Read time: 2 minutes

Trump-Appointed District Court Judge Tosses Wall Funding Lawsuit

Trevor McFadden has served his master well, ruling that the House of Representatives has no standing to sue the Executive branch.
Trump-Appointed District Court Judge Tosses Wall Funding Lawsuit
Judge Trevor McFadden speaks at his investiture ceremony Image from: Alex Wong/ Getty Images

U.S. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden ruled Monday that the House of Representatives can't sue the Executive Branch with regard to whether the so-called President can hijack appropriations power to build a wall.

The ruling appears to be fraught with contradiction. It begins this way:

Few ideas are more central to the American political tradition than the doctrine of separation of powers. Our Founders emerged from the Revolution determined to establish a government incapable of repeating the tyranny from which the Thirteen Colonies escaped. They did so by splitting power across three branches of the federal government and by providing each the tools required to preserve control over its functions. The “great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department,” James Madison explained, “consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others.”

And yet, McFadden ignores the fact that the Executive branch has run roughshod over the House of Representatives' power of the purse and instead rules that the House has no standing to sue the Executive Branch:

"This is a case about whether one chamber of Congress has the “constitutional means” to conscript the Judiciary in a political turf war with the President over the implementation of legislation. ... [W]hile the Constitution bestows upon Members of the House many powers, it does not grant them standing to hale the Executive Branch into court claiming a dilution of Congress’s legislative authority. The Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to hear the House’s claims and will deny its motion."

This is what happens when the Senate confirms right-wing hacks who wouldn't know the Constitution if it bit them in the ass. This case will now go to the D.C. Court of Appeals, presided over by Judge Merrick Garland.

Twitter had thoughts:

The entire ruling is below:

House v Mnuchin Opinion by Karoli on Scribd

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team