I ask again. Is the press going to look into Lieberman’s new ad campaign, you know, the new one: "I was hacked"? Will they actually investigate and get to the facts? Obviously, they will not.
Why the hell is Joe Lieberman’s campaign site hosted by these people (site down — probably not because of dirty deeds, by the way) under the cheapest plan available? And why do Lieberman’s FEC filings say he’s paying $1500 to a different company for web hosting? No, we seriously want to know. These aren’t rhetorical questions...read on
The NY Times owes the Lamont camp one big apology:
(Wordpress doubled the post, but I didn't want to lose your comments)