Read time: 3 minutes

NYC To Pay $583K Settlement In Occupy Wall Street Suit

A senior NYPD official who was present during the arrests was unable to point out in videos of the event a single moment when any of the defendants committed any act of disorderly conduct.

Via Gothamist, news of a large settlement with Occupy Wall Street:

During Occupy Wall Street’s heyday in 2011 and 2012, the NYPD made them pay, again and againand again, for exercising their right to assembly and free speech. Nearly three years later, New York City taxpayers are still paying for the NYPD's approach to policing lawful protest. Today, lawyers announced the largest settlement with New York City yet, with the city paying out $583,024 to 14 protesters who were arrested for disorderly conduct on January 1st of 2012.

Sources familiar with today’s settlement said that that the case was ready to go to trial beforeJudge Shira Scheindlin until a few months ago, when, while being deposed for the trial, a senior NYPD official who was present during the arrests was unable to point out in videos of the event a single moment when any of the defendants committed any act of disorderly conduct.

According to the protesters' complaint, the demonstrators were part of a march passing through the East Village that night when police ordered them to disperse.

“This was a constitutionally unlawful order,” said Wylie Stecklow, a lawyer for the protesters, at a press conference at City Hall today. “The march was not yet blocking the sidewalk, and just minutes before this unlawful dispersal order, the police had ordered the marchers to keep walking.”

Apparently not content with denying a group of citizens their right to assemble, the police then decided to kettle them for good measure, surrounding them on 13th Street, preventing them from leaving, all the while ordering them to disperse. Finally, the plaintiffs were arrested, charged with disorderly conduct, thrown into police wagons, and held at the precinct for five hours before being released with desk appearance tickets.

By the time their cases made it to prosecutors, the D.A.’s office didn’t think there were grounds to prosecute, so the charges were dropped. No harm done!

Two of the defendants who settled at an earlier stage will receive $5,000 from the city. The remaining 12 will receive $20,002. The protesters' lawyers will receive $333,000 in costs and fees.

Today’s settlement comes on top of the $82,500 paid to a protester to settle a suit alleging he was beat up by cops, the $350,000 paid over the city’s trashing of media equipment and Occupy’s library during the eviction from Zuccotti Park, and the $50,000 paid to three people apparently arrested because police thought they might have been thinking of attending a protest later.

The lawsuit over Anthony Bologna’s pepper-spraying of kettled young women hasn’t even been settled yet. (For an even more comprehensive and dismaying look at how the NYPD handled the Occupy Wall Street protests, take a look at this report released by law schools at NYU and Fordham.)

The Occupy payouts are still dwarfed by the $18 million payout the City made to the thousands arrested during the 2004 RNC.

David Thompson, the lead lawyer for the protesters, said the settlement is clear evidence that the NYPD needs to change how it treats political protesters.

Have you subscribed yet?

Banish those ads for good with a subscription to the site. For $1 for the first month and $4.99 after that, we'll pull all the ads off (except those from 3rd party apps) so you can enjoy the site without all the annoying popups and autoplay ads.

If you've already subscribed, consider a one-time or donation of whatever amount you can spare. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.