You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (1137)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (3086)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

Everyone (except Shep Smith) at Fox News, including various reporters, spent the day yesterday whining about how mean the White House was being to them, telling everyone that they're a propaganda arm of the Republican Party. Guess the truth hurts. (More on that in a bit.)

It's funny they should say that. Because that same day, every single one of Fox's prime-time "opinion show" anchors devoted time and energy to running down President Obama -- and the Nobel committee -- for his just-announced Peace Prize.

Sean Hannity was so worked up, he devoted two whole segments to the subject, featuring the gnome who lives under the bridge Dick Morris and Mark Steyn. (You'll love Hannity's definition of "peace.") Bernie Goldberg ran through their comparable records of non-accomplishment and announced that he would win the prize next year. But the real corker, of course, came from Glenn Beck, who was able to figure out just what Obama's Nobel Peace Prize really meant:

It may be more revealing on how Europe and the rest of the world views Obama. He [Obama] is dismantling the United States one piece at a time.

And doing so, evidently, at the behest of his European masters. (But wait! I thought he was born in Kenya!)

This really is getting unseemly. A little carping could be expected, but for God's sake, can't any of these people get some perspective? The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the world's great honors, and it's an honor for it to go to an American.

Hannity, for instance, harps on the fact that Obama's nomination came only 12 days after he was inaugurated. But the committee keeps reviewing nominees -- including their current activities -- up until the final vote, which took place not long ago. So Hannity's point is a nonsequitur.

What never seems to occur to any of them is the obvious, simple and clear reason that Obama won the Nobel: He won the Presidency of the United States -- and in so doing, ended conservative-movement rule in America.

The entire world could see that the Bush administration, enabled by a Republican Congress, and fueled by an increasingly bellicose and irrational talk-show was the greatest threat to global peace since the fall of the Berlin Wall -- outpacing even the terrorist disturbances of Al Qaeda, particularly in lives lost. Nor would conservatives give up their hold on power readily; defeating them was no mean feat.

Entertaining such thoughts, though, would paralyze any well-trained right-winger in a fit of cognitive dissonance, so it never comes up on places like Fox.

Michael Moore may have put it best:

The simple fact that he was elected was reason enough for him to be the recipient of this year's Nobel Peace Prize.

Because on that day the murderous actions of the Bush/Cheney years were totally and thoroughly rebuked. One man -- a man who opposed the War in Iraq from the beginning -- offered to end the insanity. The world has stood by in utter horror for the past eight years as they watched the descendants of Washington, Lincoln and Jefferson light the fuse of our own self-destruction. We flipped off the nations on this planet by abandoning Kyoto and then proceeded to melt eight more years worth of the polar ice caps. We invaded two nations that didn't attack us, failed to find the real terrorists and, in effect, ignited our own wave of terror. People all over the world wondered if we had gone mad.

And if all that wasn't enough, the outgoing Joker presided over the worst global financial collapse since the Great Depression.

So, yeah, at precisely 11:00pm ET on November 4, 2008, Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. And the 66 million people who voted for him won it, too. By the time he took the stage at midnight ET in the Grant Park Historic Hippie Battlefield in downtown Chicago, billions of people around the globe were already breathing a huge sigh of relief. It was as if, in that instant, one man did bring the promise of peace to the world -- and most were ready to go wherever he wanted to go to achieve that end. Never before had the election of one man made every other nation feel like they had won, too. When you've got billions of people ready, willing and able to join a cause like this, well, a prize in Oslo is the least that you deserve.

It's also worth noting that the Peace Prize historically has gone to those -- like Martin Luther King -- who have produced important transformative steps in the furtherance of civil rights and the healing of the racial divide, which has produced so much misery and inflicted so much violence in America alone. Obama's election as the first African-American president represents just such a moment, and he deserves recognition for that alone as well.

The Fox folks need to get a grip. And if they wonder why the White House sees them as reflexively opposed to everything and anything Obama does, they should just play the above video as a reminder.



Login or Register to post comments.

68 comments

"...since circumstances have placed me in the unfortunate position of prosecuting two wars at the present time, I cannot accept...."

It would have introduced a refreshing note of truthfulness among friend and foe alike.

)O(

Or he could send an American Indian to accept it on his behalf.

.

Too crazy for me. I really try to keep faith in my fellow Americans, even the RW ones but the fact that FNS has a loyal audience is just confusing.

I expect some folks to be uninformed but FNS misinforms.

UGH!

have been squeezed out by the "liberal Media". And now it's a level playing field.

Groovy

.

.

Please...
... THERE IS NO LIBERAL MAINSTREAM MEDIA IN AMERICA.

Please name the Liberal Network that PLATFORMS:
~ "SINGLE PAYER"
~ Women's Rights
~ Gay Rights
~ Prosecuting BushCo

.

)O(

Tue, 10/13/2009 - 09:08 — Evet

Groovy

______________________________________________________

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B8k3wzHUvE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e36gLfrmRCw

..its called "dis-information". Confuse the other side, all smoke and mirrors.

He kinda looks just like You Know Who, huh?

shanty-Irish thug I ever met, growing up in the middle of such witless, grunting, cretinous trogs...

...

A new word!! You should post prognathous somewhere Orrin Hatch can see it, so he'll have a new polysyllabic to misuse!

for being the terrorists they are.

and turn this award over to him!

and apologize to the hard working President Obama for all FOX's lies.

between Nobel Peace Prize winner's administration's attack on Fox News and their whining about 'Far left internet fringes' insufficiently Pro-Obama slant.

Whiner-in-Chief
--John NIchols
The Nation

The Obama administration really needs to get over itself.

First, the president and his aides go to war with Fox News because the network maintains a generally anti-Obama slant.

Then, an anonymous administration aide attacks bloggers for failing to maintain a sufficiently pro-Obama slant.

These are not disconnected developments.

An administration that won the White House with an almost always on-message campaign and generally friendly coverage from old and new media is now frustrated by its inability to control the debate and get the coverage it wants. ....

Read the whole thing.

The EXACT kind of thing that was always disdained here.

It says more about the stupidity of journalists than it does Obama.

First, does having the White House Communications director state
the truth about Fox News constitute : "the president and his aides go to war" Hardly.

Second, the reporter then connects an alleged comment made anonymously by someone called "an adviser" to the gay rights march and other events as do others in the press. The original reporter, Hammond, works for a paper which has had to fire more than one reporter for making stories up.

Sorry, Mr. Nichols shows that the insensitivity to criticism resides more with the journalism and blogging profession than the President.

Reading some of the stuff being dredged on the "liberal" blogs and "liberal" journalists is making me wonder if even the safe haven of progressive interests isn't being taken over by snark.

I, too, am frustrated at the pace the prez is moving. The healthcare debate has sucked all of the oxygen out of the administration and now conservatives AND liberals are eager to pounce.

We need to stop with the trivia of what the media is shoveling and focus on getting the agendas we support pushed through the congress.

We need to be more like Grayson - support our own and trample the opposition.

Why hasn't Obama fixed in ten months everything that Dumbya took eight years to screw up?

I mean, it's not like the Republicans aren't bi-partisan and obstruct everything and anything that comes up...

/snark

FOX

F*cked Up Xenophobes

********************

dennis, you're back! Still spewing your insupportable and largely irrelevant crap, though...

Just stand back and let the inevitable implosion progress. Hopefully when it happens, they'll take the wingnut 23%ers with them.

The most disturbing thing about the current state of affairs is that all these things they are frothing about are not true.

The stupidity and hypocrisy of all the Faux Noise liars never disappoints anybody.

Let's see . . .

Oily Taint was just tagged for $20k for the stupid. . .

So that means Obama really IS Kenyan.(not)

Will FNS cover the story and her legal spanking by the judge? (not bloody likely!)

lol

"What never seems to occur to any of them is the obvious, simple and clear reason that Obama won the Nobel: He won the Presidency of the United States -- and in so doing, ended conservative-movement rule in America."

Shouldn't the Nobel then have gone to the American people instead?

>"Shouldn't the Nobel then have gone to the American people instead?"

It did, he is our elected leader.

The posted paragraphs from Michael Moore are the clearest statement I have read to date about why Obama deserves the prize. Well said, Michael!

Maybe the Goppers should finance a Nobel War Prize. You know, to give the "baddists" a chance.

)O(

and in so doing, ended conservative-movement rule in America."

The best that you can say is that he may have briefly interrupted one wing of the movement.

But conservative 'rule' in Murka is prospering fine, thanks.

Obama's main job was/is to give the people someone they could detest enough to forget the Busheviks, and thereby prepare the way for the next/final assault on Democracy...Being 'black,' he was already half way there...

Moore's own movie demonstrated as clearly and concisely as ever you'd like, that the "conservative movement" was never healthier, based on the support it gets from the elected officialdom, in the form of give-aways, bail-outs, and the like...

those assholes from La-La Land...your watching and reporting on what they say/do keeps me from throwing my dinner away each nite. Thanks.

.

.

Sure,
A News Network that PLATFORMS for the G(no)P...
A News Network that PLATFORMS their hope for FAILURE of the future of America...

... OUGHT TO BE MADE TO FEEL PUT ASIDE!

IT'S CALLED COMEUPPANCE!

.

I'll agree that, compared to George Bush, Barack Obama is the essence of responsible, peaceful goodness. The Bush/Cheney regime was so awful, so mean, so crooked, so universally terrifying that it's no big wonder why anybody that promises a modicum of hope for a better future would seem to glisten in the sun like a newly minted butterfly.

Even so, from the perspective of a guy that voted for Obama, his progress towards fulfilling his election promises is agonizingly slow. Clever Norwegians may have given him a Nobel on credit, but what I'm seeing is slow to no progress on getting out of Iraq and Afghani-Nam. In fact, Obama just sent 16 thousand more troops to Afghani-Nam. Sixteen thousand more targets for people that don't want us there.

Obama has not prosecuted Bush and Cheney's war crimes, he hasn't stopped telcos from spying on us, he hasn't ended DADT, he hasn't pushed for universal health care, and he hasn't pushed to repeal the vile Patriot Act. Me, I don't pass out prizes for promises not kept, even if Obama's envoys are no longer telling foreigners to screw themselves.

Compared to Bush, Obama seems like a saint. But so would a rooster in office. Because at least a rooster couldn't reap much damage to the country. (his handlers might get some nasty pecks and scratches though!)

Fact is, I have yet to see the big O deliver on most of his insinuated progressive campaign promises, or make much meaningful progress toward rescinding Bush's 'conservative' policies/crimes. SNL sums up what Obama has done quite nicely in this clip: http://www.hulu.com/watch/99945/saturday-nigh...

Alfred Nobel wrote in his will that the Nobel Peace Prize shall go to the "one who has DONE the MOST or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." (Or so wikipedia tells me.) If we go by this definition, it seems clear that a man expanding a war from Afghanistan into Pakistan should not receive it, despite whatever his intentions may be. These criteria seem often to not be applied though, given past recipients. And so if it was really given to Obama for being the first black president, then kudos to him and America. But it is clear he could be doing a lot more to fit the above definition, if only he would fulfill his campaign 'promises'.

Let's not turn blind to Obama's faults here people.

it is like talking to "bushies" here. EVERYTHING is great without question. From the ditch on the right to the ditch on the left.

yep

the not bush NPP and everyone is "PROUD", with not enough sense to be embarrassed. We have made NO change from Bush. Noone can name one.

They wanted to give it to the American people for getting rid of Bush and not electing Grampy McBomb-Bomb.

But they had to give it to a rep of the American people.

yep

the not bush award, but like googpoints said:
Alfred Nobel wrote in his will that the Nobel Peace Prize shall go to the "one who has DONE the MOST or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

)O(

I don't think what shammity did was a non-sequitur

As much as it is tangential and an ignoratio elenchi.

upset concerned about this, what they need to do is move to Norway, meet the requirements Norway has to be able to vote, and vote the Nobel Peace Prize Committee members out of the Norwegian Parliament.

That's the only way any of this would be their business, or concern.

They would rather bitch and cry here.

bitching about someone bitching. Crying about crybabies. HAHA

They don't know where Norway is.

are someone who feels differntly than you?

)O(

President Obama is aleady getting help writing his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech by this person:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IynQCmqvXZs

I hate myself for laughing so hard.

OMG

her hair!!

Never thought they would share anything, but yet.

needs to be bitch slapped into the next century.

Somebody needs to start pointing out the obvious. It's a pity it has to be the White House but none of the other "legitimate" media (print, cable) can bring themselves to do it lest they be branded liberal Obama apologists.

)O(

"Then its pundits bitch"

The only thing the right is good at. It certainly isn't government or economics...

When the Right is in power, they screw up all over the place and prove their pet theory "Government Doesn't Work!"

When in the minority, the Right does NOTHING but obstruct so they can whine,"See, Government Doesn't Work!"

Conservatism doesn't work, unless you're a billionaire or a bigot.

)O(

Re: Fox wonders why White House sees them as reflexively anti-O
Tue, 10/13/2009 - 10:05 — MaudeLebowski
___________________________________________________

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FilYgi_LZ_c

Hannity: "Liberals define peace as the absence of conflict, I define peace, very simply, to defend yourself and destroy evil enemies"

Are there we have it in a nutshell, the entire Neo-con philosophy of the previous 8 years, "Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out".

Nice going Sean, did you study at the General Patton wing of the Rand Corp.? And who do you define as our "evil enemies", anyone who happens to disagree with Bush's foreign policy?

Hannity is so vapid that it's mind boggling. SIMPLE fits him and his argument well.

)O(

I always defined peace as the time needed to reload.

Besides being spot-on, it is pretty damned funny, as usual.

I think it solidifies Stewart as the Anti-MSM News Guy and secures his place as America's "Most trusted newscaster"

Check it out.

It sounds good but it is still wrong. How can destroy be used in a definition of peace?

And we laugh at repubs for saying things in newspeak.

I'd rather live and die with Europe than whatever segment of America Hannity represents. He seems to forget that the majority of the electorate voted for Obama because of the reasons he was awarded the Nobel Prize for!

Typical bullies. People FOX has shit on for 18 years are pushing back, and now thet're whining like 3 year olds.

Whatever the case, you're right; they have been reflexivly crapping on everybody who is not neocon since their beginning.

Now it's pitiful lamentations of how horribly they're being mistreated.

Buncha punk-ass crybabies.

"The Fox folks need to get a grip"

Ah let 'em whine-I'm enjoying the hell out of it.
You couldn't ask for a better illustration of how afraid they are of this man now.Their fear is palpable.
Oh Sean? .........BOO!

We all know that Faux News is the propaganda arm of the right wing, but consider the following about the President. Obama has just authorized an additional 13,000 troops, on top off the 21,000 authorized in March, to be sent to Afghanistan. This is clearly an escalation and makes this Obama's war. Frontline will have an interesting program on the Afghan War this evening. Furthermore, the size of the forces in Iraq are increasing, as private contractors are adding personnel to cover troop withdrawls that are not yet happening! Nobel Peace Prize, I don't think so.

FOX (so-called) News is so deep into the ZERO-ZONE that I don't pay them ANY mind at all. To give this 5th rate organization credit for what it observes or states is akin to giving credit to what an ill-tempered spoiled schoolyard brat might complain about. It is a waste of my time.

even if i had a teevee , and why is it that whenever i see sean ( here ) he always seems to have a pen in his hand ? , to look smart or playing with his pecker .
fns can go pick shit with chickens .

"The audacity of hope" colliding with "The reality of the situation"

that Raygun or gwb instead of Obama. Truly pathetic.

68 comments

Login or Register to post comments.