Read time: 1 minute

Senate Votes To Open Debate On Constitutional Amendment To Reverse Citizens United

The debate will certainly give everyone an opportunity to defend or attack Citizens United, but at what cost?

"The Supreme Court is helping [corporations] buy elections." - Sen. Elizabeth Warren

On Tuesday, the Senate voted 79-18 to open debate on a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United.

Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats gave passionate speeches, but as Al Franken explains below, the cloture vote passed for pretty cynical reasons. He doesn't have much hope for actually passing the bill, but he believes Republicans allowed the debate to go forward to avoid votes on other issues, like minimum wage, jobs, infrastructure, and more.

As Franken notes, millions of undisclosed dollars are going into political campaigns, despite the majority of Americans who object to the way Citizens United has corrupted politics.

A constitutional amendment requires a 2/3rds vote by the Senate and ratification by 2/3rds of the states.

Since we have a House that isn't doing anything anyway, this is probably a good time for a debate on campaign finance. If nothing else, it should give Americans a really clear idea of who is and is not behind having billionaires buy their office for them.

[h/t MountainMan23 for Warren video]


Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.