Today on the Imus show, Don prodded Tim to tell his audience why Scooter Libby called him in the first place to complain about something he saw on MSN
November 21, 2005

A picture named Imus-Russert.jpgToday on the Imus show, Don prodded Tim to tell his audience why Scooter Libby called him in the first place to complain about something he saw on MSNBC. Part of Scooter's defense to Fitzgerald has been that Tim Russert told him Valerie Plame's name during a phone call. Russert has denied that categorically and by using Libby's own notes we know Tim is correct. Isn't "little Russ," being a self important hypocrite by refusing to tell us exactly what Scooter had to say to him while he analyses everyone else in the Plame case including Booby?

icon Download -WMP icon Download -QT

(rough transcript)

Russert: Libby called me to complain about something he had seen on MSNBC...

Imus: What did he complain about on MSNBC, do you remember?

Russert: I haven't gone into it,--you know-publicly-cause I just didn't want to get involved with all that viewer complaints, but I do remember it because of his language that he chose and that's why- I actually called Ben Shapiro, the president of NBC news and said I just gave your direct line to this guy named Lewis Scooter Libby, who is upset about something he watched on TV and you may hear from him.

Imus: Was it Chris Matthews?

Russert: It could be you...

This call is at the heart of the case and Russert is keeping his usually loose lips sealed. Why was Libby calling him instead of MSNBC directly anyway? Obviously-Libby cursed Chris Matthews out to Tim, so the "lack of memory" defense will be useless. There are so many reporters that are connected to Plame-Gate that it's nauseating. I believe they had nothing to do with the leak of Valerie's name, but the White House is kicking them around like overstuffed pinatas. They used them in the run up to the war and now are having a second helping here. You can see why people do not trust the old school journalists in the beltway anymore. They let you know something only when it's advantageous for them to do so.

Russert must know that it will come out at trial, but he refuses to speak about it now. I can understand wanting to protect your friend, but now it's time to let go. Isn't he holding back as much information as Woodward did to the public because we know he already gave it to Fitzmas? Michael Smerconish, says that Libby was mad at Chris Matthews for attacking the neocons on TV, but it also maybe a little deeper than that depiction. Michael called Chris and got an interesting response that you can read here. Come on Tim and spill the beans already. Each time you refuse to tell what you know, you give your profession another black eye. I guess that comes out to about fifty so far. You're going to need laser surgery just to read your cue cards soon.

Can you help us out?

For 18 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.