Hastert, who led the house for eight years before retiring in 2007, was indicted two weeks ago on charges he structured bank transactions to avoid triggering red flags.
Feds Request Secrecy For Details Surrounding Hastert Trial
Credit: www.usnews.com
June 16, 2015

Curious indeed. It's funny, how these urgent reasons for secrecy always seem to pop up in cases that affect the politically connected:

A federal judge agreed Monday to shroud in secrecy some of the evidence in the Dennis Hastert alleged hush-money case – which could include the identity of the mystery man described in the indictment as “Individual A.”

Prosecutors, with the agreement of the former House Speaker’s lawyers, asked for a protective order last week, citing “sensitive information” and the “privacy interests of third parties.”

U.S. District Judge Thomas Durkin – who is staying on the case even though he once donated money to Hastert’s campaign fund – granted the request, according to a court filing.

Hastert, who led the house for eight years before retiring in 2007, was indicted two weeks ago on charges he structured bank transactions to avoid triggering red flags and then lied about those cash withdrawals to the FBI.

Court papers say he was taking out the money because he agreed to pay “Individual A” $3.5 million in hush money to conceal “prior misconduct.”

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. When registering you will also be presented with the option to tie all your old Disqus comments to your new Insticator account. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.