Read time: 1 minute

Feds Request Secrecy For Details Surrounding Hastert Trial

Hastert, who led the house for eight years before retiring in 2007, was indicted two weeks ago on charges he structured bank transactions to avoid triggering red flags.
Feds Request Secrecy For Details Surrounding Hastert Trial
Image from: www.usnews.com

Curious indeed. It's funny, how these urgent reasons for secrecy always seem to pop up in cases that affect the politically connected:

A federal judge agreed Monday to shroud in secrecy some of the evidence in the Dennis Hastert alleged hush-money case – which could include the identity of the mystery man described in the indictment as “Individual A.”

Prosecutors, with the agreement of the former House Speaker’s lawyers, asked for a protective order last week, citing “sensitive information” and the “privacy interests of third parties.”

U.S. District Judge Thomas Durkin – who is staying on the case even though he once donated money to Hastert’s campaign fund – granted the request, according to a court filing.

Hastert, who led the house for eight years before retiring in 2007, was indicted two weeks ago on charges he structured bank transactions to avoid triggering red flags and then lied about those cash withdrawals to the FBI.

Court papers say he was taking out the money because he agreed to pay “Individual A” $3.5 million in hush money to conceal “prior misconduct.”

Can you help us out?

For 16 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit. We work 7 days a week, 16 hours a day for our labor of love, but with rising hosting and associated costs, we need your help! Could you donate $20 for 2020? Please consider a one time or recurring donation of whatever amount you can spare, or consider subscribing for an ad-free experience. It will be greatly appreciated and help us continue our mission of exposing the real FAKE NEWS!

More C&L Coverage

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.