Whose the one raging? If I'm not mistaken it appears you're the one going a bit unhinged in this thread.
I said below that I'm confident she is morally against it but I also highly doubt that would stop her from supporting it much in the same way moral concerns mean nothing to our current president who has supported off-shore drilling, Arctic drilling, the TPP, Wall Street welfare, and so much more that he openly railed against in his campaigns.
Anyone who is taking large donations from Wall Street, fossil fuel companies, school & prison privatization companies, and national security contractors is not someone who will be on the side of the 99%. That goes for Hillary just as much as it has been proven by Obama.
That is why many of us here support Sanders over Clinton. We don't want another president that counts people like Geithner, Summers, Arne Duncan, Jeffrey Immelt, Robert Gates, Holder, Petraeus, Panetta, Hayden, etc... as the right people to help direct the affairs of this nation.
If you're happy with a government that expand our wars to twice as many countries as the previous administration, continues giving out welfare to Wall Street and fossil fuel companies, pushes for for-profit education and prisons, expanded for-profit national security, and every other possible way to siphon money from tax payers to profiteers then go for it. But don't condemn those of us who are hopeful for a new direction.
Kicked in the head too many times, brain reduced to mush.
Unless the murder victim had actual wings and a harp, and is an immortal being, I suspect he "was no angel."
You said it.
Your troll powers are still juvenile in development. I hope to see you flourish in years to come. You're doing well, but I see greatness in your future. BAAHHHH Goes the Sheep.