Read time: 2 minutes

Fox News' Brit Hume Debate Analysis: Hillary Clinton 'Not Necessarily Attractive'

Did you know we were watching a beauty pageant last night instead of a presidential debate?

I always take a tour around the media immediately after a major speech or debate. Last night, when I flipped to Fox News, there was one stand-out performance by a pundit.

Out of dozens of reporters, Brit Hume came off as the most misogynistic douche of the night.

During the ninety-minute presidential debate, Donald Trump sniffed and snorted, made peevish faces and odd noises, and smirked throughout while Hillary Clinton spoke.

Megyn Kelly asked for Hume's opinion and Brit admitted Trump fell into traps on the "Birther issue" and on his "tax returns."

Optics are always part of a national debate and Brit Hume rightly engaged on this issue when he said, “What did they think of the two faces that they saw while the two candidates were not talking, when they were listening?”

He continued, "The Trump expression is one we’re all familiar with from the earlier debates. He looked annoyed, put out, uncomfortable.”

But Hume had to try and even the score somewhat for Trump supporters, so he went the misogynistic double-standard "looks" route: "[Hillary] looked composed, smug sometimes, not necessarily attractive.

He continued. “I think a lot will turn on how people reacted to the faces they saw on the screen side by side tonight. We’ll have to wait to find out how that turns out."

Hillary Clinton looked like Hillary Clinton has always looked during this campaign.

Last night she looked dignified and poised during the entire debate, but that wasn't the case for Trump, who got rattled early and often. To comment on her "attractiveness" is something Donald Trump would say while he watched one of his beauty pageants.

I tweeted this as soon as I saw it last night.

Outside of Trump's facial expressions, was he pretty or not necessarily attractive? Maybe he should have smiled more!

Brit Hume's opinions were revolting.

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage


New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team