Read time: 2 minutes

Bill Kristol's Weekly Standard Already Plotting SCOTUS Appointments

They're going to be so sad when they don't get that privilege.
Bill Kristol's Weekly Standard Already Plotting SCOTUS Appointments

Nothing like counting your SCOTUS appointments before they're hatched. Why, it's almost like Republicans are planning to stuff the ballot box or something.

There's a nice long fat article over at Bill Kristol's The Weekly Standard about what Republicans should plan on for their next SCOTUS nominees. As if they think they already have the 2016 election in the bag or something!

When Chief Justice John Roberts administers the oath of office to the next president, he will be flanked by three, and almost four, octogenarians: Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg (83), Antonin Scalia (80), Anthony Kennedy (80), and Stephen Breyer (77). The next president will likely have the opportunity to appoint a replacement for one, two, three, or maybe even four of those justices. These decisions will reshape the Court and how it reads the Constitution for decades to come. Republican presidential candidates will likely pledge to appoint “constitutional conservatives” to the bench—which ought to mean judges who will be constrained by its original meaning. However, GOP presidents have filled 12 out of 18 Supreme Court vacancies over the past half-century, with disappointing results. This track record teaches five important lessons that should guide future nominations.

The rest of the article goes on to talk about how they should definitely find justice candidates that are as extreme as the right wing in this country today, how they should be prepared to fight those battles and win, and more.

It does remind us, however, that Joe Biden was instrumental in walking through Justice Clarence Thomas' nomination. That's worth remembering when you hear the press tremble and drool over the prospect of Biden running for President.

Really, it's all smoke, because with this lineup of Republican yahoos, they're not going to see the inside of the White House or pick any Supreme Court nominees for a very long time to come.

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team