Read time: 2 minutes

Sen. King Went Into Haspel Hearing Concerned 'And Came Out Opposed'

"I don't think that she was forthcoming in her answers," King said of the CIA nominee.
Views:

Sen. Angus King was not reassured by Gina Haspel's response to questions yesterday about the CIA's use of waterboarding.

FEINSTEIN: In November and December of 2002, did you oversee the enhanced interrogation of Al Nashiri which included the use of the waterboard? Yes or no.

HASPEL: Senator, anything about my classified assignment history throughout my 33 years, we can talk about in this afternoon's classified session. Exposing operational information can be damaging to sources and methods, as you know.

KING: Who's deciding what's classified and isn't in terms of what's released to this committee?

HASPEL: Senator, we are following the existing guidelines.

KING: Who's deciding?

HASPEL: We are following the existing guidelines -- I have chosen to follow the guidelines.

KING: So you are making the classification decisions about what materials should be released to this committee?

HASPEL: I am electing not to make an exception for myself.

David Ignatius asked Sen. King what Haspel would have to do or say to get his support.

"I made a decision, I went into those hearings yesterday morning concerned and came out opposed. I think she had ample opportunity, we had about six hours of hearings yesterday, I've met with her privately for probably about an hour. And I think the exchanges that you saw were indicative of one of the red flags that went up for me during the hearing," King said.

"I don't think that she was forthcoming in her answers. She was very careful -- almost lawyerly, although she kept saying she's not a lawyer, but you had to sort of pry the information out of her. I had to ask her three times who is making the classification decision. It was her. So she is deciding what of her record should be released. and we've gotten some good news things about meetings with Mother Teresa and those kind of things, but there are other things that haven't been released.

"So I wasn't satisfied with her answers. I don't think that she was fully forthcoming. and my focus was on the destruction of the tapes. That is where there is a lot of argument to be had about the torture program and whether it was legal and authorized. But in 2005 when that decision was made to destroy the tapes, she was part of that process."

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $21 for 2021? Please consider a one-time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team