For pastors to endorse McCain is kind of hilarious because they hate him almost as much as liberals do, but something should be done about this.

Defying a federal law that prohibits U.S. clergy from endorsing political candidates from the pulpit, an evangelical Christian minister told his congregation Sunday that voting for Sen. Barack Obama would be evidence of "severe moral schizophrenia."  Johnson and 32 other pastors across the country set out Sunday to break the rules, hoping to generate a legal battle that will prompt federal courts to throw out a 54-year-old ban on political endorsements by tax-exempt houses of worship.

The ministers contend they have a constitutional right to advise their worshipers how to vote. As Johnson put it during a break between sermons, "The point that the IRS says you can't do it, I'm saying you're wrong."

They want this to be an issue. Just remove their tax free status (preceded by a lengthy, expensive audit) and be done with it for all those that break the law.  

More at Project Fairplay, which specifically targets these abuses by churches and pastors. 

Related Reactions



Login or Register to post comments.

169 comments

33 pastors. One for each year of Jesus' life.
Tax them for the money pits that they are.

I boldly predict that exactly ZERO churches will be investigated/audited for this, until an Obama presidency at least.

H'mm....The Christian religion that I believe in doesn't condone lying and adultery.

baby jesus just wants a smart guy this time

severe moral schizophrenia

LO-fucking-L

Let's be fair: they didn't actually NAME McCain; they just told people not to vote for Obama. I love the part in the Post story where a pastor says he's making his views very clear because he's not sure parishioners can figure it out for themselves.

Ban religion.

Superstitious bullshit.

Jesus said to go in secret to worship.

Start now!

Jesus loves war for profit, says so right there in the KJV.

slightly O/T: Something I haven't seen mentioned is that a Vice President Palin would mean that President McCain is utterly absolutely unimpeachable, no matter what.

Christianity is not a religion anyway, it's a political party.

What's absolutely maddening is that media slime on CNN keep reporting this story and conveniently leaving out the point that it's Republican church freaks. CNN keeps presenting reports carefully crafted to make it seem like a mystery "hmmmm .... these mysterious pastors want to practice freedom of speech." .... no mention whatsoever that they are 100% dishonest McCain shill preachers.

Red Headed StepChild @ 9:

Christianity is not a religion anyway, it's a political party.

Anda business.

Maybe it's about time that God smited these reprobates. These slimebags are arrogant and repulsive---a turd in the punchbowl of spirituality.

Pay taxes Christian Freak Show and you can talk all you want.

Make me King for a year. Ill put cameras in every tax exempt house of worship. One mention of politics and its bye bye tax breaks. Second time ? Ill just knock the buildings down with a bulldozer or blow them up. After i seize their bank accounts and liquid assets of course.

i guess that means they just lost their tax free status.

Tax their church's property.

No tax deductions for their congregation.

Put a tax on their mouths.

Whoops, is that going too far?

All ideologies -- religious, economic, political -- require passivity on the part of their adherents. At base, they are fearful of and have only contempt for democracy as the sole legitimacy of all power is the individual citizen who is charged with the responsibility for DISINTERESTED PARTICIPATION in the pursuit of the COMMON GOOD/COMMON WEAL/COMMONWEALTH. Religionists of all stripes are a threat this 2500 year-old tradition in the western world. Democracy's poster boy is Socrates not Pope Benedict, Jerry Falwell, Reverend (?) Billy Graham or any one of the other hatefilled anti-humanists that have been responsible for so much fear, pain and suffering. Shred them all.

Jackasses are real brave until the IRS sends their notice. Then they will cry and scream all kinds of constitutional violations. Well, if the evangelicals want to pay taxes have a rally for McCain. But I bet they don't.

Damned right , pull their tax exempt status , hit em in the pocket book , that's the most important thing to these frauds . I agree #9 , these aren't Christians but an arm of the Repug party , plain and simple .

baby jesus @ 4:

baby jesus just wants a smart guy this time

We have one this time so join with us lit'l dude.

Money is the great divider on just how christian you really are. Pay the taxes then scream McCain. You don't want to pay-SHUT UP!!!!!!

Act first, ask questions later. If someone would send the IRS some proof, say a videotape, of these pastors in action the IRS could cut off their tax exemption on the spot. It would be up to the church(es) to prove they should get it back.

A heft bill from Uncle Sugar might make them see the light or in their case "come to Jesus".

"Tax the churches.

Tax the businesses that the churches own."

~The Grand Wazoo

No fuss no muss.

If they were endorsing Obama something would be done about it ...

Tax the fuckers, they want to take a ride in the government? They have to pay like everyone else.

We should set up protests and troll them with signs that say "Abortion brings babies to god faster", "Have Gay sex for Jesus"

Damn straight they have a constitutional right to free speech.
Of course, there's nothing in the constitution granting them freedom from taxation..

These guys are screwing themselves royally. Perhaps not in the court of public opinion but certainly in any real world court.

from 501(c)(3)

"no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation (except as otherwise provided in subsection (h)), and which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office. "

Is that so hard to understand?

They are right they have freedom of speech and they can endorse whomsoever these please. It's just that if they choose this course they don't get a free ride on tax.

Do unto others what they would do unto you. Throw the book at them. Audit them. Make these assholes pay.
Didn't Bushco hassle some churches who somehow advocated voting for Kerry?

It only leads down to one fact: religion is the opiate of the masses. And the Republicans use this fact in order to make sure that their ideology stays cemented in the brains of the parishioners. It seems that these Americans only in name forgot about the separation between Church and State.

And I agree that these Churches should be taxed if they are willing to be in violation so flagrantly.

IRS doesn't say they can't endorse. The IRS says they can't endorse and still enjoy the benefits of a 501-c-3 non-profit tax exemption. Tax 'em.

wombab @ 27:

They are right they have freedom of speech and they can endorse whomsoever these please. It's just that if they choose this course they don't get a free ride on tax.

Tell that to the "church" of scientology.

Infinite tax-free status for ages under a secret deal with the IRS.

Or to put it another way.. their thinking is simply backwards: They take their Tax Exemption for granted, and now they claim their right to Free Speech.
But it's the latter which is guaranteed by law, not the former.

Religious principles are constantly undermining the intelligence of people all around the world. Do these pastors think people are that stupid to not see what they are doing here? Their golden money egg might disappear (please, let it be so) and they're panicking. Panicking, I tell you. I love it, the more they squirm their oily beliefs onto the public, eventually they'll work themselves to extinction. Sweet. There's no need for any religion on this planet.

I recall the Bush administration harassing some puny church for having a peace sign on their property, threatening loss of tax status, etc. I think the pastors are right about one thing: the Republicans will support them, and the cowardly Democrats will be afraid to oppose them. There will be no consequences for their breaking the law.

The Very Bitter Ceci Hussein @ 33:

OMG. Please SM, remove my double post. I am very sorry for that happening. :(

How embarrassing. ;^)

According to the new definition, an unlawful act intended to alter or influence policy is an act of terrorism.

THanks for the heads up. Just donated to Americans United for Sep of Church & State (AGAIN!)

i can imagine that these pastors
are on bended knee praying to
their god-of-choice asking for
forgiveness for fucking over their congregation.

The preachers are right. They do have a right to endorse candidates from the pulpit. They just lose their tax-exempt status if they do. Why the clergy would want to over turn a law that gives them tax-exempt status is beyond my ability to comprehend; yet, it is not surprising coming from morons that believe in unicorns.

i don't care if he gets an endorsement from the pope himself.

there's nothing that's going to keep johnny maverick's straight jacket express from going over the cliff and into the dustbin of history.

What a bunch of dim-bulbs. They're not going to get thrown in jail for their martyr photo-ops. They'll just lose their tax-exempt status. Althought, that's probably a GOOD thing! Some of those TEE VEE evangelists are raking in a FORTUNE. Blackmailing people into emptying their pockets into the church with a threat of eternal damnation is a time-honored tradition that goes back to the middle ages. But at least in the middle ages, the government had the common sense to take their cut, one way or the other.

And by the way, what do they mean by 32 pastors from "across the country?" Do they mean all the way from Florida to North Carolina?

Capatain Bitter Elitist Kangaroo @ 35:

The Very Bitter Ceci Hussein @ 33:

OMG. Please SM, remove my double post. I am very sorry for that happening. :(

How embarrassing. ;^)

;-D

Well, I know how annoying double posts can be sometimes if it is the same thing repetitiously. :(

I'm just glad that it was promptly taken care of and that the SM got my message. :)

So they think Obama makes the baby jesus cry?

McCain/Palin makes the baby eagle cry.

Nothing is going to happen to the maniacal religious right. They get a bye.

God help the Episcopal priest or UU minister who has an Obama sticker on his car.

Col Kilgore @ 14:

Make me King for a year. Ill put cameras in every tax exempt house of worship. One mention of politics and its bye bye tax breaks. Second time ? Ill just knock the buildings down with a bulldozer or blow them up. After i seize their bank accounts and liquid assets of course.

Okay, you're King!

Can I drive the bulldozer?

baby jesus @ 4:

baby jesus just wants a smart guy this time

Thank you baby jesus. So do I.

What a trend we have in Jeeezuss

I see two possible outcomes to the (inevitable) audits and lawsuits:

1) The pastors lose their case, and the churches lose their tax-exempt status

or

2) The pastors win their case, and the courts decide it's okay for churches to enter politics and remain tax exempt. Six months later, every 527 and political group now claims it to be "The Church of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" (or whatever), so that it too can be tax-exempt. One year after that, the entire concept of "tax exemption for churches" is thrown out as unworkable, because how do you determine who is or is not a church, anymore?

I have Always been against this idea that Churches not have to pay taxes. It's ridiculous. They are for the most part Snake-Oil Salesmen and that Snake Oil should be a taxable commodity.

Let them scream it from the tops of their pulpits - just after they pay their taxes!

Once these fly by night schiesters get hit in the money belt, they will STFU.

Jim @ 3:

H'mm....The Christian religion that I believe in doesn't condone lying and adultery.

amen

baby jesus also asks that the next president pronounce nuclear correctly

Defying a federal law that prohibits U.S. clergy from endorsing political candidates from the pulpit

NO. This is not the way to describe it, WaPo.

Clergy can endorse from the pulpit; they merely cannot take taxbreaks to do it. Remember that important distinction when arguing with people

So the Bush Administration will enforce the law here, right?

I guess they've been at it again, ripping passages out their bibles so it conforms to their own ideologies their pulpits can continue to give them a place of power and control through their use of fear:

Romans 13

1. Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.

Tax the bastards. Heck, that alone would bail out Wall St. and then some.

Actually what ministers and other clergy across the country should be doing is emulating the example of Fathers Philip and Daniel Berrigan, who had the courage and moral certitude to protest the presence of the United States in Vietnam, by speaking out against the illegal and immoral occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq and urging both McCain and Obama to call for the immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces from those two countries. That is certainly what good Christians should be doing, which is urging their leaders to speak out against these illegal occupations. The clergy today would also do well to remember the words of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who reminded the country in his Beyond Vietnam speech that "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own government."

Why the F U*K should churches be Tax Free when they are FOR PROFIT? TOTAL BS!

make your own couric interview with the palin interview answer generator!

http://interviewpalin.com/

here’s a sample (warning, this has the appearance of actually being a true palin answer but it is indeed fiction, which unfortunately cannot be said of the couric interviews):

Q: What is the role of the US in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Afghanistan will lead to further security of our nation, especially with homeowners. It’s just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that this happens. We’ve got to remember what the desire is in their country, also. And I asked President Karzai, “Is that what President Bush has attempted to do things better. But it is to control much more than a heck of a lot of background work first and shoring up allies and positions and figuring out what sanctions perhaps could be more comfortable and certainly safer. First off, we’re going to continue good relations with Saakashvili there.

Wait a second, the same is true from Obama's church.

pray for a secular nation.

Say what you want and pay taxes
end of story

This stupid stunt may have worked 4 or 8 yrs ago, but not now. I’m sure the IRS is in dire need of some extra cash so who better to tap than the conservative ideologists who got us where we are today.

As Rachel said on her stream a moment ago.

"If you Crow about something because you think it's going to happen and it doesn't happen, Your Gonna Eat Crow."

It's extremely shortsighted on their part. If endorsing a candidate from the pulpit is legitimized - regardless of tax implications - it means everyone gets to do so. The rabbi down the street, the imam at the mosque a few blocks over, even the Wiccan high priest/priestess (not that many of the latter have an actual church and/or 501c3 status).

Furthermore, it cheapens the pulpit and the preacher both - the pulpit is a place from which a message of inspiration should come, not directives on how to vote. It shows a fundamental lack of faith in one's congregation, that - without the preacher's electoral guidance - the flock is easily corrupted, led astray, and just plain stupid. So nice that you hold us in such high esteem, pastor.

Lastly, it goes against the very teachings of Christ, who railed against the temple square becoming a marketplace, and who urged us to render unto Caesar what was Caesar's. I'd even go so far to say that the Commandment to keep holy the Sabbath could be construed as not sullying the pulpit with earthly politics.

My church was investigated after Hillary spoke. complaints will be filed against each church.

McPale's Navy @ 55:

I guess they've been at it again, ripping passages out their bibles so it conforms to their own ideologies their pulpits can continue to give them a place of power and control through their use of fear:

Romans 13

1. Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.

Right. That passage has been used before as a defense for obedience to the state. There was even some program that had ministers selected to preach such in the event of a 'national disaster' (i.e. another turrurrist attack on 'murica) - never mind Blackwater roaming the streets, or the KBR relocation camps - it's all God's Work.

McPale's Navy @ 55:

I guess they've been at it again, ripping passages out their bibles so it conforms to their own ideologies their pulpits can continue to give them a place of power and control through their use of fear:

Romans 13

1. Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.

Tax the bastards. Heck, that alone would bail out Wall St. and then some.

Render unto Ceasar what is Cesar's and unto God what is God's.

You all have missed the fundamental point. Currently in the United States only half of the religion part of the First Amendment is enforced. The exercise clause is enforced but the establishment clause is not. Tax exemptions for churches are a clear violation of the establishment clause, since they put the government in the position of deciding who is a legitimate religion and who is not.

Enforce the establishment clause, tax churches, problem solved.

In case anyone was interested... here are the documents outlining some of these "new rules"...

http://www.iowachristian.com/socialimpact/Constitutional%20Protections%2...

http://www.iowachristian.com/voterguides/pastors_churches_and_politics.pdf

These documents were distributed to churches that are involved in certain networks-- they were also distributed through many conservative christian (republican) front groups.

i wonder if rev wright or father phlager have ever endorsed obama from the pulpit - im certain the outrage would be just as immediate by the folks on this comment page...please

Absolutely.. these churches should lose their tax status first and fight the law to regain that status. It's real easy to see Dubya and his lackeys were hard at work creating a federal judicary that would pave the way for this.

I go to Church every week, but not one of these fraud churches. I go to worship God not some loud-mouthed preacher. Church is about God and the preacher's job is supposed to be about leading people to God. When they fail that task they should find another line of work. But probably they would not make as much money. I find it hard to believe how brain-dead these people are that they sit there and let these clowns get away with this crap. This nonsense is not the will of God, no matter what the preacher says.

Shadowgm @ 64:

It's extremely shortsighted on their part. If endorsing a candidate from the pulpit is legitimized - regardless of tax implications - it means everyone gets to do so. The rabbi down the street, the imam at the mosque a few blocks over, even the Wiccan high priest/priestess (not that many of the latter have an actual church and/or 501c3 status).

Furthermore, it cheapens the pulpit and the preacher both - the pulpit is a place from which a message of inspiration should come, not directives on how to vote. It shows a fundamental lack of faith in one's congregation, that - without the preacher's electoral guidance - the flock is easily corrupted, led astray, and just plain stupid. So nice that you hold us in such high esteem, pastor.

Lastly, it goes against the very teachings of Christ, who railed against the temple square becoming a marketplace, and who urged us to render unto Caesar what was Caesar's. I'd even go so far to say that the Commandment to keep holy the Sabbath could be construed as not sullying the pulpit with earthly politics.

Pre-scientific (Copernicus, Galileo, Darwin, Crick and Watson) religionists are not rational nor non-rational. They are irrational and the only way to deal with irrationality that is a serious threat to some entity (individual, community, country) is to destroy it. Altruism/indifference/tolerance/wishful thinking won't work. Lots of examples but the biggee is the corporatist, fascist National Socialist Party. If need be, they must be taken out by appropriate legislation. If that doesn't work, parody and satire can be quite effective.

Well if they dont pay the tax bill which shouldbe sent within the week, then clap the charlatans in irons, and take them to the brig. They can pray while waiting for appeal..about ten years from now.

The religionists do have the right to endorse whoever they want.

But doing it while being free from taxation means that I, as a taxpayer, am subsidizing this. Tax them. If they fail to pay, seel their temples of hate as condos.

Why are churches tax-exempt anyway? Isn't tithe just a form of taxation? My American Heritage Dictionary seems to think it is. I'll throw my lot in with George Carlin and Frank Zappa before Jerry Falwell and Anal Roberts thank you very much.

Breaking the law is so natural for republicans that they just do it without thinking.

Desperate sanctimonious assholes know their gravy train is about to crash.

They had one of the pastors on the CBC. His rational was that he was voting for McCain as he was the anti-abortion candidate.

Interesting given that McCain willingly took part in bombing innocent civilians in a country that in no way posed a threat to the U.S.

But I guess this is the typical Republican's love of life yet to be born and disregard for those already here.

They're unwilling to put their money where their mouthes are. Money Talks, BS Walks.

Tax them. They need the money after w's bailout and Iraq.

"The effort by the Arizona-based legal consortium is designed to trigger an IRS investigation that ADF lawyers would then challenge in federal court. The ultimate goal is to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court to throw out a 54-year-old ban on political endorsements by tax-exempt houses of worship." -Washington Post
All the more reason to vote for Obama. Keep the right-wing from packing the courts.

trey @ 70:

i wonder if rev wright or father phlager have ever endorsed obama from the pulpit - im certain the outrage would be just as immediate by the folks on this comment page...please

Wright did endorse Obama and is being investigated over it:

http://jonathanturley.org/2008/03/14/rev-jeremiah-wrights-church-may-hav...

But you won't see anybody here standing up for Wright. The reason why is, it's against the law. Full stop.

The point of this article is that there is a concerted effort by the right-wing evangelicals to evade and forcibly overturn the law. This should concern anybody, but obviously, you're more interested in tit-for-tat.

Nobody wants organized religion to be given the power to control our right to choose our leaders, and eventually control our laws. That would be disastrous.

an evangelical Christian minister told his congregation Sunday that voting for Sen. Barack Obama would be evidence of “severe moral schizophrenia.”

How very "Christian" of him.

UbuRoi @ 79:

They had one of the pastors on the CBC. His rational was that he was voting for McCain as he was the anti-abortion candidate. Interesting given that McCain willingly took part in bombing innocent civilians in a country that in no way posed a threat to the U.S. But I guess this is the typical Republican's love of life yet to be born and disregard for those already here.

The irony is, most people are voting against the things that would help them (and hold most closely to their beliefs).

But this is the way the Republicans have always gotten votes: By dividing people along cultural lines: pro-choice and pro-life, pro raising taxes and pro cutting taxes, patriots and non-patriots, blacks and whites. It's easy to win doing that.

Then in office, they institute policies that will gut public institutions, bolster corporations and pull the safety nets from under average people. That's what they've done, and it's worked, so that's what they'll continue to do.

Ultimately--and they've publicly stated this--they want government to be so small that "you can drown it in a bathtub." What better way to achieve this goal than to put the taxpayer into extreme debt and a precarious economic situation? That way, drastic cuts MUST be made to "government" programs, like Social Security, Medicare, public schools, public assistance programs, etc., etc.

(If you don't believe me, look at their platforms: http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/
You'll certainly find "Reform Social Security and Medicare." In typical Republican lingo, the word "reform" is a euphemism for "privatize.")

They want every public school to be a private school, because this will allow "successful" schools to thrive and "bad" schools to fail. The success of the schools would, of course, be based on the profit they turn.

Don't be surprised when these things come to pass. That's why they call it "ideology." It's what they believe.

THEY ARE USING THE CHURCHES AS A TOOL BECAUSE IT'S ALL THEY HAVE.

Endorsing this vile warmonger John McCain is not Christian, it is the devil's endorsement.

This isn't about free speech, but a free ride. It's a pay to play deal. Give up your tax free status and you can endorse who ever the hell you want or use your facilities for political purposes.

This is such an overlooked and vital component of the American political system and "democracy" in general.

Thomas Frank may have done the most articulate job at describing this culture in WTMWK. This is more than just the Evangelical movement pushing it's agenda on the pulpit, it is a larger scale extremist from of Christianity that permeates main stream society but is larger threat to true democratic principles when you get to the bright red areas.

When you factor in how the Bush admin has used this to their advantage and worked towards breaking down the 501 C3 safeguards. Basically turn preachers into lobbyists and watch the money fly.

So you'd have a quasi theocratic-fascist state, the right wings mighty triangulation of power--church, corporations and perverse government.

Yet another reason this election is so important.

Anyone else notice that the only pastors backing this are part of far right dominionist sects?

I get very nervous when these Religious Right churches try to buck the system like this. A lot of folks here are saying yank the tax exempt status from all of religious organizations.

Contrary to what most of the anti-religion crowd that frequents this blog believes, most churches and other religious organizations are NOT rolling in money. The church I pastor barely makes budget every year. And if we lose our tax exempt status, that's it. Who then will feed the poor who use our food pantry? Who then will provide money for those in need when the gas bill falls behind in the middle of winter? Those are ministries of my church, which is situated in a community of 700 in rural America where the average income hovers barely above the poverty line.

There's more to the church (and all religions) than the megachurch with 10,000 affluent members. A significant number of lower income people rely on religious organizations for help in times of need, help that is given freely because it's the right thing to do.

You may not believe in what I preach from my pulpit. That's your freedom. But don't punish me, my parishioners, and the people of my community for the idiocy of these Religious Right fools who seem to think Jesus would have endorsed criminals and warmongers as our secular leaders.

I'd like to hope for removal of their tax exempt status. Will that happen? Not in this F@#ked Up nation. Faith based politicizing. Amen

Anything is possible now that pregnant, unwed teen-aged girls are a Republican value.

debg @ 6:

Let's be fair: they didn't actually NAME McCain; they just told people not to vote for Obama.

Alexdem @ 26:

any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.

It doesn't matter that they didn't say to vote for McCain. If they said to not vote for Obama, then they have violated IRS regulation 501(c)(3) and should be stripped of their tax exempt status.

Time to tax the these pastors along with their knuckle dragging congregants back to the stone age where they can romp around with the dinosaurs.

why do i hate christians evangelicals.......let me count the ways.

faux news has been posing the question to their followers.
"do church's have first amendment rights? why can't they say how to vote?"

expect to see more of this.