John Hinderaker appeared on "Reliable Sources," Sunday and gave a clinic in the art of being a Bush apologist. [media id=14958]-WMP Video-QT (I've
March 13, 2006

John Hinderaker appeared on "Reliable Sources," Sunday and gave a clinic in the art of being a Bush apologist.
icon Download -WMP Video-QT (I've edited out everyone else)

KURTZ: OK. Let's move -let's move beyond the legal justification. You think the public doesn't have a right to know because classified information is involved that the CIA is maintaining secret presence in Eastern Europe, that the Bush administration is conducting wiretaps in this country without -- without warrants? You would be just as happy if reporters could not publish that kind of information?

HINDERAKER: Oh, absolutely. There's all kinds of information that you can't give to the American public without also giving it to the terrorists. That's what "The New York Times" did, and as a result our security has been compromised.

The NSA program was capturing lots of international terrorist communications. That's dropped off drastically since "The New York Times" published the story. So they've -- they've damaged our security.

As Tbogg says: "Secret prisons in Europe? Somehow that damages our security. Warrantless wiretaps? Ditto. Those issues don't involve the so-called War On Terror™. They involve the exposing the private face of an administration that is drunk with power. That's a whole different war.

There is nothing that John Hinderaker won't defend."

Can you help us out?

For 18 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We are currently migrating to Disqus

On May 14, 2022, we started migrating our comments from Insticator back to Disqus. During this transition period, some posts will have Insticator and some Disqus. For more information on the transition, as well as information regarding old C&L accounts, please see this post.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.