Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) pointed out that Barrett is part of a larger pattern of a lack of diversity in judges, particularly among Trump appointees. He asked Randall Noel, of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, to speak to the importance of diversity on the federal bench:
Yesterday, in response to a question from Senator Booker, Judge Barrett could not name a single book, study or law review that in any way addressed racial discrimination and its legacy in American law. I’m not suggesting in any way that that’s disqualifying. I’m simply saying that at a time when such books are best sellers, at a time when this central, challenging issue for the United States and for our legal system about how to address, recognize, combat the legacy of racial discrimination, I just wondered if you could briefly speak to the importance of diversity on the bench in the legal community more broadly?
Her failure to respond to Senator Booker’s question yesterday with a specific example - I did not mean to imply suggested any bias. Just it led me to question whether or not having broader diversity on our courts would bring into the decision-making role those who bring personal insight and experience and whether or not all who serve on the bench and in Congress should be more aware of this challenge facing our nation.
Cornyn (R-TX) jumped in to begin whitesplaining: