November 26, 2021

Is this about taking the phenomenon seriously, or yet another attempt to cover up things the Pentagon would rather we didn't know? Stay tuned! Via CBS News:

The Defense Department has announced a new UFO task force to help the U.S. government spot and identify unknown objects in the air and determine whether they pose any threats. The agency announced on Tuesday it is creating the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) to "synchronize" Washington's efforts to "detect, identify and attribute objects of interests in Special Use Airspace," and "assess and mitigate any associated threats to safety of flight and national security." An Airborne Object Identification and Management Executive Council, comprised of defense and intelligence officials, will oversee the new task force.

"Incursions by any airborne object into our [Special Use Airspace] pose safety of flight and operations security concerns, and may pose national security challenges," the Department of Defense said in a press release. "DOD takes reports of incursions — by any airborne object, identified or unidentified — very seriously, and investigates each one." The task force is the successor of the Navy's Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, which released a report in June on their findings about UFOs, or what they call "unidentified aerial phenomena." Officials at the time had investigated 144 reports of unidentified flying objects, most of which were reported within the last two years. According to their report, they were only able to identify one of those objects — a "large, deflating balloon." As for the other numerous mysterious flying objects, officials said they haven't found any evidence suggesting they came from space and that nearly all the incidents they investigated remain unexplained.

And while they are still unsure what the objects actually were, or where they came from, they do know one thing for certain: the objects were real. "From a safety of flight issue, we absolutely do believe that what we are seeing are not simply sensor artifacts. These are things that physically exist," a senior government official said in June. "They are physical objects." The task force is going to implement guidance and more details in the coming weeks about their specific plans.

Since I've been watching this issue for years, I wonder if this just an attempt to head off the legislation Kirsten Gillibrand has been pushing to make UFO study by the U.S. government more transparent and accountable:

Via The Hill:

As first reported by veteran researcher Douglas Dean Johnson, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s (D-N.Y.) proposed legislation would fundamentally transform the government’s approach to the UFO phenomenon. Indeed, the Gillibrand amendment would shift decades of official, Cold War-induced deflection and obfuscation towards increasingly transparent, objective scientific analysis.

If adopted, Gillibrand’s proposal would expand significantly on House-approved legislation authored by Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) that establishes a government office tasked with analyzing and evaluating UFO reporting from U.S. military and intelligence personnel.

Critically, the Gillibrand amendment requires the government to submit comprehensive annual reports on UFO activity in an unclassified format. If the proposed legislation is passed as written, it would mandate unprecedented government transparency on the UFO phenomenon. This alone should prompt interested citizens to contact their elected representatives regarding Gillibrand’s bold amendment to the 2022 National Defense Authorization Act.

Can you help us out?

For nearly 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon