Read time: 2 minutes

Fox 'News' Michelle Fields: Eliminate Social Security Completely

Tell this to the people who rely heavily on the important program that lifted Seniors out of poverty.
Views:

Michelle Fields gained notoriety by offending Matt Damon and mostly all educators in this interview. So of course, Fox 'News' scooped her up for her wisdom and insight. Why not ask this genius what she thinks about Social Security? After the crazy talk during Thursday night's Fox News GOP Debate, the Cashin' In crew decided to tackle the nontroversy. But one emerged as the craziest of the crazy.

MICHELLE FIELDS:

'I think we should completely eliminate Social Security. I think it's unfair to young people, they're taking money from young people who are poor, who could invest and buy a home, and giving it to a lot of people who don't actually need Social Security...We shouldn't simply give money to people because they are old.'

Apparently, Michelle doesn't fully understand the concept of Social Security. She doesn't care that many people rely heavily for subsistence on the solvent and popular government program, but the fact remains that the people who are drawing on the funds have put the money in themselves! Here's the government breakdown of who needs and uses Social Security:

Among elderly Social Security beneficiaries, 52% of married couples and 74% of unmarried persons receive 50% or more of their income from Social Security. Among elderly Social Security beneficiaries, 22% of married couples and about 47% of unmarried persons rely on Social Security for 90% or more of their income.

She said liberals talk about this issue of fairness, but she claims that she's talking about fairness to young people. She thinks that she's not going to get this money ever, and Juan Williams reminded her,

'you'll get old too sweetheart.'

She disagrees, believing that she's never going to see that money, because freedom. Rodgers, Hoenig and even the 'Democrat' came to her aid.

Wayne Rogers went on about the mythical flat tax which has been shown to benefit the wealthy and agreed with Jonathan Hoenig that people should be able to opt out of the SS program.

'Democrat,' Jessica Tarlov feebly defended SS, but believes too that people should be given the option of opting out, as if this will solve the mythical problem of insolvency.

The only problem with all this fear-mongering: it's based on a lie. We know that SS is solvent until 2033 but the GOP enjoys this fear-mongering, especially their older demographic.

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team