Read time: 2 minutes

Which Flavor Of Right-Wing Propaganda Is Worse: Fox News Or Sinclair?

Fox News 24-7 brand of cable news propaganda is in-your-face, fury filled, and straightforward. Sinclair Broadcasting is more a more insidious variety, but is still propaganda. Which is worse?

Dave Weigel, who's following the Democratic presidential hopefuls in Iowa, spotted a nasty anti-Biden story on the local Sinclair channel, a piece Sinclair requires every one of its local stations to run:

Matt Yglesias responds:

I agree with Yglesias on that -- but I have my doubts about this:

I think the 24/7, in-your-face propaganda of Fox News (and right-wing talk radio) has done much more harm than insidious Sinclair propaganda has done, or is likely to do. I understand Yglesias's point: The Sinclair propaganda might reach swing voters who aren't fans of wall-to-wall conservative invective. It's dangerous.

But right-wing propaganda has succeeded in America by making conservatism seem like a way of life. It's not enough to vote Republican or agree with conservative stances on the issues -- Fox and talk radio make it seem as if every aspect of life is under threat from the left and the only possible response is constant fear, outrage, and vigilance. Long before YouTube or Facebook developed sophisticated algorithms to keep web surfers on their sites, Fox and talk radio discovered a potent mix of scare tactics and anger inducement that led to marathon viewing and listening.

All of which turned entire communities in America into places where a significant portion of the citizenry can't get much past "Hi, how are you?" without proclaiming their desire to deport Ilhan Omar and watch Hillary Clinton do a perp walk. The result is not just a pool of voters who'd crawl over ground glass to vote GOP every Election Day. It's neighbors who now believe that the obsessives' beliefs constitute a normal set of opinions.

The Sinclair propaganda might nudge a few fence-sitters into the Republican camp -- but I wonder whether it's very successful at that. One lesson we should draw from Donald Trump's 2016 campaign is that even swing voters respond to brash, condfident absolutism. Trump may have taken a few positions on issues that weren't in line with right-wing orthodoxy, but his list of enemies -- Democrats, liberals, scary non-white people, the non-conservative media -- was Fox's list. The anger was non-stop -- and Trump made it to the White House, succeeding where the less rabid Mitt Romney and John McCain had failed.

Fox is more of a danger than Sinclair. It sets out to rally the populace -- and that works.

Published with permission of No More Mr. Nice Blog

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage


New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team