Read time: 2 minutes

NC Warns Court About 'Womanless' Marriages To Defend Gov. McCrory's Ban On NAACP Protests

A Superior Court judge in Raleigh on Monday gave the NAACP permission to rally at the State Capital building to protest the Republican-controlled legislature after Gov. Pat McCrory's (R) administration refused to approve a permit for the group.
6 years ago by David
Views:

A Superior Court judge in Raleigh on Monday gave the NAACP permission to rally at the State Capital building to protest the Republican-controlled legislature after Gov. Pat McCrory's (R) administration refused to approve a permit for the group.

NAACP attorney Scott Holmes told Judge Allen Baddour that the state's action's were unconstitutional because the state had claimed that the permit had been denied because the event would have more than 100 people. But hundreds of people attended a Christmas tree lighting ceremony with Gov. McCrory in the same area earlier this month.

"What's really going on here is that the state has preferred speech and non-preferred speech," Holmes explained. "They prefer government speech over the people's speech. And that's unconstitutional."

Special Deputy Attorney General Don Teeter, however, insisted that "the Department of Administration and its directors do not care what speech is rendered by an applicant. We don't even ask for it."

Baddour pointed out to Teeter that the applicant was required to "provide goals, objectives and purpose" on the permit application.

"You just told me you didn't care and you didn't ask," Baddour said.

"We want to know what they're going to do there," Teeter replied. "Are they going to roast a goat? Are they going to have a womanless wedding? Are they going to have a prayer vigil? Are they going to have a rally? That's the kind of thing we want to know. We don't care what they say while they do it."

"I reject the argument that we are limiting speech at all," he later added. "These folks have been permitted to go to an appropriate area to speak to their hearts' content."

But Baddour ruled that he had no choice but to grant a temporary restraining order, blocking the Department of Administration's decision not to approve the permit.

The judge said that he suspected that the administration's ban on the NAACP was "either discretionary or content based."

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.