Read time: 7 minutes

GOP Leader McCarthy Refuses To Accept Whistle-Blower's Offer Of Written Testimony For Republicans

GOP House Minority Leader first claimed he hadn't heard about it, and then rejected the offer from the whistle-blower's attorney for written testimony, under oath, directly from Republicans during an interview on this Sunday's Face the Nation.
Views:

GOP House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy first claimed he hadn't heard about it, and then rejected an offer from the whistle-blower's attorney for written testimony, under oath, directly from Republicans during an interview on this Sunday's Face the Nation.

After first explaining to host Margaret Brennan when asked what witnesses they'd like to call if allowed that they really just want to turn the hearings into a circus by calling for Chairman Schiff to testify, McCarthy was asked about the offer made by the whistle-blower's attorney to ranking member Nunes.

McCarthy made it clear that they're a lot more interested in outing the whistle-blower than they are about getting any answers to questions they may have for them.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, Republicans will be able to ask questions of witnesses and call their own. Who is it in the public hearings that--

REP. MCCARTHY: No--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --Republicans want to hear from?

REP. MCCARTHY: Well, Margaret, that's not true. If you- if you read what the resolution says, now Adam Schiff controls the time and now they've written it, where only--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Democrats are--

REP. MCCARTHY: a Republican, Devin--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --in the majority. That is the way being in the majority works. Isn't that what you would do?

REP. MCCARTHY: No, that is not what I would do. That is not what we did when we moved for impeachment with Clinton. That's not what Democrats did when they moved with impeachment for Nixon. They actually had witnesses. But what Adam Schiff now has the power to do is tell Devin Nunes, the ranking member, that he cannot have any other member on that committee have time to ask questions. In every committee today, it doesn't matter what the issue is, you can yield your time to another individual, but not now. They want total control. Will the public be able to see what's inside these four new secret depositions in the basement? No. 75 percent. Three quarters--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

REP. MCCARTHY: --of the entire Congress cannot be included.


↓ Story continues below ↓

MARGARET BRENNAN: So who is it--

REP. MCCARTHY: Is that openness?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Who is it that you want to see? That was the question I asked.

REP. MCCARTHY: Well- well, I think the very first person we should bring, Adam Schiff and his staff. He is the only individual in America, in Congress--

MARGARET BRENNAN: For a public hearing?

REP. MCCARTHY: --who knows--

MARGARET BRENNAN: You want to question--

REP. MCCARTHY: Well if he- if he--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --Chairman of the House intelligence committee?

REP. MCCARTHY: Yes, I would. Because he is the only person who knows who this whistleblower is. He refers to himself as a Ken Starr, Ken Starr testified. How many times did he meet with the whistleblower? What did he talk to the whistleblower about? Because when the whistleblower even went to the inspector general he never mentioned that he went with Adam Schiff. Remember what we're talking about today Margaret, the removal of the president of the United States. This should not be taken lightly. We should have all the facts. The public deserves the facts not something that's leaked. We're three weeks since the very first--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Right

REP. MCCARTHY: --hearing inside there, the deposition. We still do not have the transcripts. You have members of Congress who just voted--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

REP. MCCARTHY: --to justify what has already happened without ever reading one word of what's gone on--

MARGARET BRENNAN: For the record--

REP. MCCARTHY: --that is what is wrong--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --for the record--

REP. MCCARTHY: --we need accountability.

MARGARET BRENNAN: For the record the attorney for the whistleblower says he- he has- has his client has not met with Adam Schiff. A member of the committee did talk to the whistleblower about procedural matters. But I spoke to the whistleblower's attorney just last night, Mark Zaid, and he told me that an offer has been made, and this is new, to Republicans to answer questions directly put to the whistleblower by Republicans not going through the Democratic controlled committee, but to answer them in writing under oath, under penalty of perjury. What is your response to that offer?

REP. MCCARTHY: Well MARGARET I have never received that offer and I'm the lead Republican--

MARGARET BRENNAN: It was submitted to Devin--

REP. MCCARTHY: --in the House, but this is what I'm--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --Nunes, who is the ranking member on House Intelligence.

REP. MCCARTHY: Well, when was it submitted to him because Devin had--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Last night.

REP. MCCARTHY: --not told me about that prior to today. Well, Devin's in California so let's see how they submitted. But first of all, we were talking about the removal of the president of United States. Just as the speaker of the House said in March, it has to be so compelling--

MARGARET BRENNAN: But--

REP. MCCARTHY: --so overwhelming and bipartisan. I think if the whistleblower should come forward in an open hearing and also bring the six people that he talks about inside his complaint that he said talked about other issues as well.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So--

REP. MCCARTHY: Now we have the transcript--

MARGARET BRENNAN: So, would you as leader--

REP. MCCARTHY: --so we have more knowledge than the whistleblower.

MARGARET BRENNAN: As- as leader--

REP. MCCARTHY: Yes.

MARGARET BRENNAN: --though are you just completely turning down the opportunity to submit questions--

REP MCCARTHY: No.

MARGARET BRENNAN: --in writing?

REP. MCCARTHY: I would like that--

MARGARET BRENNAN: For you that is not sufficient?

REP. MCCARTHY: No. As an American and that everybody should know and have accountability, you're talking about the removal of the presidency. We watched Adam Schiff lie to the American public that he did not know who the whistleblower was--

MARGARET BRENNAN: So- so, you are open--

REP. MCCARTHY: We watched that the whistleblower--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --open to it? I'm--

REP. MCCARTHY: --did not even check.

MARGARET BRENNAN: --just not clear on that. Are- are you--

REP. MCCARTHY: Well, what- what I'm- what I--

MARGARET BRENNAN: Even to the first--

REP. MCCARTHY: Let me be--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --offer of- of answering questions through writing, but then if Republicans submit their own questions directly, are you open to that? Because it would bypass Adam Schiff.

REP. MCCARTHY: No, let me be very clear Margaret. What I'm open to, when you're talking about the removal of the president of the United States, undoing democracy, undoing what the American public had voted for, I think that individual should come before the committee. He could come down to the basement. But he needs to answer the questions. We need an openness that people understand this. Remember what you're asking. You're going to change the course, the very fabric of democracy today, based upon someone wrote a written question of somebody that wasn't even on the phone call, that had hearsay? Even though we all know what the transcripts said?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well Mike Pence would become president--

REP. MCCARTHY: Are we really this far that we--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --It wouldn't undo the election results. If the president were removed--

REP. MCCARTHY: Margaret, you--Margaret--

MARGARET BRENNAN: --Mike Pence would become president.

REP. MCCARTHY: Margaret you're- Margaret you- Margaret you're really saying today on national television, that somebody who was not on a phone call that you had the transcripts of the phone call, 'no big deal' just remove the President of the United States over a phone call?

MARGARET BRENNAN: No, I'm just saying that it wouldn't undo the election--

REP. MCCARTHY: That is the difference of what I fundamentally believe.

They don't want answers. They're not interested in the rule of law. They don't care about the sanctity of our elections. They don't care if the president is committing crimes in office. They only want to put the whistle-blower in harm's way.

More C&L Coverage

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.