Read time: 1 minute

Ben Carson Says Obamacare Violates Constitution's General Welfare Clause

To get to his conclusion, the entire idea of general welfare is turned on its head.
Ben Carson Says Obamacare Violates Constitution's General Welfare Clause

Everyone is climbing on the crazy train early this year. Ben Carson is the first entertainer on the Nutcase Express, bringing us his bizarre reasoning for why he opposes the ACA.

Right Wing Watch:

In an interview last week with Washington Times Radio host Andy Parks, Ben Carson said that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional because it violates the U.S. Constitution’s provision that the government must “promote the general welfare” of the nation.

The likely GOP presidential candidate explained that the law helps some people while hurting others, so is therefore unconstitutional: “Your solution should be something that represents all the people. The Constitution says one of the purposes, in the preamble, it says is for the ‘promote the general welfare.’ What that means is that we do things that help everybody, we don’t pick this group and say, ‘We’re going to help you at the expense of this group over here.’ That’s not promoting the general welfare so we’re actually violating the Constitution in that sense.”

In that case, a whole host of laws could be considered unconstitutional since nearly everyone can point to a law that they think affects them negatively while helping others. “It wasn’t really about health care, it’s about control,” Carson said of the health care law.

Alrighty then. So it's perfectly fine to exclude a group of people with no access to health care and call that promoting the general welfare?

Sure thing, Ben.


Tags:

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.