Read time: 2 minutes

Rep. Swalwell: If Trump Hands McFaul To Putin, It's 'Absolutely' Grounds For Removal

The congressman did not mince words: Trump will suffer the consequences.
Views:

CNN's Erin Burnett had Rep. Eric Swalwell as a guest last night, and asked him about the push to have the interpreter report to the House Intelligence committee about the private meeting between Trump and Putin.

"You mentioned the ambassador, former U.S. ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul. Putin suggested that, in that conference, right, he said interesting idea, that Russians would get to question some Americans that they really don't like, Bill Browder and, as you pointed out, Ambassador McFaul," she said.

"Russians are the suspect in this attack, with a lot of good evidence," Swalwell said.

"There's no reason we would open up our evidence files, send our investigators over there to let them review that. That would be like a victim allowing the burglar to set up the home security system. That's ridiculous. And also again this is just what about-ism by Vladimir Putin to try to turn the tables and make this good deal maker of a president believe he has gotten a good deal out of this.

"Republicans in Congress need to stand firm that we absolutely will not tolerate the president even considering turning over a U.S. ambassador. If he were to do that, I think that would absolutely be grounds for removal from office."

Burnett noted that Heather Nauert, the State Department spokesperson, said the idea was "completely absurd and that it wasn't even on the table. Right? The opposite of what Sarah Sanders was saying. There appears to be a dispute, even within this administration.

She then addressed the idea that the meeting translator should testify. "Would you set an incredibly dangerous precedent by forcing this woman, Marina Gross, by saying what happened?"

Swalwell responded that Trump was the one who set precedent by having a private meeting with Putin. "The president in that meeting has offered or suggested that he would allow that leader who attacked us to interview in Russia a U.S. ambassador. So I'm also, again, concerned that the president may have divulged national security information. I want to know if our national security professionals are now further at risk because of what the president told Vladimir Putin."

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team