June 22, 2015

It truly is a crazy world when satirical news has more impact than the allegedly "real" thing, but hey, I'll take it:

WASHINGTON – The Department of Agriculture may be able to protect chicken farmers from industry retaliations in 2016, and satirical news anchor John Olivermay be part of the reason.

A draft of the 2016 Agriculture Appropriations Bill was unanimously approved by aHouse subcommittee Thursday.

It passed without any amendments that might prohibit the U.S. Department of Agriculture from punishing meatpacking companies if they use deceptive practices against contract livestock and poultry farmers.

Part of the credit goes to the host of HBO’s “Last Week Tonight with John Oliver,” some members of Congress said.

On his show last month, the comedian criticized contracts that poultry producers, including Tyson Foods, Sanderson Farms, and Perdue, have their chicken farmers sign.

“Jangly guitars make anything sound more plausible,” Oliver said of Tyson promotional video designed to encourage people to go into chicken farming. “Typically, farmers go into a great deal of debt just to build chicken houses and go into the business.”

These contract farms take out loans to build facilities, buy equipment and chicken feed – usually from the meat processing companies. The farmers are paid to raise the chickens, but they don’t get to sell them. The company owns the animals. Some farmers say they don’t make enough money in this system, but are usually in so much debt they can’t leave it.The companies also force farmers to compete with each other. Lower-performing farms get less money.

Journalist Christopher Leonard wrote about this in 2014 and 2015. He described it as a “system that keeps farmers in a state of indebted servitude.”

When farmers attempted to speak out about their conditions, they suffered retaliation from chicken companies. Sometimes it was in the form of getting lower quality chickens to raise. When animals die, farmers are forced to pay.

Attempts to reach the National Chicken Council by phone were unsuccessful, but the council responded to Oliver’s segment by saying it “presents a completely one-sided view of U.S. poultry production and is not an accurate reflection of the overwhelming majority of the 25,000 farm families who partner with chicken companies.”

But Oliver also took a jab at members of Congress, who he said, have “fought efforts to protect chicken farmers” by adding riders to appropriations bills.

He told viewers that anyone on the House Appropriations Committee who votes against an amendment giving USDA power to protect farmers was a “chicken f—–.”

Oliver said this while flashing images of each of the committee members with their states and party affiliations.

Can you help us out?

For 18 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.