Read time: 2 minutes

Stacey Abrams On William Barr: 'Like Having Your Brother Summarize Your Report Card To Your Parents'

Stacey Abrams doubted the William Barr findings re the Mueller report, noting that Barr auditioned for the AG job by bashing the investigation.
Stacey Abrams On William Barr: 'Like Having Your Brother Summarize Your Report Card To Your Parents'
Image from: Via

Stacey Abrams smiled as she told a Los Angeles audience that having William Barr release a brief letter to Congress outlining Mueller's twenty-two-month investigation is “like having your brother summarize your report card to your parents.”

William Barr, who auditioned to be Trump's new Attorney general by sending a detailed memo to Rod Rosenstein describing why he feels a president can't really obstruct justice (pdf link) unless in extraordinary circumstances.

And since Mueller allegedly left the question of "did Trump did obstruct justice" open, Barr did what we knew he would do.

It is shocking how quickly he tried to vindicate Trump.

Abrams continued, "it is deeply inappropriate for someone who is an avowed partisan, who in part auditioned for the job by disparaging the report, to be responsible for summarizing the report."

Abrams remarked, “As someone who has had a recent experience of having the referee being in charge of the scorekeeping, and being the contestant, I am always suspect of a process that does not have transparency and independence.”

She has first hand knowledge as we all know.

Neal K. Katyal writes a great piece in the NY Times, "On the facts, Mr. Barr says that the government would need to prove that Mr. Trump acted with “corrupt intent” and there were no such actions. But how would Mr. Barr know? Did he even attempt to interview Mr. Trump about his intentions? What kind of prosecutor would make a decision about someone’s intent without even trying to talk to him? Particularly in light of Mr. Mueller’s pointed statement that his report does not “exonerate” Mr. Trump. Mr. Mueller didn’t have to say anything like that. He did so for a reason. And that reason may well be that there is troubling evidence in the substantial record that he compiled."

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team