March 3, 2016

Silly Chuck Grassley thinks the "next" President should appoint the vacancy on the Supreme Court? That's funny, in the past he's demanded an "up-or-down" vote on SCOTUS at least 27 times!

CAP Action made the video above:

Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has vowed not to hold committee hearings or vote for whomever President Obama nominates to the Supreme Court. He insists that the next president should fill the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

But Grassley hasn’t always felt this way. Throughout his 35 year career in the Senate, Grassley has passionately insisted that senators have a constitutional obligation to “advise and consent” on a presidential nominee through an up-or-down vote.

CAP Action provides twenty-seven examples. C'mon Senator Chuck, nobody's buying your objections. Up or down vote!

Help Us Fight Back Against Social Media Censorship

Facebook has been limiting the visibility of our posts after a serious of bogus violations. We need your help now more than ever.

Discussion

We are currently migrating to Disqus

On May 14, 2022, we started migrating our comments from Insticator back to Disqus. During this transition period, some posts will have Insticator and some Disqus. For more information on the transition, as well as information regarding old C&L accounts, please see this post.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.