Read time: 2 minutes

Psychology Today Publishes Apology For "Why Are Black Women Less Attractive?" Article

Well, it took a whole lot of outraged blog postings, letters to the editor and way too much time, but the Managing Editor of Psychology Today has finally apologized for allowing Satoshi Kanazawa's pseudo-scientific treatise "Why Are Black Women

kanazawa.png

Well, it took a whole lot of outraged blog postings, letters to the editor and way too much time, but the Managing Editor of Psychology Today has finally apologized for allowing Satoshi Kanazawa's pseudo-scientific treatise "Why Are Black Women Less Attractive?" Personally, I think this should have gone up that day.

After some attempted editing of the title, the magazine retracted the post from its website in its entirety. Kanazawa in turn is facing an investigation by the London School of Economics, where he is a professor, after a unanimous vote for his dismissal by the student union.

Contributing writers to Psychology Today moved quickly to do some damage control. [..]However, many were still waiting for a direct response from the magazine, who, according to Stanton, "is probably the most popular PT blogger." Considering the level of outrage, the apology was some time coming. Kaja Perina, the Editor-in-Chief, issued the following statement on Friday:

Last week, a blog post about race and appearance by Satoshi Kanazawa was published--and promptly removed--from this site. We deeply apologize for the pain and offense that this post caused. Psychology Today's mission is to inform the public, not to provide a platform for inflammatory and offensive material. Psychology Today does not tolerate racism or prejudice of any sort. The post was not approved by Psychology Today, but we take full responsibility for its publication on our site. We have taken measures to ensure that such an incident does not occur again. Again, we are deeply sorry for the hurt that this post caused.

However, there was no word on whether the magazine will continue to publish articles by Kanazawa. He has not published on entry on his blog since the one removed, although there is no indication that the blog will be terminated.

It's good to hear that other organizations are seeking to distance themselves from the kind of work that Kanazawa produces. Again, it's a little late in coming, seeing that he's already written such inflammatory and pseudo-scientific tripe as

Are All Women Essentially Prostitutes?;
If Liberals Are More Intelligent than Conservatives, Why Are Liberals So Stupid?; and
Why Is It Permissible to Profile Packages But Not Passengers?.

To be clear, I'm not advocating censoring Kanazawa. He is free to say and believe whatever his racist, misogynistic and pseudo-intellectual heart believes. He's just not guaranteed a platform nor lent any credibility to do so.

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team