Read time: 2 minutes

Rachel Maddow Throws Cold Water On Idiotic Trump-Sanders Debate Idea (Updated)

Rachel had no time for this harebrained scheme.
Views:

To say that Ms. Maddow didn't think much of the idea would be a bit of an understatement. There was also more than a trace of disappointment that the idea originated with Bernie Sanders himself.

RACHEL MADDOW: On the day the Republican Party frontrunner clinches the nomination, an absolutely, 100% unprecedented plan now, to debate head-to-head, one-on-one, a candidate from the other party who, honestly, is not really in contention to win his party’s nomination. This is very strange. This is unprecedented.

Of course, strategically from Donald Trump’s perspective, this is like a hat trick and a grand slam and a slam dunk all in one. There’s no downside for Donald Trump to doing this, there’s no risk…Imagine the worst-case scenario for his debate with Bernie Sanders, where Bernie Sanders just trounces Donald Trump…That also poses no long-term strategic risk to Donald Trump, because there is no chance that Bernie Sanders is going to be Donald Trump’s general election opponent.

And, in fact, the better Bernie Sanders looks in a debate with Donald Trump, the better it is in the long run for Donald Trump, because that would only elevate Bernie Sanders’ standing in the ongoing Democratic primary…And if you elevate Bernie Sanders’ standing in that primary, which Bernie Sanders has no chance of winning, that still prolongs that already-long and expensive primary. It further undermines Hillary Clinton’s standing as the Democratic likely nominee…It only undercuts her. I mean, for Donald Trump, this prospect of a debate with Bernie Sanders all upside — all upside for him. Why on EARTH would Democrats let him play in their primary like this?

Maddow later compared the idea to President Obama debating Newt Gingrich in 2012, and admonished Sanders for ignoring his real opponent in the Democratic primary.

Update (Karoli): Trump says nevermind, no debate after all.

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team