Read time: 1 minute

Michael Sam Responds To Tony Dungy: Thank God He Wasn't The St. Louis Rams Coach

It was a response that showed that Sam won't be affected by what Dungy or anyone else thinks.

Former NFL coach Tony Dungy said that he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam because of all the media attention the first openly gay player would receive and the distractions it would have caused. I've written about it at length here and here. Michael Sam was asked to respond to those words and answered in a very calm and thoughtful way:

On Tuesday Michael Sam responded to Tony Dungy's comment to the Tampa Bay Tribune that he wouldn't take the openly gay St. Louis Rams rookie in the draft because he would be a "distraction," a comment that Dungy later clarified. Sam said he was just glad that Dungy wasn't the Rams coach.

It was a tempered response from the rookie, who spoke with ESPN's Rams writer Nick Wagoner, but it was a response that showed that Sam won't be affected by what Dungy or anyone else thinks.

Sam also said:

I have a lot of respect for Coach Dungy, And like everyone in America, everyone is entitled to their own opinions.

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage


NOTE: We will be changing to a new commenting platform in the next couple of weeks. We will supply more details as we get closer to the change. We understand some users are having problems with comments loading and this will hopefully remedy that problem

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.