Read time: 2 minutes

Cafferty On Specter's New NSA Court Review

Cafferty knows that the elections are coming and Specter has done what we have expected. I'll get a good video clip out of Lindsey Graham, if he gets

TSR-Cafferty-NSA.jpg Cafferty knows that the elections are coming and Specter has done what we have expected. I'll get a good video clip out of Lindsey Graham, if he gets the jitters again from all the caffeine he drinks before he starts his defense of the administration.

icon Download -WMP icon Download -QT

Cafferty: Interesting political development today, Wolf. The White House has now agreed, apparently, to a court review of the NSA domestic eavesdropping program. That’s big of them, don’t you think? Senator Arlen Specter says President Bush will sign a bill that would authorize the FISA court to review the constitutionality of the program. Specter says this is “a recognition by the President that he does not have a blank check.” But Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy calls the legislation “an interesting bargain”.

Leahy says it’s like the President saying, “If you do every single thing I tell you to do, then I’ll do what I should’ve done anyway.” Leahy’s making reference, of course, to the laws that are already on the books about all of this, which up to this point have been ignored by the Administration. Meanwhile, the White House says it doesn’t think any of this is necessary, but it’s willing to work with Congress. Can you tell the midterm elections are getting closer?

Jane Harman takes a surprisingly tough stand against Specter and this measure:

In a separate interview, Representative Jane Harman of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said she saw the Specter-White House agreement as an “end run” around the FISA law requiring the approval of individual wiretapping warrants.

“I have great respect for this guy,” she said of Mr. Specter, “but he hasn’t been briefed on this program, and he’s giving away in this legislation a core Fourth Amendment protection by basically saying that the FISA court has permission to bless the entire program, which will abandon, as best I can tell, the requirement of individualized warrants.”

(h/t Mike)

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team