October 27, 2016

Senator Ted Cruz told a gaggle of reporters at a campaign rally that there was a precedent to keep the Supreme Court at only eight members instead of the nine.

The Washington Post reported that Cruz said, "You know, I think there will be plenty of time for debate on that issue."

Cruz, when he was asked whether a Republican-controlled Senate should hold votes on a President Hillary Clinton’s nominees. “There is certainly long historical precedent for a Supreme Court with fewer justices. I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”

Obstructionism has become the Republican Party's main tool to govern. It's true that the size of the court has changed over the course of our history, but the Supreme Court has been made up of nine judges since the Judiciary Act of 1869.

Our Supreme Court has been set as it is for one hundred and forty seven years so it's a huge leap to think that Sen. Cruz' argument would be able to fly with the American public, if Hillary Clinton does win the presidency.

However, if the Democrats were to obstruct a Trump nominee in this way, there would be a mob made up of the Joe Walsh's of Trump supporters with muskets and torches in hand, to be loosed upon those they deem undesirable and obstructionist.

Can you help us out?

For nearly 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon