The FBI violated the constitutional right to due process of Muslim Americans by placing them on the list that restricted their movement and subjected them to abuse.
Federal Judge Slams FBI Terror Watch List As Unconstitutional
September 6, 2019

U.S. District Judge Anthony J. Trenga ruled against the FBI, and in favor of 23 Muslim U.S. citizens who were unfairly placed on the FBI's terror watch list. The decision renders the watch list unconstitutional. Judge Trenga determined that they'd been placed on the list without any evidence they were "known terrorists," and that their due process was violated. According to The Washington Post,

Trenga noted that the list restricts their ability to fly and engage in everyday activities and backed the plaintiffs’ concerns that they were flagged secretly and without a clear methodology.

“There is no evidence, or contention, that any of these plaintiffs satisfy the definition of a ‘known terrorist,’ ” wrote Trenga, adding that even harmless conduct could result in someone being labeled as a “suspected terrorist” on the watch list.

“An individual’s placement into the [watch list] does not require any evidence that the person engaged in criminal activity, committed a crime, or will commit a crime in the future,” the judge wrote, “and individuals who have been acquitted of a terrorism-related crime may still be listed.”

The database includes over one million people, 4,600 of them U.S. citizens. In this case, defendants' abilities to travel were severely hampered, and they were subjected to discrimination and abuse. One of the plaintiffs, Anas Elhady, was detained for over 10 hours when returning to the U.S. from Canada, and in that time, he needed emergency medical attention.

Plaintiffs also argued that not only were innocent people placed on the list with no evidence, but people who have committed terrorist acts have never been included on the list, or were once included but mistakenly taken off the list because they were determined to no longer be a threat.

The ruling could reshape the government’s process for a watch list that has long been criticized for inaccuracy and described by opponents as “a Muslim registry created in the wake of the widespread Islamophobia of the early 2000s.”
[...]
“Innocent people should be beyond the reach of the watchlist system,” Gadeir Abbas, a CAIR attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. “We think that’s what the Constitution requires.”

Another day in which we can point to the only branch of government that has a shred of operating integrity left. For the moment.

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. When registering you will also be presented with the option to tie all your old Disqus comments to your new Insticator account. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.