via Think Progress: The answer makes clear that Rove not only had a duty not to disclose the identity of a covert CIA agent, but he also had an affirmative duty prior to confirming Plames identity with a reporter to first confirm through an authorized official that the information has, in fact, been declassified. Thus, the argument by Rove allies, as reported by CNN, that Rove was the recipient of information, not a provider is irrelevant. Instead of saying I heard that, too, Roves answer to Novak should have been no comment
By John Amato
— July 16, 2005