton on how to salvage her fledgling campaign
Sorry to be a stickler, but "fledgling" is not the word you want. It means "new, untried, inexperienced".
You mean "flagging", which means to fall off in vigor, energy, activity, interest, etc.
notice how obama is always saying "some say" constantly as if no one knows who he is talking about. "some say" this
"some say" that. Sounds like some spoiled kid telling his mommy that the kids on the block are picking on him.
"some say" Obama is major pussy.
Obama- mommy,mommy,mommy. I'm right here baby boy! says Kennedy
VegasRage @ 35:
She is very diplomatic! I love them both and for separate reasons! I hate how the Clinton's have been torn to shreds by the ignorant and disrespectful! The total left are so apathetic, spoiled, flaky, radical, and disloyal! They are also self centered and display an awful sense of entitlement! I cannot believe I ever defended them! After the way they have treated the Clinton's, I do not want to have anything to do with them! I do not know who I dislike more, the radical left or the radical right! They both suck and cause total division!
Your all just mad because, HE is 100 percent CORRECT!
Too bad losers, no more clintmoronics, THE WORD!
I'm more concerned about how smug she often comes off. She also has little moves she makes that are the same as mothers make when they're disapproving by body movements and expressions instead of by making a clear statement. But then, when you listen to what she says right after that, it's contrary to what the preceding body language meant.
Now, as Democrats, some of us may find this OK, because we know what she was thinking, as she signaled it, and then we re-interpret her diplomatic version of it as merely the way it has to be said in order for people to more widely understand and find it acceptable.
However, this model of communication is more similar to Dubya's, and both are far less clear and as far off task as Obama's method of communication, which is relatively direct.
No Blood for Hubris @ 36:
I would have to agree with your comment, but I want to take it a step further. Let me first say that I support both candidates and will back whoever takes the nomination. Now, if I were a woman, I would be at the very least somewhat disappointed in the way women have been portrayed by the media in this election. The main examples that immediately come to mind are: Hillary becoming emotional/showing a softer side and therefore women in New Hampshire ran to her side to protect her - so only women have an uncontrollable emotional over rational mind? Or how about Michelle Barack making the mis-worded comment regarding her pride for this country - I do not doubt her pride, but when pundits on MSNBC make the argument that she made this remark out of exhaustion stemmed from excessive traveling it makes women appear weak and unable to pull their own. I make this last comment as when Pres. Clinton made some controversial remarks, he was seen as being out of line not because he was tired - why wasn't the same argument adopted as was for Michelle? The last comment that I will refer to, although many do not see it as misogynistic, is the pimping argument - Could you imagine if the media had said that Barack was pimping his two daughters? - the Black community would have destroyed MSNBC and they have a reason too. As a supporter of women's equality and both of these candidates - as I said earlier no matter who wins the nomination, I will support both equally - I find it amazing that more women are not as pissed as I am. What is the line where you say enough is enough?
"Fledgling"? I think you meant "foundering". There's this thing called a dictionary, you might try it sometime.
Seriously @ 42:
Oh, bullshit. She is trying to seat the MI and FL delegates, trying to persuade the pledged delegates, one of her surogates said Obama supporters are "Latte drinking, Birkenstock wearing, prius driving hippies." You cannot claim that she is diplomatic and then have her campaign pull these kind of stunts.
I THINK THE BRILLIANT HILLARY HAS ALREADY EXPLAINED VERY WELL HER PLANS FOR THE FUTURE OF U.S.A IF SHE IS ELECTED FOR PRESIDENT...WHY IS SHE STARTING TO LOSE?
IS BECAUSE OF THE .....MEDIA....IS TAKING OBAMA" UNDER THEIR WING"AND PROTECT HIM.
AND TALK ROUGHLY ABOUT THE BRILLIANT HILLARY FOR NO REASON...
OR MAYBE JUST BECAUSE SHE'S A WOMEN...
WHERE ARE ALL OF CLINTON'S FRIENDS??? ARE THEY GOING WITH THE FLOW FOR OBAMA???
I KNOW SHE IS GOING TO BE THE "COME BACK KID" WITH THE HELP OFF PENNSYLVANIA,OHIO,
AND TEXAS ,...WAKE UP AMERICA...DO YOU WANT AMERICAN TROOPS IN KENYA??
ASK YOURSELVES..WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT OBAMA...REALLY KNOW,BESIDES WHAT HE TELL YOU...AND YOU WILL SEE THAT WE REALLY KNOW ALMOST NOTHING...SCARE VERY SCARE
gkruz @ 46:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fledgling
Also, I think you meant to say 'floundering,' not "foundering."
The "b" word is a generic term that defines someone's deficiencies as part of their gender, rather than addressing what specifically they have said or done that is bad. It cuts off dialogue; it suggests to women that they'd better behave; and it kind of demeans the user.
Meat @ 49:
No, I meant "foundering". See this link: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/foundering, particularly definitions two and four. Floundering works, but to me it conjures up an image of a fish drowning. (So maybe it works, after all.)
Login or Register to post comments.