Republicans are divided on Iraq. And domestic policy. And political strategies. But even more dramatically, they're really divided over the chair
January 15, 2007

Republicans are divided on Iraq. And domestic policy. And political strategies.

But even more dramatically, they're really divided over the chairmanship of the Republican National Committee.

The week after the Republicans were handed a series of devastating election defeats, the White House announced that Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) would take over as RNC chair. If recent history held, there was no appeal in the process -- the national committee has historically rubber-stamped sitting presidents' choice for party chairs.

But not this time, not with this president, and not with Martinez, who was immediately a controversial choice. The Republican base labeled him the "Harriet Miers of RNC chairs" and went to work in opposition to his selection.

At this point, with the Republican National Committee poised to make its decision, it looks like the fight could get ugly.

Help Us Fight Back Against Social Media Censorship

Facebook has been limiting the visibility of our posts after a serious of bogus violations. We need your help now more than ever.

Discussion

We are currently migrating to Disqus

On May 14, 2022, we started migrating our comments from Insticator back to Disqus. During this transition period, some posts will have Insticator and some Disqus. For more information on the transition, as well as information regarding old C&L accounts, please see this post.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.