Read time: 2 minutes

Twitter Can't Ban White Supremacists Without Banning Republicans Too

At an all-hands meeting, Twitter explained that they can ban ISIS, but not neo-nazis and white supremacists without also catching Republicans in the net.

As if we needed further confirmation that (a) Twitter is racist, and (b) Republican politicians are white supremacists, along comes an investigation by Motherboard that ties that all up neatly with a bow.

Twitter users have cried, screamed, begged Jack Dorsey to ban neo-nazis and white supremacists from Twitter for years. After all, the platform has virtually eliminated any trace of ISIS from its site. It used AI (artificial intelligence) to sweep its site of any and all ISIS content. Why can it not do the same for white supremacists? Well, kids, here's your answer:

In separate discussions verified by Motherboard, that employee said Twitter hasn’t taken the same aggressive approach to white supremacist content because the collateral accounts that are impacted can, in some instances, be Republican politicians.

The employee argued that, on a technical level, content from Republican politicians could get swept up by algorithms aggressively removing white supremacist material. Banning politicians wouldn’t be accepted by society as a trade-off for flagging all of the white supremacist propaganda, he argued.

That should tell us all something about Republican politicians. other words, if Twitter content filter bots swept the sites eliminating the accounts of white supremacists, and the accounts who retweet that content, some Republican politicians would find that they have their own accounts shut down.

Take our dear leader, for example. The Orange Twatwaffle-In-Chief just yesterday hauled Jack Dorsey into a closed-door Oval Office meeting to complain that Twitter was being mean to him by taking away some of his followers, and he retweets white supremacists from time to time.

Is the lesson here that AI is not the be-all and end-all of monitoring hate speech on social media platforms, like Ben Collins is arguing on Velshi & Ruhle? Well, yes, we do need actual people to help deal with problems that occur with the product. After all, humans are the ones the platform is designed to serve.

But truly, the biggest lesson is the one we already knew, and Twitterbots are proving it. The line between Republican politicians and white supremacists is virtually non-existent.

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $21 for 2021? Please consider a one-time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage


New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team