In Kansas, Anti-Choice Forces Are Lying And Lying To Win
Credit: Getty Images
August 2, 2022

Why are we not surprised that some anonymous anti-choice group sent out a confusing text to voters in Kansas to get them to vote “yes” on a measure that, if passed, would rewrite the Kansas state constitution to make abortion illegal? This comes as Kansans face one of the most important votes in the nation today—the first reproductive rights vote since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June.

The text read: “Women in KS are losing their choice on reproductive rights. Voting YES on the amendment will give women a choice. Vote YES to protect women’s health.”

According to The Kansas City Star, the message was sent out across the state, presumably to thousands of voters.

Currently, abortion is legal in Kansas up to 22 weeks’ gestation—one of the only states in the region where that is still the case. In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled that bodily autonomy extended to abortion rights.

According to the ballot’s language, a “yes” vote on the Value Them Both amendment would mean:

“Regulation of abortion. Because Kansans value both women and children, the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion. To the extent permitted by the constitution of the United States, the people, through their elected state representatives and state senators, may pass laws regarding abortion, including, but not limited to, laws that account for circumstances of pregnancy resulting from rape or incest, or circumstances of necessity to save the life of the mother.” 

And despite what many Kansas lawmakers have said, a “yes” vote would ban abortion.

On the other hand, a “no” vote would protect a pregnant person’s right to an abortion, and the state’s current constitution would not change—keeping abortion legal in the state, despite the fall of Roe.

One voter to receive the misleading text was former Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius. In a statement sent to the Star on Monday, Sebelius said:

“This misleading text shouldn’t surprise anyone. The anti-choice movement has been lying to the voters of Kansas for decades. … This act of desperation won’t stop the voters of Kansas from protecting their constitutional rights and freedom by voting NO tomorrow.”

The Star reports that none of the state’s significant anti-abortion groups have admitted to sending the text. President of Operation Rescue, Troy Newman, alleged that “There’s a lot of people trying to confuse people on both sides, I guess.”

Historically, controversial ballot measures have been written to confuse. Remember California Proposition 8? Informally known as Prop 8, the bill was intended to ban same-sex marriage. But it was written so that a “yes” vote supported marriage solely between a man and a woman, while a “no” vote opposed the amendment that would define marriage as one man and one woman. So voting “yes” appeared to the casual follower of news to mean “yes, I support same-sex marriage.” A “Vote NO on H8” campaign had to be pushed to clarify the misleading language for voters who wanted marriage equality in the state. 

As for the Kansas vote today, the misleading text messages do not violate the state’s campaign laws, but they do baffle voters.

Cindy Novelo, 64, called the texts “shameful,” and she reported to her local election office and the American Civil Liberties Union. “It was so clear. It was very clear, and people are looking for clarity. That it was so clear and completely false was just over the top,” she told The Star.

Republished with permission from Daily Kos.

Can you help us out?

For nearly 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.