An appeals court has summarily denied the city’s desperate ploy to vacate the district court’s thorough decision.
November 24, 2013

NYPD Officer Risks His Job to Speak Out Against "Stop-and-Frisk"

An appeals court has declined NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg's attempt to continue the NYPD's Stop and Frisk policy, all but ending the argument once and for all.

In August, Judge Shira Scheindlin of Federal District Court found the NYPD's Stop and Frisk policy, which stopped young minority men on the street, to be unconstitutional. But Bloomberg vowed to fight the ruling, and actually scored some minor victories as Scheindlin was removed from the case and her order for an independent monitor to oversee the police department was blocked.

On Friday, however, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found that Scheindlin's ruling still stands, and that the appeal process should continue to run its course over the next few months. But alas, Bloomberg is out of time. In just over a month, Bloomberg will be the former mayor of New York, and the new mayor, Bill de Blasio, has vowed to end the city's appeal of the ruling.

"This marks the end of the Bloomberg administration's effort to short-circuit the appeals process and undo the district court's rulings before Bill de Blasio takes office," Christopher Dunn, the associate legal director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, told the New York Times.

While the city will still appeal the ruling over the next few weeks, there's little chance it would be successful in such a short time.

So much for Michael Bloomberg's agenda.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon