Personally, I would have gone with a harsher word than "irony" for a GOP who passes tax cuts for the rich that adds trillions to the deficit acting like they care about the cost of Biden's programs, but Jen Psaki is more polite.
December 4, 2021

Who knows what was going through Peter Doocy's alleged mind when he asked Jen Psaki the following deeply dishonest question:

"Lindsey Graham said that he has heard from the CBO that they're gonna do an alternative cost estimate, and that it's gonna cost more and add more to the debt," he began. I'm not sure what the "it" is, probably the Continuing Resolution that just passed, but honestly, it doesn't even matter for these purposes. "So is there any thought around here to maybe waiting for Build Back Better until a month that you don't have this big miss in the jobs report?"

So nasty. So mansplainy. So condescending. As if

  1. the jobs report was actually a big miss,

    and

  2. she'd fall to her knees in gratitude for that brilliant suggestion on how the Biden administration should govern!

As always, Psaki was ready.

"There's a lot of things gathered into that question. Let me do the best I can for you, here. In terms of the report of a new CBO, that is not exactly how it works," she said.

Uh, oh. You mean, she knows better than he does how government works? I'm SHOCKED.

She then smacked him with this little nugget: "There has been, and let me just start with the irony, here, that there's an irony that a number of Republicans who forced an unpopular tax giveaway to the rich that increased our debt by two trillion dollars, and certainly didn't ask for a score in a continuation of that legislation that did add to the deficit, are now asking for a score, an additional score, post this bill being concluded for something that isn't even going to be law. They're asking about a potential continuation of these components of the package, and again, that the president has said he would pay for."

Ouch. We all know Doocy's well-versed in hypocrisy, but irony isn't his strong suit.

Then came her laser sharp psychoanalysis, which was just a bonus.

"I can't get into the psyche of why. I would suggest it might be, have something to do with their opposition to raising taxes on corporations. That seems to get under their skin a little bit. We disagree with them on that front," she explained. But she finished with why the CBO isnt exactly the only source for the administration in determining the costs and savings of each fiscal decision.

"I would say the CBO has put out a score, a number of economists have put out scores. We have outlined in the past that CBO does not have a great deal of experience in scoring components like the IRS tax savings. That's something that the former head of the CBO has also spoken to in the past, and that there are estimates about those cost savings that lead to not only our assessments of the costs and savings from the package, but the assessments by many economists."

So maybe, just maybe, Doocy should keep his insulting, ignorant mouth shut.

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. When registering you will also be presented with the option to tie all your old Disqus comments to your new Insticator account. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.