Read time: 2 minutes

Arizona State Rep. Refuses To Answer Why She Voted For 'Birther Bill'

Arizona Rep. Michele Reagan, who is running to be Secretary of State, got tied up in knots when asked why she voted for the wingnut "birther Bill" that embarrassed her home state.
Views:

Arizona State Rep. Michele Reagan, who is now running to be Secretary of State got tied up in knots after she was asked why she voted for the wingnut "Birther Bill." Reagan refused to answer the questions and kept repeating that their state laws are what need to be followed now. When the interview kept the pressure up and admonished her for voting for a bill that embarrassed the entire state, Reagan stumbled again and then kept to her rehearsed answers. It was not a pretty moment for her, nor should it be. I do hope supporting psychos that pushed for the birther bill has consequences.

Raw Story

In and interview with 12 News, the Republican candidate for Arizona Secretary of State deflected questions about why she supported a so-called “birther bill” when she was in the state legislature. “In 2011,” the interviewer asked, “you voted for the ‘birther bill,’ which required [presidential] candidates to prove their citizenship to the secretary of state of Arizona — would the presidential candidates in 2016 have to prove their citizenship to you?”

After an uncomfortably long pause, Reagan replied, “I just think we need to follow the state laws, and the state laws are pretty clear and, um, what is required in state law is what needs to be followed. As secretary of state, the laws are very clear.”

Why vote this way though?” the interviewer interrupted. “Do you believe president Obama needed to show his birth certificate to the secretary of state?” “I believe,” she replied, “that what is in state law is sufficient.” “Then why vote for that bill? It was an embarrassment to our state,” he said. “Do you recognize that?” “I realize that what’s in state law right now is sufficient,” she replied.

“Do you regret that vote?” he asked.

“There are certain things that, uh, I think that, uh, state law is sufficient, and we don’t need to revisit that or go back and change that,” she replied.

Haven't we had enough Katherine Harris' for one lifetime? I sure hope Arizonans hold her accountable for a vote that embarrassed their entire state.

Here's the video of the interview here.

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team