Waaaah!!!! Sean Hannity wants him an Obama White House scalp too! Too bad his attack on Jennings is BS.
By David Neiwert Thursday Oct 01, 2009 4:00pm
Sean Hannity just came out and said it last night before his "All-American Panel": He's attacking Kevin Jennings, the Obama White House's "School Safety Czar," for ostensibly looking the other way when informed of a teenage boy's affair with an older man.
Hannity, you see, thinks he abetted "statutory rape" and displayed "bad judgment." Therefore:
Hannity: I want him fired!
As usual, Media Matters has the whole story:
Despite evidence to the contrary, Fox News -- led by Sean Hannity -- and other right-wing media have claimed that Department of Education official Kevin Jennings "cover[ed] up statutory rape" and violated Massachusetts law by not reporting to authorities a 1988 conversation in which a high school student told Jennings about his relationship with an older man. In fact, Jennings' attorney wrote in a 2004 letter that the student was 16 years old, which is -- and was at the time -- the legal age of consent in Massachusetts.
What exactly should Jennings have reported to authorities, Sean?
Hannity is just seething with jealousy, and you can tell it. Glenn Beck has two scalps already, and he wants one too, just to keep up. The behind-the-scenes rumors are that Hannity despises Beck and the feeling is mutual -- and that, moreover, Beck is gunning for Hannity's prime evening slot.
Too bad for Hannity he's shooting blanks again with this takedown try. Here's wishing you even worse luck next time, Sean.
Greg Sargent at the PlumLine has more, as does Steve Benen.
Login or Register to post comments.
Dueling rectums.
primus!
Dueling rectums. very good but they have more brains in their rectums then their heads!
republicanism is a mental illness!
Any way we can pit these two against each other and do the work for us?
But it is a nice thought. To bad they are both cowards, beside being morons.
republicanism is a mental illness!
to these vermin!
Now you're insulting the vermin.
to the death for it...
I see some entertaining TV there
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Uev9UYZjKA
.
It's the FAUX NEWS Smackdown of the CENTUREEEE-E-E-e-e!
In one corner, Glen "Conspiracy" Beck, up and comer gunning for PRIME TIME held by none other than Sean "The Bomb" Hannity!
Who will be the winner? Who will end up with the coveted FAUX NEWS Primetime slot?
Stay tuned to FAUX NEWS for ALL the gory details!
Let's get ready to RUMMMMMBLE-BLE-ble-ble!!
A Freaking idiot!
That pretty well covers the schumk.
And I mean that with all due respect!
someone needs to squeeze Sean's head like a pimple.
It is festering and foul.
full of puss........
Comparing Hannity's brain to puss is an uncalled for attack on puss and I won't have it!
I wanted to compare him to an amoeba, but amoebas have feelings to. (i've heard, sort of :p )
I suppose if you really wanted to insult Hannity you could compare him to Beck?
and more popular.
....being composed of individuals who loyally give up their very lives in defending against foreign and cancerous attackers, unlike the Republican Party, which is analogous to an auto-immune disease...
days here in Orlando. Both days billed as a "special edition" of The Sean (Should-be-shanked) Redumption; I was hoping for reruns. Sadly, I guess everyday is now a "special sedition"--Conservatives Under
SewageSiege, or some such crap...Anyway, he was blathering about this issue today, and I swear that his tone was not one of even faux outrage; it almost sounded like he was turned on. I half expected to hear some muffled slapping sounds off mic. (And no, I hadn't started drinking yet...)
You are missing the big picture and thus wasting your time.
Fox means to trivialize politics and they succeed.
Beck's attack on Van Jones was BS. That is what they do.
It is all BS.
We have junk politics.
Why do the upper 1% have two political parties that represent them, and the remaining 99% have no political representation.
Why does the upper 1% own half of the country?
Why doesn't Fox ask questions like that?
Why doesn't any of the media ask such questions?
What they want is junk politics.
With rabid fans (voters) who support their team - no matter how lame or harmful they are.
Rah! Rah! Sis boom bullshit.
Most of us know that it really is BS. I don't waste my time, but it seems to me like you may, waste your time, by telling us this?
And again, I do mean this with all respect!
The title of the post is:
That refers, I presume in the first place, to the successful attack on Van Jones. If rather implies to my thinking, that the attack had merit, whereas the new attack does not.
Neither attack had merit.
It is all junk politics.
Van Jones was a most highly qualified person for his position and Obama made a serious mistake in not supporting him.
Fox wins because their viewers have been brainwashed into this junk politic.
Here we are joining in as well.
The war cannot be fought on this level, and won.
Get the wingnuts to wonder why they are not making ends meet, why they are making only slightly more than they did thirty years ago.
Get them asking why the Fat Cat One Per Cent owns half the country, and maybe you will get some traction.
That is my point and I am sorry that you totally missed it.
I view each comment on its own.
I spend an enormous amount of time studying our condition and thinking of how to improve it. Some of it may be wasted effort if I don't reach anyone.
Look at the comments and give me a scientific analysis on how many join in the froth. It starts with the post, many of the posts only deal with the froth. Maybe I am wasting my time thinking that people should have greater gravitas.
So.
I do read and appreciate your intelligent comments, even if I often just take "the low road."
I know you are passionate about what you discuss. Even if I don't join the discussion, I never think that your comments are "a waste of time."
Please keep up the good work.
So how do Hannity and Beck complain or try to put the other one down to their superiors? Do they tell Roger Ailes that the other guy is just not insane enough?
at separate (miniature) golf courses.
a comment to him about "acting" when he goes on the air? As if he thinks none of them are sincere?
They're always sincere even if they have to fake it.
I am sick and tired of these dip shit turd balls stirring up this crap. This one offends my very core.
If Obama cows down to this one...he has lost my support.
Obama caved on Van Jones, and that appeased Beck. Oh, wait, that didn't happen. Beck is emboldened now, and so is Hannity. They want more blood. Is Obama going to give it to them? I say Jennings will be gone by the weekend. I doubt Obama is going to stick up for him.
Valerie Jarret is next. Beck already has her in his sights.
It just sounds like baby Sean is jealous.
I am reaaly tired of all this bed-wetting masquerading as "journalism".
The more they do it, the more they become less credible until there is no competent journalism left, and the only way to get the truth about important matters is to dig it up yourself.
Oh wait, it's already happened.
1. Who'da thunk competing ego-maniacal ideologues wouldn't get along?
and
2. Regarding "Too bad for Hannity he's shooting blanks" Just cause he's shooting blanks, doesn't mean it won't work.
Is she going to throw a temper tantrum on TV or is she going to complain her panties are to tight. Does this Bitch ever say anything that can be grounded in Fact other than her hiding closet gayness, she has got to be gay as no Bitch except one like her would whine and cry so much. Is it true she asked the producers to let her give them a blow job so they would write better fiction for her.
Isn't it fun to watch Hannity's giagantic encephalus head bobbing back and forth like a gigantic dump in David Vitter's diaper when he dances cheek to cheek with his whore. Good Lord what a moron he is. I'm sure he wet himself too. Oh the outrage!
hannity might have something here. Even if the student wasn't technically a minor, I know some states regulate the relationship between certain authority figures and those who seek or are otherwise under their authority when they're at such a young age.
However, that being said, where was shammity when priests were debriefing alter boys?
Desperately trying to forget.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKZcLEY2qEY
I remember having it as a 45. Must have been shortened to fit on the vinyl.
They had a longer version on Youtube, but it came linked to two other unrelated songs by different artists.
"Where was shammity when priests were debriefing altar boys?"
In line.
!!
Life must really suck for Hannity if Beck has stolen his thunder.
.
Shouldn't he have gotten just as riled at Sarah for Bristol taking older Levi's dong outside of wedlock and not reporting it?
let's be fair here.
What happened between Levi and Bristol was legal in AK
http://touchngo.com/lglcntr/akstats/Statutes/...
Party of family values.
I guess they missed the class on morals.
that its immoral for a 17 and a 18 year old to have sex?
Or that its immoral not to report a legal act?
They can't do. That's what I'm saying. And That's all I'm saying. We both know whats moral and immoral. Different states laws don't mean much, when we know what moral is. Both parties have this problem. I'll say that. It's just you don't hear the Democratic party calling themselves the party of family values and preaching to have a higher moral standard.
That's what I'm sayin. That's all. I'd luv to stay and chat with you on this one Tim, But I have to go pay taxes tomorrow. buenos noches.
Good nachos?
That must mean you got the extra jalapenos.
The lying jerk being replaced by the insane jerk.
His lawyer must of forgot to inform Jennings of that.
Jennings in 2000 told a GLSEN conference that Brewster told him he “’met someone in the bus station bathroom and I went home with him.’ High school sophomore, 15 years old. That was the only way he knew how to meet gay people. I was a closeted gay teacher, 24 years old, didn’t know what to say, knew I should say something quickly. So I finally, my best friend had just died of AIDS the week before, I looked at Brewster and said, ‘You know, I hope you knew to use a condom.’
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/09/oba...
Also if the boy was 16 I think this section of the code would cover it.
http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/272-4.htm
Chapter 272: Section 4. Inducing person under eighteen to have sexual intercourse
Section 4. Whoever induces any person under 18 years of age of chaste life to have unlawful sexual intercourse shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than three years or in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Wow, there are some pretty interesting laws up there in Massachusetts!
How about this one:
Section 14. A married person who has sexual intercourse with a person not his spouse or an unmarried person who has sexual intercourse with a married person shall be guilty of adultery and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than three years or in jail for not more than two years or by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars.
Or this:
Section 18. Whoever commits fornication shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than three months or by a fine of not more than thirty dollars.
Or this:
Section 34. Whoever commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with a beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than twenty years.
etc etc ...
riot. Screw hannity.
Who is Beck's other "scalp"? I mean, I know about Van Jones, but I don't recall any others.
For a party whose leaders do things like troll airport restrooms, or disappear to meet their Argentinian lovers, you guys got BALLS!!! Even Pres Clinton, the immoral bastard, only engaged in consensual sex with full-grown women! And who the fuck abandoned his cancer-stricken, dying wife to get on with his life? Can you say "Newtie"???? KISS MY ENTIRE ASS, you sanctimonius FUCKS!!!!
Why is the pimple-cream saleman Pat Boone on this panel? The man is a walking example of con-man, he has no credibility whatsoever.
It's my firm belief that the only reason he hates LGBT people is that somewhere in his Hollywood career he got cornholed and enjoyed it and is trying to live the lie that he's straight.
Login or Register to post comments.