It's Official: Colbert To Enter 2008 Presidential Race! Take the Poll
By SilentPatriot Tuesday Oct 16, 2007 8:51pm
On last night's "Report," Stephen finally answered the prayers of millions of Colbert Nation citizens and announced his decision to run for President of the United States -- but only in his home state of South Carolina...and on both the Republican and Democratic tickets. CBS' Jeff Greenfield then joins Stephen to assess his electoral prospects.
Download | play 
Download | play
President Colbert sure does have a nice ring to it, no? We're trying a new feature out on C&L. I know all the candidates aren't listed, but I'm just testing the software to make sure it works this time---so take the Poll! See more at Indecision 2008 website.
Login or Register to post comments.
Yes. I'm ready to take my chances on anyone who isn't a career politician. Plus I really like Stephen Colbert.
I would so TOTALLY vote for Colbert! I am so SICK of all of the politicians. We can't get a straight answer from anyone. The dems make me sick and the republicans make me sicker.
NONE OF THEM DESERVE to be governing!
Colbert '08!
[Deleted. Don't come here and lay that crap on this site-Sitemonitor]
With Stewart as his running mate...
No, but he can be Kucinich's VP anyday.
I would even switch parties to be able to vote for Colbert in the primary!
NO-Give me KUCINICH!!!
I can't get the damned thing to work....
Chill out Sitemon...it was a joke.
[Sorry hanshiro. I'm a bit tetchy about that. We see so much of it that ISN'T a joke. Maybe next time a subtle 'j/k' could be added. Or a smiley face :) -Sitemonitor]
Yeah, I love Colbert but Kucinich should be an option.
for the 3 % who don't vote.....thanks for nuthin......it's your future...so don't bitch when it all falls down around you.Meanwhile..the draft gets re-enacted...and your kids get shipped off to Iran.
hanshiro @ 9:
:) n/p
where's the larry craig/matt lauer open threads? sorry, thread? Mrs. Craig is a ringer for Barb on "Li'l Bush"
WHY STEPHEN COLBERT SHOULD NOT RUN FOR PRESIDENT!
i don't vote is the correct answer
I'm disappointed in your poll. Didn't you notice that there are more than three Democrats in the race? Some of us, maybe many of us, would like to option of voting for someone other than the anointed front runners.
[...] Stephen Colbert puts the country on notice: [...]
This smacks of Ralph Nader.
Be careful about how you spend your vote.
This is more important than a comedian's attempt to achieve great comedic stature.
YES I WILL VOTE 4 STEVE - IF HE VPTES 4 ME
Have some great tips 4 U from U Know... Me, Yes
I'm Running 4 ( PResident of Planet Earth )
Call me (AnyGLOBALtime) 4 Endorsement... 603 569 1799
Roger Drowne EC
( E.C. = Earth Citizen )
PResident of Planet Earth
See how U can ALSO Run 4...
P.o.P.E.
http://www.PresidentOfPlanetEarth.com
PS... Stevie, Stop by the site... Let's Talk On
C.D Rose Show, Later Next Week
Peace, Love & Later, Roger@RogerART.com
Your, P.o.P.E - 2 B
.
You people do realize that this is A JOKE right?
Yeah why isn't Kucinich on there?
Kucinich/Colbert 08
http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/75235/detail/
Hah. Even if it is a joke I'd laugh if he won the state.
DarthSaikos @ 23:
Then you're an idiot.
I love how everybody falls for jokes, then runs away with them. Why isn't Dennis Kucinich on the ticket. The best candidate, and not even on the survey. Ridiculous.
bklyn @ 15:
If you don't vote, you don't have the right to complain.
Geno in Ptown @ 20:
Pat Paulson was a joke but got votes due to the fact the candidates were so bad...I'd love to see Colbert show up at a winger debate...
I wanted to vote straight Republican but I didn't think there were any.
You left out one important and glaring option....RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!
Wheres Kucinich, sitemonitor...
Disappointed in C&L...
Canuknotusa @ 24:
If you look at the Republican primary, you couldn't be further from the truth. Giuliani, Thompson, or Mitt as viable options? Please.
I live in Michigan, and our Democratic primary is a joke due to greediness at wanting to be first. All of the major Democratic candidates (except for Hillary) for pulled out. Kucinich, who got my vote last time, tried to pull out but didn't file the right paperwork. If anyone has a chance at defeating Hillary, I'll vote for that person, but if not, I may write in Colbert this time and then hold my nose and vote for Hillary in November.
RON PAUL........
Andy @ 27:
You're playing with fire. US Americans aren't able to distinguish between comedic satire and their real duty to cast a real vote. I'd be careful, if I wanted to remove the current crooks and liars from office, about how much confusion to add to the mix.
I picked straight R because it's so absurd that it counts as a Kucinich vote!
Wow, Kucinich is feeling the love. I like his politics, but I can't vote for him, not until he grows up a little.
The poll looks good, sitemonitors. I might start using it on my own.
Where's the Kucinich choice????????
The sick thing is that the Republicans are going to spin this in a bizarre fashion as support for them. It's the same technique they use when you point out Bush's 24% approval and they say "Look at the Democrat Party Congress 11%!". They will say this shows a total disgust with the 'Democrat Party'. Watch these freaks spin it.
hanshiro @ 7:
ME 2 - NO-Give me KUCINICH!!!
[...] 17th, 2007 · No Comments Cross your fingers and Vote for Colbert over at Crooks and Liars, the official website for cooks and liars and their friends, and mess with [...]
I spent longer than I probably should thinking about who I would actually vote for. I admire so much that Kucinich has done and stands for, he has worked hard to get where he is and probably deserves my vote. But then there's Colbert, who I not only find hilarious, but also a genuinly nice, intelligent guy. Yes, at the end of the day I would actually vote for Colbert because it would (hopefully) send a message, a strong message, one that says that SOME people are ready for a president that hasn't whored him/herself out his/her entire life to one day join the big boys club. I think George Washington once said that (I could be wrong) that if someone has to campaign to be president, they do not deserve to be president. I'm ready for someone like Colbert in 2008.
Thank you C&L for this post.
Andy @ 27:
Honestly, so would I. Especially since the theme for this campaign for the republicans is who is the biggest conservative. Colbert's schtick would blow all of them out of the water. He can out 9/11 rudy, out Guantanamo mitt, out crazy old guy McCain. I think the only person who couldn't handle on the republican side would be thompson. I don't think Stephen Colbert could out bore fred thompson.
But, I'd actually pay money to see Colbert at a GOP debate.
Where's the simple "No" option?
OR, I could have just said what hope at #1 said: "Yes. I’m ready to take my chances on anyone who isn’t a career politician. Plus I really like Stephen Colbert."
That nails it to me.
WOW..........that was original; and funny too............
Why everyone thinks this guy is so funny I'll never know.
I want him to tell me that there will be a chicken in every pot, & a pint of Americone Dream™ in every freezer,...
Pawn @ 26:
That is entirely incorrect. Read the first amendment of the US Constitution.
Geno in Ptown @ 20:
Yeah, and the difference is that this "joke" is the only one admitting it.
Actually I will probably vote for Kucinich (or a Green in the general election), but for now, I am with Stephen!
Speaking of people not being able to take a joke...maybe there should be a poll where we can all guess on which "other" Presidential candidate will complain that Colbert is not allowed to have a 2-hour a week forum to air his platform under Equal Time Laws.
I'm guessing it will be Giuliani. He'll act like he's just playing along with the joke, but really, he'll be dead serious, as Colbert is taking precious time away from people paying attention to Rudy's whoring of the memory of 9/11 for ill placed good will.
Canuknotusa @ 33:
Calm down my northern friend. Many of us get the joke and are just playing along, since it is one of the few bright spots in our national darkness.
Pawn @ 26:
This is the kind of polarizing anti-dialogue that empowers the weasels of today.
"You don't like secret prsion camps! Uuuuhhh! Why do you hate America?!"
BTW, what happened when you DO vote, & that vote is superceded by the Supreme Court or undermined by private voting machine companies, jackass?
Wes @ 39:
ME 3 - NO-Give me KUCINICH!!!
Who are you, the corporate media? What kind of poll is that? Did it occur to you that some people might want to vote for Kucinich, or a Green Party candidate (McKinney?), or someone else? At least a "someone else" would be a nice addition to the poll. Gheesh!
Hey, you forgot to include a "Gay Republican" choice in your survey. Given the way things have been going for the Republicans lately and the size of the field of candidates the odds are good...
Tom @ 54:
Which ones to include?
[Deleted. Off topic-Sitemonitor]
At last - someone who is willing to show "The Cross Of Fear" to the "major" candidates, particularly those "republicans".
One state down, 49 to go Mr Colbert ......
Ron Paul would eliminate all government funded health care.
president? no. ambassador to the netherlands? yah!
It's official.
Fat Bastert isn't even going to finish out his term.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/17/hastert-to-announce-retirement-tomor...
hehe
On a day when it has been revealed that our government is torturing tax evaders (Ed Brown), I have to read about something as trivial as this?
Chris from Ohio @ 61:
Yes and eat up all your carrots too!
xoites defends Constitution @ 52:
NO- Give me KUCINICH!!!
The only way he'll win, though, is if he starts pronouncing his name COL-bert. Col-BEAR is far too French.
nonny mouse @ 64:
I have a sneaking suspicion that he is atempting to utterly confuse and annoy the Republicans in North Carolina (the only state in which he is running.)
Did the totals show Hillary with fewer votes compared to Edwards but polled higher?
I'll look back. Cause at the top of Hillary's total was a higher figure.
I like them both, but this is what makes for polls that lead to head scratches.
At the risk of dating myself, I remember Pat Paulson, and Stephen Colbert is no Pat Paulson.
Anything in there preventing multiple votes? I voted four times for Colbert, the counter went up each time (by more than one however) and I didn't get any error messages. Just hit refresh too, didin't even try clearing out the cookies.
xoites defends Constitution @ 58:
...and the Department of Education/ public funding of education.
jane @ 13:
I agree. This is basically a political gossip blog. It sure isn't an activist site. Why not post a thread on the Craig affair. So in honor of Sen. Craig and his decision to serve out the remainder of his term. I submit the following video. A documentary done By the Discovery Channel in the 1980's.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3395321338401208062
Let us know what you think.
LibertyLover @ 67:
I remember Pat Paulson too. His campaign (yes i know it was a joke) had less momentum than a floor safe. You are correct, Colbert is no Paulson. He is interesting.
JohnnyThief @ 51:
Polarization is not the idea, it's to get people out to vote. Without the necessary votes, we are all stuck with the status quo. If the fearmongers have scared you out of voting, then we're not doing enough to take the power away from those that are stealing votes. What is not voting going to do, empower those that have successfully dumbed down the population to believe what they're told with no questions. Let me ask you what you're doing if your not voting to make a difference, or in addition to voting.
If you question current affairs, apparrently you do, you will vote and fight hard to make sure that your vote counts. Don't vote simply so the other guy loses. Vote for who you believe will do the best job. Thanks for calling me a donkey, I love to kick behind me. Hee Haw. Look out. That's polarizing.
The real Stephen Colbert, sans Colbert Report, is actually a nice and smart guy. So of course I'd vote for him! He really is sincere!
The debates suddenly seem a lot more interesting. Every time the candidates utter a stupidity, pander to voters or beat a cliche into the ground, Colbert will be right there, mocking them into a corner. The subversiveness is delicious.
Geno in Ptown @ 20:
I never would have guessed. Thank you SOOO much for explaining that to us. ;)
xoites defends Constitution @ 71:
Maybe you think that he was boring, but Pat was the perpetual candidate... and I loved his dry sense of humor...and he ran over and over again... Colbert is funny, and yes, I know that that's a joke as well... maybe I'm just nostalgic.
Pawn @ 72:
You have a right to criticize people for not voting. You do not have the right to tell them if they do not vote they may not complain. Bush has done enough damage to the Constitution. Please do not pile on.
Pat Paulson for President 1968... tackles all the tough issues...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMoqFxhoJG8
Geno in Ptown @ 20:
Apparently back in 2000 (and 2004, fool us twice, shame on blarhuarghg!) , folks didn't get that memo about a certain fake cowboy.
Guys, why isn't Kucinich here? Once again, though, Edwards wins over both Obama and Clinton. What's with the pundits? Could it be they want hillary to win? hmmmm
groucho @ 80:
Ya think?
I voted yes, and I wasn't kidding.
I'd rather have an admitted comedian as president than all the inadvertent ones we've had during my lifetime.
Especially the organ grinder's monkey that currently is fiddling with the nuclear football.
Ah wouldn't Cobert be running as a Republican? I've watched his show many times and he sure seems to lean toward the right if you ask me.... ;)
xoites defends Constitution @ 77:
Fair enough, I retract my statement of not having the right to complain. It comes off raw I agree. But fight to keep your right to vote intact with the rest of our rights for those that do vote. To those offended, I apologize. I work hard to make my voice heard on and offline, and grow frustrated with those that don't utilize the tools that are available to them to fight the administration and everything in America they have destroyed.
82 Pawn
Vote!
And if you are serious about changing this mess Vote Kucinich!
Stephen will restore honor back to the White House following the cokehead's defiling of the office
xoites defends Constitution @ 85:
I'm with you, see Pawn 24
KUCINICH/COLBERT
I voted YES, 9 times!
I like Colbert but this will end up hurting serious candidates who are already struggling to earn a nomination like Ron Paul. Essentially, he is this election cycle's Ralph Nater.
"I'm voting straight Republican"???? Is this a joke? I mean, straight Republican?
Site Monitor: Yes, it was a joke.
Kucinich is the ONLY candidate who has stated that he will ARREST bush, et. al., mirandize him and charge their criminal @sses when he's elected. That'd be enough for me!
Pawn @ 26:
Actually, you have every right to complain because if you DO vote and you elect worthless, corrupt, spineless, weak or otherwise useless politicians, then YOU are directly responsible whereas I am merely a victim of your incompetence.
If voting mattered, they wouldn't let us do it- Canadian Proverb
"No Give Me Hillary"- 63%. ???
We are f*cked.
I voted Colbert, but if Colbert was man enough to put Kucinich on the poll, I would vote for Kucinich. I know its a joke, but seriously I think Colbert would be better choice than the top 3 media favorite choices.
mudshark @ 11:
For the 97% who do vote... thanks for nuthin.... it's your future... so if you think electing some figurehead to office every 2-4 years is going to solve anything.... Meanwhile corporate industry continues to take over the entire process and commodify your life down to the water you drink and the air you breathe. But of course, you voted so you sure tried. That's swell.
However, I have to admit Colbert as a candidate is a tempting proposition...
When Colbert stood up to the MSM press whores, the Bush criminals and the rest of useless Washington, he won my vote.
Considering what would happen if Colbert actually won the State of South Carolina, I'm all for it.
Lyon @ 93:
If voting mattered, they wouldn't let us do it- Canadian Proverb
Actually, that's a paraphrase of Emma Goldman's "If voting changed anything, it would be illegal too."
I hate when quotes are misatributed, especially when the person behind the quote is as interesting as Ms. Goldman.
Roger Drowne EC @ 19:
what?
Is it ironic that people that don't vote would vote for the don't vote option?
ps I didn't vote --- no Kucinich option.
Johnny2Bad @ 94:
You misread the results. The highest percentage is for a "Yes" vote for Colbert.
For me, it is either Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul.
Since Kucinich was the only one in the House NOT to reaffirm the bullshit 911 story, and since he has had the courage to go to Lebanon to be a messenger of HOPE for the victims of wars of aggression, and since he will help the 50 million Americans with no healthcare by giving us all healthcare, I will be voting for him.
at the press dinner, Colbert offered to be Press Secretary. I would love to see that.
he'd make a lousy president. 2009 will be the year we can *maybe* re-establish our global reputation. we already have a trash talking tongue in cheek guy who smirks while being divisive and petty. why elect another one just because he's funnier and cooler at being divisive and petty?
The War on Terror is a fraud, and so are the corporate, War on Terror sock puppet candidates, like Clinton and Giuliani.
Cheney is running a terror drill right now and there is a chance he will destroy an American city in an effort to stop elections.
Kucinich and Paul are backed by real Americans.
Did anyone else see the Department of Defense interrupt Ron Paul on CSPAN today when a caller asked him about removing our troops from 140 foreign nations? http://www.nationalexpositor.com/News/524.html
[Off topic-Sitemonitor]
How about NO -- I'm voting for Kucinich? Why is Kucinich always left out of polls, even silly online polls?
Colbert is an attention hog... I wouldn't vote for him for anything. I'd vote for Jon Stewart instead any day.
i'm off-topic by stating that i would vote for ron paul? isn't the topic basically along the lines of "who would you vote for?". i understand it's more about whether or not i would vote for colbert (who i love dearly), but i do see other candidates as options as well as comments by people stating they'd vote kucinich. really don't think the censorship is necessary, sitemonitor (if that is your real name).
xoites defends Constitution @ 55:
I think that "straight republican" choice covers it since all the gay repubs claim to be straight. Sorry log cabin repubs, your party's base will never knowingly elect you.
I look forward to the Goldwater-Colbert debates.
After the debates I will endorse the winer, or the one with the most formidable cleavage!!
hanshiro @ 7:
That's what I would have voted had it been an option in the poll. If C&L is just testing software, why not a poll between Kucinich, Gavel, and Biden?
If I wanted a poll of the Corporate 3, I would go to the LATimes website where they had an almost Identical poll the other day.
Stephen Colbert's presidential bid was done through the guise of his character, and not the actual PERSON Stephen Colbert. Watch this, everybody: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5550134133036374310&q=colbert&hl=en
LEARN.
If I have been mistaken, then this is a horrific case of life imitating art, in which case Colbert the person would have gotten so caught up with his art (techne: his craft) of satirizing other (so it seems) 'characters' of public office and public discourse who pride themselves and their authority on ego establishment and "truthiness" - truth from the gut. Unfortunately, these elements combine in American society and, in their combination, form the unlikely yet true case of establishment of power. It is possible that he himself got caught up in the image of the ego and the groundless discourse he found ways to so cleverly mock before; I do not foresee this happening. But if Colbert doesn't let this evolve into a hilarious punchline, commenting on how ready the American public is to recognize a televised/entertaining character (Reagan, especially; Bush II too) as something we want making serious decisions in the name of the country, then I'll be disillusioned with human nature. This is an uncomfortable move by Stephen Colbert, and I understand neither anyone on this site, nor on others, who take Colbert's "presidential run" seriously and with enthusiasm.
I'd vote for Steve over the choices I was Given. But where's Dennis Kucinich!!
It is interesting that Edwards polled so well ahead of Hillary and Obama. I know rhis mwans nothing but that is really what is happening in the REAL world-where reality is somewhat skewed.
There's no PollDaddy line for voting "Gay Republican"....
Andy @ 27:
Not only that, but Hubert Humphrey (a real progressive) always contended that Paulson cost him the election. We got Nixon in a very close election. Who but liberals would vote for Colbert?
Bertrand Russell @ 112:
I can understand your concerns, especially with the examples you mentioned. But as someone who is familiar with Mr. Colbert's non-character on air persona ( google some vid of him being interviewed for examples ) I would encourage you to relax. He's a comedian, not the serious actor Mr. Regan or Mr. Thompson were. And if, by some odd chance, he was elected president AND didn't decline the honor I could think of few other public figures who would be more dedicated to restoring this country's greatness.
That said, I'll probably vote for the same write-in candidate I voted for in 1992. The MTV candidate...Dennis Leary. That ( self censored expletive ) would get our "poop in a group" with a quickness. Trust.
[Deleted-Sitemonitor]
[...] your fingers and Vote for Colbert over at Crooks and Liars, the official website for cooks and liars and their friends, and mess with [...]
Heretic @ 63:
ME 4 - NO- Give me KUCINICH!!!
ME 5 - America NEEDS Kucinich!!!
I'll be voting for Colbert, but in this poll ....
'Pundit of the Year!'
http://punditfight.blogspot.com/2007/10/vote-for-pundit-of-year.html
sheeple @ 118:
Oh, lighten up. No one likes a curmudgeon. Colbert is certainly better than Romney and Ghouliani. Humour keeps one sane, and gawd knows we need it!!!
REpublican? DEmocrat? I don't care!! Give me Colbert, Give me Colbert NoW!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Canuknotusa @ 33:
If, as you say, Americans are that f--king stupid, this joke is the very least of your problems.
If he's good enough for Aragorn, he's good enough for me!
You also know that you have no choice to just say no to colbert, right? Are we now doing polls like the republicans do to "skew" the results? SilentPatriot I would have expected more from you.
I won't be wasting my vote on colbert, funny sure, but so is bush when you think about it. Freakin' hilarious...
Since Colbert is concentrating on South Csrolina, he had better re-connect with his "black friend".
homer www.altara.blogspot.com
Am I the ONLY person who thinks it's completely embarrassing that so many of us "thinking" Blues would vote for a comedian with no qualifications other than that he has great writers? Gosh, give me someone of substance--even if they are a politician--any day over someone who makes snarky jokes and makes me laugh at evil politicians. It's as bad as voting for GWB because he was a cool guy to hang with or because Kerry looked like Herman Munster.
i am shocked at the result of this poll... hillary is a fucking neo-con. wht the hell is wrong with you people?!?!?!?!?!? a snake in wolve's clothing! please! look at her record, her supporters, her campaign staff!!!! she is a phoney, lying, flip-flopping hawk!!! we are so doomed. christ!
Josh @ 73:
Plus, he stole Fox News' microwave oven.
I think that Colbert could do some damage in the Repugnikan primary in SC, partially because the field is so weak, and partially because there are Repugs who don't get Colbert's act.
Colbert is a comedian who plays a pompous conservative. Why would you seriously vote for him? He obviously is running as a joke, like all the things he does are for a joke. His skit on running was interesting because it showed that the republican candidates need $35K to run while a Dem candidate can run by getting signatures. He was teaching us something, all the while making us laugh. That's excellent but that certainly is not the kind of guy who would make a good president. He'd be no different than George W Bush, an egotistical idiot that gets away with doing or saying anything because no one takes him seriously.
Ridiculous.
I didn't have time to read all the posts, so I apologize if this repeats an earlier post in concept.
The picks leave one glaring omission..."No, I'm voting gay republican."
And maybe: "No, I'm voting straight/gay republican."
Either way, there's a whole shitpot of candidates.
I don't believe there is a "straight" republican ticket.
chorocardium @ 125:
Hey, that's right, didn't Aragorn present him with the sword that was broken on the show a few weeks ago?
Colbert must become either King of Gondor or President of the United States.
No way BillO has to be his VP.
JohnnyThief @ 51:
Then once again you don't get the right to complain...while you are in a secret prison camp.
P.S. You have the right to complain at any time in any place whether you vote or not!
Do not disenfranchise our young, wrongly imprisoned, or 'spoiled' voters.
P.P.S. Kucinich '08...I ordered my copy of the Pocket Constitution this morning!
If you don't have a pocket constitution you don't have a right to complain! Yeah!
on an lighter note....Edwards polled well over HC...two to one......
I wonder if they considered running Stewart/Colbert as independents as a joke? Ofcourse, they run the very reall risk of getting a lot of freaking votes, so maybe not.
Poll button doesn't work for me --- but my choice isn't presented anyway - like others here, I love Colbert, but my choice this time around will be the same as it was last time around: KUCINICH KUCINICH KUCINICH KUCINICH KUCINICH KUCINICH KUCINICH. You know, Dennis Kucinich. ; )
What about just a NO in the poll answers? I'm voting Kucinich.
No - Give me Kucinich, why is he not in your poll?
My god, he has an insurmountable lead!
Orangutan. @ 70:
Link is greatly appreciated, Orangutan. Having said that, this site tends to be informative the majority of the time and you can't simply just say C&L is "a political gossip blog." Assuming that even IS the case, you're putting way too much on the fine folks here by implying that they owe it to their readers to be all about business all the time. You're absolutely right when you say that C&L isn't an activist site; blogs typically don't have mission statements. It's a place to stay abreast of news and read other people's opinions.
But for keeping all of the readers in the loop to continue our fight in realspace, I salute you.
sheeple @ 118:
That goes double for you, sheeple. Blogs are not always waiting rooms for rallies or staging rooms for revolt. Deal with it. In the time that it took you to complain about something like a strictly-for-laughs poll, you could've been doing something better with your time. Relax.
Shelly @ 107:
The Colbert "attention hog" you refer to, is an act, a parody of all the right wing pundits...I'm sure that if he was actually prez...we'd see the real Colbert...I'd like to see Kucinich as prez. and Colbert maybe as veep or some cabinet position...throw in Stewart somewhere, and you got yerself a deal!!! As for Hillary....I just don't trust her...but I simply don't see myself voting republican if she's the candidate foisted upon us...and for the record...this year is the FIRST time ever, I've donated to a candidate...makes me feel all patriotic and shit!
Where is Kucinich?
Where's the choice for "I love Mr. Colbert, but I'd really have Mr. Stewart?"
Everybody thought GWBush was a joke too. And LOOK what we got.
Why not vote for Colbert?
I think he would make a much better president than mensa man.
there is only ONE condition.... he gets to keep his show.
Nope... But I would buy the man a beer and sit down and have one with him myself... Which is more than I can say I'd want to do for the idiot and chief...Kicking and beating are words that come to mind when I think of meeting that moron.. Thank goodness this is all make believe.... Good one Stevie. You are one dry mofo satireist, juuust like a good martini bravo......JD
I see Hillary has all the numbers.......God help us if she gets elected, she'll be just as bad as our current idiot-WarPig.
[...] le temps de passer du Daily Show de Jon Stewart, o
Login or Register to post comments.