Republican candidates endured a miserable turnout and a split electorate on Super Tuesday. But in Ohio, President Obama beat them all. Yes, that's right. President Obama got more votes last night than Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum. Ari Berman at
March 7, 2012

Republican candidates endured a miserable turnout and a split electorate on Super Tuesday. But in Ohio, President Obama beat them all.

Yes, that's right. President Obama got more votes last night than Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum. Ari Berman at The Nation has the story:

Lost amid the post–Super Tuesday analysis is the fact that Barack Obama actually got more votes than Mitt Romney in the crucial battleground state of Ohio last night, 547,588 to 456,205, according to the Ohio secretary of state.

That statistic is largely symbolic, but it is indicative of Romney’s weaknesses as a candidate (and Obama’srebounding strength), which has become magnified as the GOP primary goes on. Self-identified Republicans made up 69 percent of GOP primary voters in Ohio, but only 65 percent of GOP primary voters said they would “definitely” vote for the GOP nominee in November.

The real story of the GOP primary—and Super Tuesday—is not that Romney won't be the GOP nominee (he will be, eventually), but how bruised he will be entering the general election. The polling on Romney over the past week has been dreadful for the Republican frontrunner.In the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, Obama leads Romney by six points (50-44) among all voters, seven points among independents (46-39) and eighteen points among women (55-37). Last year Romney led Obama among working-class white voters by 14 points (52-38); now that lead is down to five. Notes Ron Brownstein: “By comparison, in 2008 non-college white voters backed John McCain over Obama by a resounding 58 percent to 40 percent; Republicans won even more of them (63 percent) in the 2010 Congressional election…. No Democratic presidential nominee since 1988 has carried more than 44 percent of non-college white voters.” Romney’s blue-collar problem is one of many he’ll face entering a general election.

According to Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, Obama leads Romney by twenty-five points (65-30) among unmarried women—a crucial segment of the Democratic base that dropped off in 2010. And he leads Romney by a staggering fifty-six points among Latino voters (70-14), a twenty-point improvement for Obama over John McCain in 2008. If these numbers hold, Obama will defeat Romney in every Western swing state and almost certainly win re-election.

I doubt those numbers will hold. Things will almost certainly tighten. But what this primary has done to Mitt Romney will haunt him in the general election, because he will not be able to walk back to the center from the right. His comments on immigration, women, health care, and gay rights will do much harm to him with groups he will need to win. That's why the Latino and single women statistics are staggering.

My question is who Romney will pull in as a running mate to attract the ultra-conservative Republicans, and whether they will be as irresponsible or galvanizing as Sarah Palin was to the McCain campaign in 2008.

The clown car parade continues.

Can you help us out?

For nearly 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon