Read time: 1 minute

Coretta Scott King Would Still Oppose Jeff Sessions As AG

Her letter and testimony from 1986 present a man with a clear history of racist behavior.
Coretta Scott King Would Still Oppose Jeff Sessions As AG

No matter how Sessions tries to spin it, he's still a little too cozy with racism to be the nation's Attorney General.

Yesterday's Senate testimony revealed how Jefferson Beauregard Sessions fared during his last Senate hearing for a Federal Judge position in 1986. We can thank the no holds barred interrogation of Senator Al Franken (D-MN) for exposing these inconsistencies yesterday.

The bombshell letter and Senate testimony from that year by Coretta Scott King, a civil rights leader and widow of Martin Luther King makes it clear that what successfully disqualified Sessions then, disqualifies him now.

Image from: Washington Post

Read the full letter and testimony right here.

It's entirely fitting that Coretta Scott King, who passed in 2006, speak from the grave against this nomination. We still need her voice.

And it's telling that (1) we now know who buried her letter, thanks to Wesley Lowery of the Washington Post:

Buzzfeed News first reported the existence of the letter earlier Tuesday, noting that it was never entered into the congressional record by then-Judiciary Committee Chairman Strom Thurmond.

And we also know that (2) Judicial Watch will happily pull out anti-Semitism to prove Sessions is "not a racist." Yeah.

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.