Read time: 2 minutes

Why Bill O'Reilly Is Out At Fox News

Bill O'Reilly wasn't pushed out because of his serial sexual harassment, he was pushed out because he didn't generate enough revenue -- this quarter. This is an important lesson for Activists to learn.
Why Bill O'Reilly Is Out At Fox News
Two serial sexual harassers compare hand size Image from: Screengrab by 37Knucklehead

Bill O'Reilly is out at Fox News. This is excellent news.

I'm going to brag about WHY he is out at Fox News. Not that he is out, but why. Because there is a significant point I want to make.

O'Reilly didn't get pushed out because he is a serial sexual harasser, or because he called for the killing of Dr. Tiller. He wasn't pushed out because he cost Fox News millions in lawsuits (he generated more in revenue than the lawsuits.)

Story from the News Corp owned business publication, The Wall Street Journal.

That, combined with advertisers not wanting to link their brand with his, is what got him pushed out.

Also, new management, the Gretchen Carlson lawsuit and additional pending lawsuits, all played a role.

When I wrote this last week I ended with the line "What to do next about O'Reilly." Hint- Institutional investors

As we can see the answer was: Get rid of Bill O'Reilly.

The ratings for a show can be huge, but if they aren't making money, something needs to change. I looked at what the interested third parties (institutional investors) wanted, and what they didn't want, and I appealed to them. Those people had more power over the fate of O'Reilly than even Rupert Murdoch.

Because when people who expect their investment to earn money don't get what they want, they act. The investors needed an excuse to get rid of O'Reilly, one that would fit into what they want.-- which is more money-- this quarter. As long as he generated money for them, he could keep going.

People like Murdoch, and the Mercers, are still willing to "invest" money in right wing media in exchange for pushing propaganda. Murdoch does this with The New York Post even though he loses $110 million every single year.

The Mercers gave Breitbart and Steve Bannon $10 million--with no expectation of them generating revenue, just the propaganda.  The Heritage Foundation gives Rush Limbaugh millions now since most customer-facing advertisers won't advertise.

But public media companies--with non-family stockholders--expect the shows to generate revenue.  That is why back in 2005 I focused on methods to reduce the revenue the right-wing radio and TV hosts generated.  Reducing the revenue the hosts generated, reduced their support for them. That is the equation.

As always, Star Trek has a perfect quote:

Ruk: THAT was the equation. EXISTENCE!... SURVIVAL... must cancel out... programming!

Paramount Pictures "Star Trek: What Are Little Girls Made Of? (#1.7)" (1966)

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage


New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team